U.S. Attorney's office
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Employment |
6
|
2 |
EFTA00019289.pdf
An email thread from December 18, 2020, between staff at the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding a correction to the discovery production for Ghislaine Maxwell. A paralegal identified incorrect Bates numbers on seven items from previous productions, re-stamped them, and prepared a disc to be sent to Maxwell at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) and emailed to defense counsel.
EFTA00019282.pdf
An email chain from December 17, 2020, involving the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). A Paralegal Specialist confirms that the 'Eighth Production materials' related to the Maxwell case (indicated by attachment names) have been left for FedEx pickup with tracking number 816289189888. Subsequent emails involve coordinating the transmission of cover letters to MDC counsel.
EFTA00018969.pdf
This document is an internal email from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) Public Affairs division, dated August 10, 2019. The subject is 'Redlined statement' and it includes an attachment titled 'Jeffrey_Epstein_Statement.docx', indicating the drafting of an official statement on the day of Epstein's death.
EFTA00017786.pdf
An internal email from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York dated August 14, 2019. The email discusses an upcoming Wall Street Journal report stating that federal prosecutors are investigating whether the two staffers guarding Jeffrey Epstein the night he died falsified records regarding their checks on him.
EFTA00016997.pdf
This document contains a chain of emails from January 2020 between defense counsel and federal prosecutors (likely SDNY and FBI) negotiating a high-stakes 'proffer' meeting. The prosecutors express urgency, stating that 'offenses can be charged now,' and arrange a meeting for January 24, 2020, attended by the U.S. Attorney and FBI leadership, to hear the defense's presentation before charges are filed. The correspondence explicitly discusses a client (Ms. [Redacted]) and her recollection of observing Jeffrey Epstein engaged in sexual activity or observing other women in sexually suggestive circumstances.
EFTA00016732.pdf
This document is an internal email chain from the SDNY U.S. Attorney's Office dated January 2020. It summarizes newly received flight records indicating that Donald Trump flew on Jeffrey Epstein's private jet at least eight times between 1993 and 1996, significantly more than previously reported. The email details that Ghislaine Maxwell was present on at least four of these flights, and notes specific trips involving Trump's family members and a 20-year-old female passenger.
EFTA00016482.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 24, 2021, among staff at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The emails discuss the urgent review and preparation of discovery materials (referred to as 'productions', including '3500' material and 'Rule 16' material) related to the 'USvEpstein' case (specifically the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, denoted as 'GM'). The team was coordinating to load these files onto a hard drive to be sent via FedEx to the defense team before a 4 PM pickup deadline. The document includes internal DOJ network file paths pointing to trial materials.
EFTA00016465.pdf
This document is an email chain dated December 9, 2020, from a Paralegal Specialist/Contractor at the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY). The sender is transmitting exhibits related to Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed bail application. The top email explains that a previous attempt to send the files failed due to size limits, so the exhibits are being split into two parts.
EFTA00016316.pdf
An email exchange between an FBI Forensic Accountant and a Paralegal Specialist at the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) dated June 10, 2020. They discuss the management of a 'tracker of bank subpoenas' related to the Epstein case, specifically addressing the transfer of subpoena returns. The paralegal requests that files be uploaded to a system called 'USAfx' rather than sent on physical discs, citing 'the circumstances' (likely COVID-19 related given the date).
EFTA00015937.pdf
This document is a confidential cover letter dated November 19, 2019, from Akin Gump (representing Deutsche Bank) to the SDNY U.S. Attorney's Office, detailing the production of bank records related to Jeffrey Epstein. The production includes records of asset transfers from JP Morgan, cash withdrawals by Epstein's attorney and accountant, and transactions involving entities like Gratitude America, Ltd., LSJE, LLC, and the Butterfly Trust. It also mentions internal bank policies (ARRC) and due diligence regarding the '2017 Caterpillar Trust'.
EFTA00015646.pdf
This document is an internal 'News Brief' email dated August 27, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) Terrorism & International Narcotics Unit. It summarizes various current events, starting with the closure of the MCC jail where Jeffrey Epstein died, followed by reports on TikTok hate speech, the T-Mobile hack, lawsuits against Donald Trump regarding the Capitol Riot, and extensive coverage of the US withdrawal from Afghanistan and the ISIS-K bombing at Kabul airport. It concludes with a 'Significant Dates in History' section recounting the 1979 IRA assassination of Lord Mountbatten.
EFTA00014172.pdf
An email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney to Barry Krischer discussing the confidentiality clauses of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement. The sender informs Krischer that Epstein's defense team (Lefkowitz, Black, Goldberger) must be notified before any disclosure, specifically regarding a request or potential lawsuit from the 'Shiny Sheet' (Palm Beach Daily News). The email also notes that the defense has failed to file the complete agreement with the Court as previously ordered.
EFTA00014098.pdf
This document is an email thread from July 2008 between attorney Ted Leopold and an unnamed Assistant U.S. Attorney (USAFLS) regarding the 'Epstein Investigation.' The AUSA provides contact details and thanks Leopold for assistance. Leopold replies, copying attorney Spencer Kuvin, stating he will provide 'the names' the following day and asks Kuvin to meet with him.
EFTA00014044.pdf
This document is an email chain between Assistant U.S. Attorneys dated November 20, 2008, reacting with surprise and anger to the news that Jeffrey Epstein was granted work release. The prosecutors discuss how Epstein's lawyers (Goldberger and Roy) had previously assured them this would not happen. The emails allege that the 'Florida Science Foundation' exists solely to employ Epstein, allowing him to spend his days at his lawyer's office rather than in confinement.
EFTA00014025.pdf
This document is an internal email chain within the USAFLS (U.S. Attorney's Office, Southern District of Florida) dated August 15, 2008. An employee inquires about the status of 'Operation Leap Year' for caseload certification purposes. An Assistant U.S. Attorney responds that the operation remains technically open 'in case he breaches' (referring to the subject's plea/non-prosecution agreement) but should be considered 'on hold.'
EFTA00013860.pdf
This document is an internal email thread from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida dated September 17, 2009. The emails discuss media strategy in anticipation of a Palm Beach Post article about the Epstein deal. An Assistant U.S. Attorney clarifies that U.S. Attorney 'Alex' (likely Alexander Acosta) intended the prosecution to remain a state case to allow State Attorney Barry Krischer to 'save face,' while establishing minimum penalties as a 'floor' rather than a ceiling.
EFTA00013831.pdf
This document is an email dated August 14, 2008, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney to Roy Black and 'Jay' (defense attorneys). It summarizes the results of a hearing with Judge Marra, who ordered that the 'Agreement' (likely the Non-Prosecution Agreement) be disclosed to victims and their counsel under a protective order, but further disclosure disputes must be litigated directly with Mr. Epstein in civil suits.
EFTA00013801.pdf
This document is a legal rebuttal from Kirkland & Ellis LLP regarding the government's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation and the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The defense argues that the DOJ's review was not independent, alleges prosecutorial misconduct regarding victim notification and the selection of victim representatives (citing a conflict of interest involving an AUSA's boyfriend), and disputes the government's characterization of the sexual conduct. The document also details the defense's objections to the government's threat to terminate the agreement if Epstein did not comply with unilaterally modified terms by June 2, 2008.
EFTA00013764.pdf
An email exchange dated December 7, 2007, between an Assistant U.S. Attorney in West Palm Beach and a superior. The AUSA asks for permission to send out victim notification letters and to copy Mr. Josefsberg (likely Epstein's defense attorney) on them. The superior responds from a BlackBerry with a direct order to 'Hold the letter,' indicating a delay or intervention in the notification process.
EFTA00013570.pdf
This document is a legal response filed on August 1, 2008, by victims of Jeffrey Epstein (Jane Doe #1 and #2) against the United States Government. The victims allege violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically that the government entered into a secret Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Epstein in September 2007 without conferring with them and actively misled them into believing a federal investigation was ongoing. The filing requests the court to order the production of the NPA and an FBI interview report, and to schedule a hearing to determine remedies for the violation of the victims' rights.
EFTA00011428.pdf
This document is an email dated October 14, 2020, from a Paralegal Specialist at the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to attorney Montell Figgins. The email serves as a transmittal for 'Discovery Production 6' in the case 'U.S. v Thomas, No. 19 Cr 830', likely referring to the prosecution of the correctional officers involved in Jeffrey Epstein's detention. It notes the upload of materials to USAfx and the attachment of a specific 'attorney's eyes only' document.
EFTA00010043.pdf
This document is an email thread between members of the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding 'Outside juror research' for the US v. Maxwell trial. The emails, dated November 16-17, 2021, discuss coordinating research on the next 40 potential jurors (starting at #117) in preparation for voir dire proceedings the following day. The thread includes a file attachment related to juror notes and research.
DOJ-OGR-00021789.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal filing related to Case 22-1426, dated March 10, 2024. It identifies Andrew Rohrbach of the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) as the attorney presenting argument for the Appellee-Respondent. The bottom half of the page contains a 'Notice to the Bar' outlining standard procedures for obtaining audio recordings of arguments, arranging court reporters, and requesting interpreter services.
DOJ-OGR-00021783.jpg
This document is Page 2 of a court filing (Case 22-1426) dated February 22, 2024, submitted by attorney Andrew Rohrbach of the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY). Rohrbach is identifying himself as the attorney presenting argument for the Appellee-Respondent. The document includes a 'Notice to the Bar' detailing procedures and costs for obtaining audio recordings of arguments, arranging court reporters, and requesting interpreter services.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity