This document is a page from a court transcript in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The text records a judge providing legal guidance regarding the admissibility of prior inconsistent statements and extrinsic evidence under Rule 613(b). The judge cites specific case law (Almonte, Leonardi) to explain that law enforcement notes generally do not prove inconsistency unless the witness subscribed to them or the interviewing officer is called as a witness.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It records a judge's ruling sustaining the government's objection to the introduction of prior inconsistent statements as extrinsic evidence without first giving the witness an opportunity to explain them. The ruling cites Federal Rule 613(a) and case precedents including United States v. Surdow and Miller's Federal Practice and Procedure.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity