Bradshaw
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000-07-20 | Legal case | Citation for United States v. Bradshaw, 2000 WL 1371517. | D. Kan. | View |
DOJ-OGR-00001110.jpg
This legal document argues for the reconsideration of Ms. Maxwell's bail application. It cites several legal precedents that allow a court to reopen bail hearings based on new evidence or changed circumstances. The primary new evidence cited is the voluminous discovery (over 2.7 million pages) produced by the government after the initial hearing, which the defense claims raises serious questions about the strength of the government's case.
DOJ-OGR-00001100.jpg
This document is a "Table of Authorities" from a legal filing, specifically page iii of a larger document. It lists thirteen federal court cases, providing their full citations, the dates of the decisions, and the page numbers within the filing where each case is referenced. All listed cases feature the United States as a party.
DOJ-OGR-00001986.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues for the reconsideration of a bail decision for a defendant, Ms. Maxwell. It cites several legal precedents (United States v. Lee, Bradshaw, Rowe, and Petrov) to establish that the Court has the inherent authority to reopen a bail hearing, especially when new evidence is presented. The filing asserts that Ms. Maxwell has obtained substantial new information, including over 2.7 million pages of discovery from the government, which was unavailable at her initial hearing and raises questions about the strength of the government's case.
DOJ-OGR-00001976.jpg
This document is page 4 of a court filing (Document 97) from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on December 14, 2020. It is a 'Table of Authorities' listing various legal precedents (United States v. Boustani, Bradshaw, Chen, etc.) cited elsewhere in the filing. The page is numbered 'iii' and bears the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00001976.
DOJ-OGR-00020028.jpg
This legal document argues that the court should reconsider Ms. Maxwell's bail application based on new evidence. It cites legal precedents affirming the court's authority to reconsider such decisions and states that Ms. Maxwell has received over 2.7 million pages of discovery from the government since her initial hearing, which allegedly raises serious questions about the strength of the government's case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022011.jpg
This document is an excerpt from the book 'Filthy Rich' (submitted as House Oversight evidence) detailing Jeffrey Epstein's controversial work release conditions while jailed at 'the Stockade.' It highlights that Sheriff Bradshaw minimized Epstein's crimes, allowing him to leave jail six days a week to visit his lawyer or foundation. Crucially, it notes that while Epstein was incarcerated, his associate Jean-Luc Brunel took up residence at Epstein's home on El Brillo Way, where Nadia Marcinkova was also present.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010543.jpg
This document consists of pages 202-203 from the book 'Filthy Rich' by James Patterson, submitted as evidence in a House Oversight investigation. The text details the lenient work release conditions of Jeffrey Epstein's incarceration at the 'Stockade,' noting he was allowed to leave six days a week to visit his lawyer, foundation, or home in West Palm Beach. Crucially, it identifies Jean-Luc Brunel as residing at Epstein's El Brillo Way home for the duration of Epstein's jail sentence, describing Brunel as a 'suave' man with a French accent.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity