This document is a legal filing, specifically page 3 of a 'Motion to Intervene' in case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB, filed on August 27, 2019. The filer, identified as the Intervenor/Relator, outlines a timeline of legal actions against the USDOJ and Bill Barr, alleging a conspiracy, fraud, and the monopolization of the judiciary. The filer connects their case to the Jeffrey Epstein case, citing the concept of "prosecutorial discretion" and argues for their right to intervene based on legal precedent where a third party's constitutional rights are implicated.
This document is page 8 of a court filing (Document 609) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), dated February 24, 2022. It presents legal arguments citing various precedents to establish that jurors retain privacy interests after a trial concludes and that jurors face criminal exposure for perjury on questionnaires. It also argues that third parties may intervene in criminal trials to protect their constitutional rights.
This document is page 3 of 13 from a legal filing (Document 609) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on February 24, 2022. It is a Table of Authorities listing various legal precedents (case law). The cases cited largely pertain to press access, public trials, and the sealing of judicial documents (e.g., Associated Press, Press-Enterprise Co.), suggesting the filing relates to transparency issues or the unsealing of evidence in the Maxwell trial.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity