Manson

Person
Mentions
18
Relationships
2
Events
1
Documents
9
Also known as:
Michael Manson Marilyn Manson Eric Manson

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
2 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Brathwaite
Legal representative
6
2
View
person Johnny Depp
Proposed panelists
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
1977-01-01 Legal case Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98 (1977) U.S. Supreme Court View

EFTA00031435.pdf

This document is a discovery letter dated April 14, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to the defense counsel for Michael Thomas, one of the guards charged in connection with Jeffrey Epstein's death. The letter lists produced discovery materials including FBI reports and MCC documents, and provides statistical data from the Bureau of Prisons regarding disciplinary actions for log falsification and a list of inmate deaths at MCC and MDC over the last ten years, specifically listing Jeffrey Epstein's cause of death as 'Hanging' on August 10, 2019.

Legal correspondence / discovery letter
2025-12-25

DOJ-OGR-00005743.jpg

This document is a page from a legal filing, specifically page 6 of 8 from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 29, 2021. It outlines the legal standard for challenging the admissibility of identification testimony, citing several precedents like Raheem v. Kelly and Simmons v. United States. The text explains the two-part inquiry courts must use to determine if a pretrial identification procedure was unduly suggestive and, if so, whether the identification is still independently reliable based on factors established in Neil v. Biggers.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00005742.jpg

This document is a legal argument from a court filing, dated October 29, 2021, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The defense argues that a photographic identification of Ms. Maxwell conducted on June 23, 2021, was suggestive and tainted, and therefore should be suppressed by the Court. The argument cites several U.S. Supreme Court cases to support the claim that the procedure violated the defendant's right to due process.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00005740.jpg

This document is a 'Table of Authorities' from a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 29, 2021. It lists seven U.S. court cases, dating from 1967 to 2012, which are cited as legal precedent in the associated legal brief. The cases are from the U.S. Supreme Court and the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002826.jpg

This document is page 5 of a legal filing (filed March 24, 2021) outlining 'Applicable Law' under the Sixth Amendment regarding jury selection. It details the requirements for establishing a 'fair cross-section' of the community in a jury pool, citing precedents such as *Taylor v. Louisiana* and *Duren v. Missouri*. The footer indicates this document was processed by the Department of Justice (DOJ-OGR).

Legal memorandum / court filing (applicable law section)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00005849.jpg

This document is a legal document related to case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It discusses the admissibility of identification evidence and cites several legal precedents related to eyewitness identification and due process.

Legal document
2025-11-20

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023123.jpg

This document is a proposal for 'The New Origins Project Presents: Strange Bedfellows,' a discussion series moderated by Lawrence Krauss designed to pair cultural celebrities with famous scientists. The document lists 12 proposed panels featuring high-profile figures such as Johnny Depp, Elon Musk, Barack Obama, and Woody Allen, noting that '23 participants have already agreed in principle.' The document appears to be from a House Oversight Committee production, indicated by the footer stamp.

Project proposal / prospectus
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023121.jpg

This document is a proposal for 'The New Origins Project Presents: Strange Bedfellows,' a series moderated by Lawrence Krauss that aims to pair cultural celebrities with famous scientists for public dialogues. The document lists 12 proposed pairings for the first season, including high-profile figures like Barack Obama, Woody Allen, Elon Musk, and Johnny Depp, noting that '23 participants have already agreed in principle.' The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional review, likely related to investigations into Jeffrey Epstein's funding or associations with scientific organizations.

Project proposal / pitch document
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023120.jpg

This document is a pitch or proposal for a television series titled 'Strange Bedfellows,' moderated by physicist Lawrence Krauss. The proposal outlines a first season consisting of 10 episodes featuring high-profile pairings of cultural icons (e.g., Johnny Depp, Barack Obama, Woody Allen) with prominent scientists and intellectuals (e.g., Noam Chomsky, Steven Pinker, Elon Musk). The document appears to be part of the House Oversight files (indicated by the footer), likely related to investigations into Krauss's funding or associations, which historically included Jeffrey Epstein, though Epstein is not explicitly named in this specific text.

Project proposal / pitch document
2025-11-19
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity