The Board
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-08-30 | N/A | Publication of final rule and discussion of public comments in the Federal Register regarding an ... | United States | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022316.jpg
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, detailing public comments and the issuing agency's response to a new labor rule requiring employers to post notices of employee rights regarding unionization. The document discusses the economic impact of the rule, its classification under the Congressional Review Act, and its exemption from the Paperwork Reduction Act. This document is related to U.S. labor law and contains no information whatsoever about Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or any related matters.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022315.jpg
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, discussing a proposed rule from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and the Board's response to public comments. Various business associations and law firms raised concerns about the compliance costs and economic impact on small businesses, particularly regarding legal fees and requirements for electronic notice posting. Despite the user's prompt, this document has no discernible connection to Jeffrey Epstein; it is a regulatory document concerning U.S. labor law.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022314.jpg
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, detailing the National Labor Relations Board's (NLRB) justification for a new rule requiring employers to post notices of employee rights. The NLRB concludes the rule will not have a significant economic impact on small businesses, estimating the cost at $64.40, and refutes critical comments from organizations like Baker & Daniels LLP. Despite the user's prompt suggesting a link to Epstein, the document's content is exclusively about U.S. labor law and contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein or his associates.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022313.jpg
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, containing a dissenting opinion regarding a new rule from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). The author argues the rule, which compels employers to post notices of employee rights, is a flawed and unauthorized attempt to increase union density. The document also details the Regulatory Flexibility Act analysis, which estimates a minimal compliance cost for businesses, a figure contested by industry commenters. The content of this specific document does not pertain to Jeffrey Epstein or related matters.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022302.jpg
This document from the Federal Register discusses the enforcement of a rule requiring employers to post a notice of employee rights under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). It addresses jurisdictional complexities for religiously-affiliated employers and exempts the U.S. Postal Service from the rule, while outlining enforcement mechanisms like treating non-compliance as an unfair labor practice rather than relying on voluntary compliance or monetary fines.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022299.jpg
This document from the Federal Register details the Board's response to public comments on a proposed rule requiring employers to post a notice of employee rights. The Board addresses concerns about enforcement, application to remote and dispersed workforces, the 11x17-inch poster size, and language requirements for non-English speaking employees. Ultimately, the Board retains most of the proposed rule, including the poster size and language requirements, but removes the mandate for color printing to reduce employer costs.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022295.jpg
This document is a page from the Federal Register detailing the Board's (likely the NLRB) response to public comments on proposed rules regarding unlawful employer conduct related to union organizing. The Board discusses and justifies its decisions on the final language for provisions concerning no-solicitation rules, questioning employees, threats to close workplaces, and promising benefits to discourage unionization. The Board revised the language on solicitation to include "talking" about a union and clarified its stance on other potentially unlawful employer actions.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022278.jpg
This document is a page from the Federal Register, dated August 30, 2011, outlining the National Labor Relations Board's (NLRB) final rule requiring employers to post notices informing employees of their rights under the NLRA. It discusses the rule's legal basis, the public comment process that received over 7,000 submissions, and key changes made to the final rule. Though the prompt references Epstein, the content of this specific document is strictly about U.S. labor law and does not mention Jeffrey Epstein or any related individuals or events.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity