This document is a legal filing by Petitioners Jane Doe 1 and 2 in May 2019, arguing for specific procedures to determine a remedy after the court ruled the Government violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) by secretly negotiating a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein. The petitioners argue the Government should immediately announce its proposed remedy, specifically the rescission of the NPA's immunity clauses, and request limited discovery including depositions of key figures like former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta and Epstein's attorney Jay Lefkowitz regarding a secret 2007 'breakfast meeting.' The filing includes correspondence between victims' counsel and the U.S. Attorney's Office, highlighting the Government's delay tactics and the recent recusal of the Southern District of Florida office.
This document is an email chain from January 2021 between attorney Jack Scarola and an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) regarding a victim's willingness to testify in an upcoming trial (scheduled for July 12, 2021, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial). The correspondence focuses on the logistics of the witness's testimony, specifically her requirement that her husband and three minor children accompany her to New York. The AUSA confirms that the government (SDNY/FBI Victim Services) will fund the travel and hotel accommodations for the entire family to secure her testimony.
This document is a chain of emails from March 9-10, 2020, between attorney Jack Scarola and an Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) from the Southern District of New York. The AUSA is seeking to interview a woman (name redacted) regarding an investigation. Scarola indicates that his own attempts to contact the woman have been ignored and provides her phone number to the AUSA, stating he has no objection to them contacting her directly.
This document is an email thread from January 2021 involving the law firm Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The correspondence concerns the transmission of 'Discovery Responses' filed on behalf of a redacted female client in a civil matter against Jeffrey Epstein. The sender, Chris R. Rodgers, confirms the attachment of these legal documents.
This document is an email dated January 19, 2021, from Chris R. Rodgers to Jack Scarola and others, attaching discovery responses for a civil matter against Jeffrey Epstein. The email originates from the law firm Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. The plaintiff's name is redacted, but the email references filings made on her behalf.
This document is an email chain from July 2020 between attorney Jack Scarola and likely FBI/prosecutors arranging a WebEx interview for a witness/victim in the Epstein case. Scarola provides a summary 'proffer' or list of the witness's interactions, stating she saw Epstein over 100 times, met Ghislaine Maxwell ~10 times (including seeing nude photos of her), and was transported by Epstein's drivers ~50 times. The emails confirm the logistical details for the interview to take place on July 17, 2020, at Scarola's office.
This document is an email thread from September 2020 between attorney Jack Scarola and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The discussion concerns locating a 2009 deposition transcript from a civil case against Jeffrey Epstein ('[Redacted] vs Epstein'). Since the court reporting service and videographer could not locate the original records, Scarola provided detailed notes taken by paralegal Mike Danchuk, describing the testimony as revealing Epstein's pattern of grooming and victimization. USANYS also mentions coordinating with Epstein Estate attorneys Marc Weinstein and Andrew Tomback to obtain the transcript.
This document is a Plaintiff's Notice of Serving Second Amended Answers to Interrogatories in a 2009 civil case against Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida. The plaintiff, whose name is redacted, details her residence history and her interactions with Epstein between 2002 and 2003, stating she visited his Florida home roughly twice a week to provide massages after being introduced by a friend. The document reveals she recruited other females for Epstein in exchange for payment, used drugs (Morning Glory, Angel Trumpets, cocaine, marijuana) during the relevant period, and lists various legal counsel and law enforcement entities involved in the investigation.
An email chain from August to October 2019 between attorney Jack Scarola and an Assistant US Attorney from the SDNY. Scarola introduces a victim who was molested by Jeffrey Epstein in Florida starting at age 14 and received lingerie gifts from him. The prosecutors express strong interest in interviewing the victim and offer to travel to Florida to do so, following up multiple times to arrange the meeting.
This document is a Notice of Filing containing a transcript of a telephone interview conducted by attorneys Bradley Edwards and Jack Scarola with a former employee/victim of Jeffrey Epstein. The witness details Epstein flying in 12-year-old girls from France for his birthday, his claims that powerful people 'owed him,' and an attempt by Epstein and his lawyers to silence her in 2007 with offers to be 'looked after.' The witness also describes a 'sick proposition' where Epstein offered to pay her to bear a child that he and Ghislaine Maxwell would raise, before she eventually escaped his control by marrying a man she met in Thailand in 2002.
This document is an email chain from September 2020 involving attorney Jack Scarola and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The correspondence concerns the search for a specific deposition transcript and video from December 4, 2009, in a civil case against Jeffrey Epstein ([Redacted] vs Epstein). The court reporter and videography service confirmed they could not locate the records. Consequently, Scarola provided notes taken contemporaneously by his paralegal/investigator Mike Danchuk, noting that the witness described Epstein's pattern of recruitment and grooming.
This document is an email chain from September 2020 between attorney Jack Scarola and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). They discuss the inability to locate the official transcript and video of a deposition from December 4, 2009, related to a case against Jeffrey Epstein. In the absence of the official record, Scarola provides contemporaneous notes taken by a paralegal, noting that they describe 'troubled young women' susceptible to Epstein's 'recruitment, grooming and victimization.'
This document is an email chain from July 2020 between attorney Jack Scarola and likely FBI/DOJ officials arranging a WebEx interview for a client/witness regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The emails contain a detailed proffer or summary of the witness's interactions, stating she saw Epstein over 100 times, was picked up by his drivers 50 times, and met Ghislaine Maxwell approximately 10 times at the Palm Beach residence. The witness also recalls seeing nude photos of Maxwell and mentions interactions with housekeeping staff and cooks.
Email exchange between attorney Jack Scarola and an Assistant US Attorney regarding a motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense. The defense is seeking to subpoena information from the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund regarding a specific (redacted) individual. The AUSA states their intention to file a motion to quash this subpoena to protect the victim's information.
This document is a page from a court filing, Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM, dated September 17, 2009, listing multiple attorneys and their respective law firms, contact information, and the specific related cases they represent plaintiffs in. It details legal counsel for various plaintiffs, including 'Jane Doe' and 'C.M.A.', across several related case numbers, providing contact details for each attorney and their firm.
This is a court filing from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, dated October 28, 2009. Attorneys Jack Scarola and Jack P. Hill, representing an unnamed (redacted) Plaintiff, filed a notice confirming they served 'Second Amended Answers to Interrogatories' to the defendants, Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. The document notes that the original interrogatories were propounded by Epstein on January 16, 2009. It is marked as Defendant's Exhibit C-9 in a later criminal case (20 Cr. 330).
This legal document is a 'Notice of Serving Answers to Interrogatories' filed in the Southern District of Florida on February 18, 2009. It certifies that the Plaintiff (whose name is redacted) has provided answers to questions (interrogatories) previously asked by Defendant Jeffrey Epstein on January 16, 2009. The document lists Sarah Kellen as a co-defendant and was prepared by attorney Jack Scarola of the firm Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. The document was later used as Defendant's Exhibit C-8 in the criminal trial S2 20 Cr. 330 (US v. Ghislaine Maxwell).
This document is a 'Notice of Filing' submitted to the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County on May 17, 2011, in the case of Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, Bradley Edwards, and L.M. Attorney Jack Scarola, representing Bradley Edwards, filed a transcript of a telephone interview with Virginia Roberts to support a motion for punitive damages against Epstein. The document includes a certificate of service indicating it was mailed to opposing counsel.
This document is page 17 of a court filing in the case of Edwards vs. Dershowitz, specifically a response to Dershowitz's motion to seal records. It quotes Alan Dershowitz attacking attorneys Edwards and Cassell and their client Virginia Giuffre during a CNN interview, accusing them of being unethical and motivated by money. The filing concludes by requesting the court deny Dershowitz's motion to seal documents regarding Giuffre's allegations.
A legal Certificate of Service dated April 9, 2015, signed by Sigrid S. McCawley. The document certifies the electronic service of legal filings to attorneys representing Alan Dershowitz (Wiley Rein, LLP) and attorneys for the Plaintiffs (Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.), as well as attorneys at Cole, Scott & Kissane. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
This document appears to be the final page (page 3) of an email communication. It contains the contact information for James E. Hill, a producer at ABC News in Chicago, followed by duplicate standard legal disclaimers from the law firm Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., indicating the email chain involved legal counsel. The page includes Bates stamps 'BE-000031' and 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015586'.
This is a 'Notice of Filing' from May 17, 2011, in a civil case where Jeffrey Epstein is suing Scott Rothstein, Bradley Edwards, and L.M. Attorney Jack Scarola, representing Bradley Edwards, is filing a transcript of a telephone interview with Virginia Roberts. This evidence is intended to support a motion to amend the counter-claim to assert punitive damages.
This document is a 'Certificate of Service' page from a legal filing dated January 17, 2014. It certifies that attorney William B. King served a copy of 'Edwards' Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment' via E-Serve. The document lists the contact information for the law firm Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., representing Bradley J. Edwards.
This document is a Certificate of Service page from a legal filing in the case of Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz (Case No. CACE 15-000072). It certifies that attorney Jack Scarola sent a copy of the Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Production of Documents via E-Serve on March 2, 2015. The document includes Scarola's contact information at Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., and bears a House Oversight stamp.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity