Epstein's mother

Person
Mentions
22
Relationships
2
Events
2
Documents
11

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
2 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Jeffrey Epstein
Family
5
1
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Caregiver surrogate daughter
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2004-01-01 N/A Death of Jeffrey Epstein's mother. South Florida View
2004-01-01 N/A Epstein's mother was in a car crash, her health took a serious decline, and Epstein asked Ghislai... N/A View

EFTA00035174.pdf

A Bureau of Prisons memorandum dated August 10, 2019, documenting an event from the previous evening (August 9) where Jeffrey Epstein was escorted from attorney visitation to the Special Housing Unit (G Tier) to make a social call. The Unit Manager notes that Epstein claimed to be calling his mother, and the manager dialed a number beginning with 347 for him because Epstein's phone account was not set up properly; the call lasted 15 minutes.

Memorandum for file / bureau of prisons record
2025-12-25

EFTA00032505.pdf

A Federal Bureau of Prisons memorandum dated August 10, 2019, detailing a social phone call made by inmate Jeffrey Epstein on the evening of August 9, 2019. The Unit Manager describes escorting Epstein to a shower in the Special Housing Unit (G Tier) to make the call, noting that the staff member had to dial the number (starting with area code 347) because Epstein's PAC/PIN system was not set up. Epstein claimed he was calling his mother, and the call was terminated after 15 minutes.

Federal bureau of prisons memorandum
2025-12-25

EFTA00020261.pdf

This document is an Opinion & Order by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court denied Maxwell's motions to dismiss the indictment based on Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement, statute of limitations, and pre-indictment delay. However, the Court granted Maxwell's motion to sever the perjury charges, ruling they will be tried separately from the sex trafficking-related counts to ensure a fair trial.

Court opinion & order
2025-12-25

EFTA00013811.pdf

This document is a legal submission by Kirkland & Ellis LLP to the Deputy Attorney General arguing against federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein in circa 2008. The defense argues that Epstein's conduct amounts to state-level solicitation of prostitution rather than federal sex trafficking or sex tourism, citing recent Supreme Court decisions to advocate for a narrow interpretation of federal statutes. The text asserts that Epstein did not target minors, did not use interstate commerce to lure victims, and that any underage women lied about their age.

Legal submission / memorandum
2025-12-25

DOJ-OGR-00022431.tif

This document is a transcript where Ghislaine Maxwell describes her relationship with Jeffrey Epstein's mother, whom she considered 'like a surrogate mother'. She explains that after Epstein's mother had a car crash and her health declined around 2004-2005, Jeffrey Epstein asked Ghislaine Maxwell to care for her, which involved organizing doctors and ensuring her well-being. Epstein's mother lived in a retirement establishment in Palm Beach.

Transcript/testimony
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00021027.jpg

This document is page 44 of a court order (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on April 29, 2022, denying the Defendant's (Ghislaine Maxwell) Rule 29 motion to vacate convictions. The court rejects arguments regarding prejudice due to absent deceased witnesses (including Jeffrey Epstein, his mother, Michael Casey, and Detective Joseph Recarey) and claims of pre-indictment delay. The text references evidence establishing the Defendant's close work with an individual named Markham on a manual and checklists.

Legal court filing / order denying motion
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00010410.jpg

This document is page 44 of a court order denying Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 29 motion and motion to vacate convictions. The court rejects arguments regarding prejudice due to deceased witnesses (including Jeffrey Epstein, his mother, Michael Casey, and Joseph Recarey) and pre-indictment delay. The text references evidence GX-424, an email chain showing Maxwell worked closely with an individual named Markham to create a household manual.

Court opinion/order
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00009600.jpg

This legal document is a court filing in which the defendant argues for the case to be dismissed due to substantial prejudice caused by pre-indictment delay. The defendant claims the deaths of several witnesses, including architects, a property manager, and a housekeeper who worked for Epstein, as well as others like Jeffrey Epstein himself, prevent a fair trial. The document indicates the Court has previously rejected these arguments as speculative and lacking evidence of actual prejudice.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00003006.jpg

A page from a court filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The text argues against Maxwell's motion claiming prejudice due to pre-indictment delay, specifically rejecting her assertion that the deaths of potential witnesses (Jeffrey Epstein, his mother, Michael Casey, and Detective Recarey) harmed her defense. The court/prosecution argues it is highly speculative to assume Epstein would have waived his Fifth Amendment rights to testify in Maxwell's favor and be found credible by a jury.

Court filing / legal opinion (united states v. ghislaine maxwell)
2025-11-20

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025542.jpg

This document is a first-person statement, likely by Jeffrey Epstein, criticizing the handling of his plea deal and subsequent civil suits. He alleges that the government violated the spirit of his agreement, that an opposing attorney engaged in nepotism and excessive billing ($800,000), and that the accusers were unreliable witnesses who worked in the sex trade. He defends himself by claiming he was merely a 'consumer of prostitution' rather than a trafficker and explains he took the plea deal to avoid a mandatory 10-year sentence and a biased trial.

Personal statement / legal memorandum (first-person narrative by jeffrey epstein)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012143.jpg

This document is a page from a legal submission by Kirkland & Ellis LLP to the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, arguing against federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. The text asserts that federal statutes are being impermissibly stretched and requests that the case be handled by the State of Florida. In the 'Summary of Facts,' the defense claims Epstein did not personally schedule massages, that sexual activity was limited primarily to self-masturbation, and that underage women systematically lied to Epstein about their age.

Legal memorandum / defense submission
2025-11-19
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity