Brian Basham
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Gmax
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 |
EFTA00016726.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 2021 regarding the 'US v. Maxwell' case (20cr330). Defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim provides a list of attendees, including legal counsel and Maxwell's family members (Ian, Kevin, Pandora, Philip, Isabel, Christine), for an October 21 teleconference and a November 1 in-person pretrial conference. The email responds to a request from Judge Alison J. Nathan's chambers regarding logistics, COVID-19 protocols, and speaking rules for the upcoming hearings.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030232.jpg
This document is an email dated March 10, 2011, from Ross Gow (ACUITY Reputation Limited) to himself, copying Ian and Kevin Maxwell among others. The email alerts the recipients that the Daily Mail has published 'phone logs' and includes links to an article titled 'Females-Jeffrey-Epstein-The-damning-telephone-log'. The body of the email contains pasted text from a news article discussing controversies surrounding Prince Andrew, specifically his sale of Sunninghill Park to Timur Kulibayev for £3 million over the asking price.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030230.jpg
An email chain from March 10, 2011, involving Ross Gow (Acuity Reputation), 'GMAX' (likely Ghislaine Maxwell), and Brian Basham discussing PR strategy regarding media coverage of Jeffrey Epstein ('JE'). The discussion focuses on correcting a headline, the definition of 'school' versus 'university' in the US, and the nuances of Florida's age of consent laws (Statute 794.05). Ross Gow's portion includes text from a media code of conduct regarding payments to criminals for stories.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030229.jpg
This document is an email chain from March 2011 involving Ghislaine Maxwell ('Gmax'), her brothers Ian and Kevin Maxwell, and associates like Ross Gow. The content focuses on media handling strategies, specifically analyzing the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) code regarding payments to witnesses in criminal trials. Ross Gow advises the group on how editors can justify payments in the 'public interest' while calling a figure named 'Maz' (likely a journalist) 'devious and cunning'.
Unknown
Suggesting a letter to the editor and citing Florida Statute 794.05 regarding age of consent and age gaps.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity