| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
JANE
|
Visitor victim |
5
|
1 |
An email chain from September 30, 2019, between the FBI and an Assistant U.S. Attorney regarding evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's New York house. The AUSA expresses concern that the 'taint team' received 'way fewer documents than we would have expected' and requests an accounting of approximately 38 computers/storage devices and 55 CDs sent to the FBI's CART (Computer Analysis Response Team). An FBI Senior Forensic Examiner responds by requesting a phone call to discuss the matter.
This document is an email chain from September 30, 2019, between an SDNY Assistant U.S. Attorney and FBI agents regarding the processing of electronic evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's New York home and 'the Island'. The AUSA inquires about the low volume of documents received by the taint team despite the seizure of ~38 computers and ~55 CDs. The FBI Senior Forensic Examiner responds that processing is slow because a single machine contained over 800,000 emails and priority was shifted to processing evidence from the Island due to expiration dates.
An email dated September 30, 2019, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney (SDNY) to an FBI agent regarding materials seized from Epstein's New York house. The attorney notes that the 'taint team' received fewer documents than expected and asks for clarification on the processing status of approximately 38 computers/storage devices and 55 CDs sent to CART.
This document contains excerpts from depositions of Ghislaine Maxwell taken on April 22, 2016, and July 22, 2016. Maxwell denies knowingly inviting underage girls (other than friends' children) to Epstein's homes, denies knowledge of sex toys at Epstein's properties, and denies recruiting girls for sexual massages. She specifically denies giving a massage to a redacted individual (likely Virginia Giuffre) and claims her sexual involvement with Epstein was limited to him and two other specific women.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a legal argument between the defense (Mr. Everdell) and the prosecution (Ms. Moe) regarding the admissibility of photographs of a 'New York house' (implied to be Epstein's). The prosecution argues the photos corroborate the testimony of a witness named 'Jane,' who described specific decor (nude artwork, animal decorations, and a red massage room) present during her visits between 1994 and her early twenties.
This page is a transcript of a defense summation (Ms. Menninger) in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The attorney attempts to impeach a witness ('Jane') by highlighting discrepancies in her memory regarding the New York house, specifically her failure to recall a major 1994 reconstruction described by witnesses Juan Alessi and Larry Visoski. The text also mentions specific decor described by the accuser ('paintings of orgies') and notes that Cim Espinosa, an employee, specifically booked apartments for Jane and her mother.
This document is a court transcript page from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), featuring the direct examination of a witness identified as 'Jane'. Jane testifies about sexual abuse she endured at ages 14, 15, and 16 in the massage room of a New York house (implied to be Jeffrey Epstein's), confirming that Maxwell was present during those years. The testimony includes a detailed description of the massage room, noting it was off the master bathroom, very dark with red lighting, and contained a giant black massage table.
This document is a page from a legal summation by Ms. Menninger, likely in a trial related to Epstein. The speaker challenges a witness's testimony about Epstein's New York house by pointing out she failed to recall a major 1994 renovation mentioned by Larry Visoski. The speaker also argues that no government staff corroborated the witness's story or confirmed anything unusual, and introduces testimony from Cim Espinosa, who worked for Epstein and booked guests like "Jane" and her mother into his apartments.
This document outlines a list of 14 specific allegations regarding sexual misconduct, trafficking, and abuse facilitated by Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. It details encounters involving a minor (referred to as Virginia in one instance and redacted elsewhere), high-profile figures such as Prince Andrew and Bill Clinton, and describes the logistics of payments, locations, and surveillance used in these operations.
This document contains a numbered list of 14 allegations derived from the 'Jane Doe 102' complaint, detailing sexual abuse facilitated by Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. It alleges that the victim was trafficked to high-profile figures including Prince Andrew, Glenn Dubin, Les Wexner, Ehud Barak, and George Mitchell, and mentions Bill Clinton's presence on Little St James. The document also claims secret surveillance existed in Epstein's properties and lists financial benefits Epstein provided to Maxwell.
This document appears to be a forwarded email or list of allegations produced during a House Oversight inquiry (indicated by the footer). It details 14 specific claims regarding Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein's trafficking of a redacted victim (Jane Doe 102), starting when she was 15. The allegations include forced sexual encounters with high-profile figures such as Prince Andrew, Glenn Dubin, Les Wexner, Ehud Barak, George Mitchell, and Stephen Kosslyn, as well as details about payments, surveillance cameras in Epstein's homes, and a helicopter trip involving Bill Clinton.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity