Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Weinstein

Person
Mentions
11
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
5
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.

DOJ-OGR-00022753.tif

This document is page 43 of an index or cross-reference list, likely from a legal document, containing various words and names with corresponding page and line numbers. It includes references to individuals like Villafana, Waitt, Weinstein, Werner, and Wexner, and features a redaction labeled 'DOJ REDACTION'.

Index/cross-reference list
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00022650.tif

This document is an index or keyword list, likely from a larger report, containing various words and names with corresponding page and line references. It includes a DOJ redaction and mentions several individuals such as Villafana, Waitt, Weinstein, Werner, and Wexner, along with terms like 'viewed', 'visited', 'wanted', 'wedding', and 'weekend'.

Index/keyword list
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00008426.jpg

This legal document, dated December 15, 2021, is an argument from Ms. Maxwell's counsel to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the trial testimony of a witness named 'Jane'. Counsel argues that because Jane denied the substance of a prior statement in court, they should be allowed to introduce extrinsic evidence to prove that statement under Federal Rule of Evidence 613, citing legal precedent. The document concludes by noting that due to time constraints, counsel was unable to meet a 10:15 p.m. deadline to list all such disputed statements.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005792.jpg

This legal document, a page from a court filing, discusses the standards for admitting expert testimony in court. It argues that a district court has broad discretion in determining the reliability of such testimony and that it must also be relevant, concerning matters beyond the understanding of an average juror. The document cites several precedents, focusing on cases where courts admitted expert testimony on the psychological dynamics between perpetrators and victims of sex crimes, such as the 'pimp-prostitute relationship' and 'trauma bonding'.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021108.jpg

This document appears to be a page from a printed email news digest or media monitoring report, bearing the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021108'. It lists various news headlines categorized by topic (Opinion, Tech, Pro Bankruptcy, Politics), covering subjects such as the Weinstein Co. bankruptcy, Michael Flynn's guilty plea, the Clinton campaign, and Tesla's leadership changes. Based on the specific combination of headlines (specifically the Tesla engineering chief's leave of absence), the document likely dates to approximately May 2018.

News digest / email newsletter printout
2025-11-19
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search