O.J. Simpson
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Chamales
|
Legal representative |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Alan Dershowitz
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Johnnie Cochran
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | OJ Simpson double murder prosecution | California (implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | O.J. Simpson case | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | O.J. Simpson Criminal Trial | Unknown (context implies USA) | View |
| N/A | N/A | The O.J. Simpson Case | Courts | View |
| 0000-01-11 | N/A | President Clinton's final budget for fiscal year 2001 is presented; 'Chamales' case involves an a... | United States | View |
DOJ-OGR-00009112.jpg
This document is page 5 of a legal filing (Document 614) submitted on February 24, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The text, likely from the NACDL, argues that high-profile trials create pressure on jurors to convict for fame or to avoid public scorn, citing the 'stealth juror' phenomenon. It specifically alleges that 'Juror 50' in the Maxwell trial used social media to express appreciation for gratitude received for convicting Maxwell, and compares the situation to historical cases like O.J. Simpson and Rodney King.
DOJ-OGR-00031401.jpg
This document is a Palm Beach Post newspaper article from November 16, 2007, discussing the controversial legal case against Jeffrey Epstein for soliciting underage girls. The article critiques the justice system and State Attorney Barry Krischer, suggesting Epstein's wealth might lead to a lenient plea deal, and names his high-profile legal team including Alan Dershowitz and Kenneth Starr. A handwritten note indicates the article was faxed to the State Attorney's Office and filed as part of the official case record.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017093.jpg
This document is page 6 of a manuscript, likely an autobiography by Alan Dershowitz, bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. In the text, Dershowitz discusses his dissatisfaction with his portrayal in the film 'Reversal of Fortune' (specifically a scene where he smashes a phone), recounting conversations with his son Elon (a co-producer) and actor Ron Silver about the difference between his public persona ('The Dersh Character') and his private self. He also references his previous books (*The Best Defense*, *Chutzpah*, *Reversal of Fortune*, *Reasonable Doubts*) and major cases including Von Bulow and O.J. Simpson.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017451.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir by Alan Dershowitz (dated draft 4.2.12), detailing his long-standing relationship with Benjamin Netanyahu. It recounts anecdotes including a humorous interaction with Jerusalem Mayor Ehud Olmert regarding a taxi, and a private meeting where Netanyahu jokingly asked Dershowitz if O.J. Simpson was guilty. It concludes with Netanyahu publicly praising Dershowitz at a conference, prompting a subsequent phone call from President Obama.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017443.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript draft (dated 4.2.12) written by Alan Dershowitz. He reflects on how his support for Israel has caused him to be mislabeled as a conservative despite his liberal views on other issues. He specifically refutes a quote by MJ Rosenberg, mentions his role in the O.J. Simpson case, and drafts a posthumous 'Letter to the Editor' defending his record of pro bono work and nuanced support for Israel.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017347.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a book manuscript (Chapter 15) written by a high-profile lawyer (likely Alan Dershowitz, given the context of the document dump). The text discusses the intersection of media and law, referencing the O.J. Simpson and Mike Tyson cases as examples of high-publicity trials. The author reflects on the concept of 'celebrity justice,' the impact of televised trials (mentioning Court TV), and defends their record of representing both famous and indigent clients.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017310.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir draft written by Alan Dershowitz, dated April 2, 2012. In the text, Dershowitz discusses his philosophy on criminal defense, explaining why he represents guilty clients and referencing his past work on high-profile cases like Claus Von Bulow and O.J. Simpson. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional inquiry.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017271.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a draft manuscript (dated 2012) written by an attorney (likely Alan Dershowitz based on context) regarding the legal case of Dr. William Sybers. The text details the background of the case, where Dr. Sybers was convicted of killing his wife, Kay, with succinylcholine in 1991. It discusses the initial investigation, the suspicious circumstances involving a missing syringe and an affair, and the subsequent suicide of the couple's son, Tim.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017270.jpg
This document appears to be a page (183) from a manuscript or book draft, likely written by Alan Dershowitz, dated April 2, 2012. The text recounts the forensic defense strategies used in the O.J. Simpson trial (specifically regarding blood on a sock) and the Claus Von Bulow appeal (disproving insulin injection theories). The author frames these cases as establishing his reputation as the 'go-to' lawyer for scientific defenses, leading to a new case with an 'eerie resemblance' to the Von Bulow matter.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017269.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir written by Alan Dershowitz (identified via the books mentioned in footnotes). The text details his involvement in the O.J. Simpson and Claus Von Bulow trials, specifically focusing on his strategy regarding the death penalty and the forensic defense involving DNA evidence. It mentions his collaboration with Barry Scheck, Peter Neufeld, and F. Lee Bailey.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018025.jpg
This document is a printout of a Law.com interview with Alan Dershowitz, filed as an exhibit in a 2019 court case (Case 1:19-cv-03377). In the interview, Dershowitz vehemently defends himself against 'heinous crimes' (implied to be related to the Epstein case), calling the situation the 'fight of my life' and citing his constant travel with his wife as evidence against the accusations. The document includes a footer indicating it is part of a House Oversight Committee production.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010512.jpg
This document contains a page from a book (page 170) which reproduces a formal letter dated May 1, 2006, from Palm Beach Police Chief Michael S. Reiter to State Attorney Barry E. Krischer. In the letter, Reiter submits probable cause affidavits for Jeffrey Epstein, Sarah Kellen, and Haley Robson. Significantly, Reiter expresses frustration that his calls have been ignored and urges Krischer to consider disqualifying his office from the prosecution due to the 'unusual course' the handling of the matter has taken.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015190.jpg
This document appears to be a narrative excerpt describing a post-trial event featuring attorney Johnnie Cochran. It details his speech regarding the O.J. Simpson trial and a subsequent interaction where a 'Dr. Schoenfeld' posed for a photo with Cochran while secretly displaying a sign that read 'O.J. DID'. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015189.jpg
A narrative excerpt describing the atmosphere surrounding the O.J. Simpson trials. The text details a specific event in 1997 where the narrator and their wife, Nancy, attended a private luncheon for criminal defense attorneys in Santa Monica as guests of Dr. Eugene Schoenfeld (Dr. Hip), where Johnnie Cochran was the speaker. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer, suggesting inclusion in a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021798.jpg
This document appears to be a compilation of media clippings, specifically from the New York Post, criticizing the plea deal Jeffrey Epstein received. It contrasts the aggressive investigation by Palm Beach Police with the State Attorney's decision to offer a lenient plea deal, attributing the outcome to Epstein's high-powered legal team (Dershowitz, Starr, Goldberger) and wealth. The text highlights that police had evidence (transcripts, phone messages) proving Epstein knew the victims' ages, but prosecutors were swayed by defense attacks on the victims' characters via MySpace logs.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021797.jpg
This document contains the text of two Palm Beach Post editorials from 2008 regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The editorials criticize Epstein's legal maneuvering, the delayed justice for his solicitation charges involving underage girls, and the aggressive tactics of his high-profile legal defense team.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021791.jpg
This document contains a Palm Beach Post article from August 2006 discussing the conflict between Police Chief Michael Reiter and State Attorney Barry Krischer regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case. It details Reiter's push for more serious charges against Epstein, the subsequent plea deal controversy, and personal attacks launched by Epstein's legal team against Reiter, including references to his divorce. The text criticizes the justice system's preferential treatment of wealthy defendants like Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021779.jpg
This document appears to be a House Oversight Committee record containing text from an editorial criticizing the handling of the Epstein case by State Attorney Barry Krischer, followed by a New York Post article from July 27, 2006. The text details how the plea deal allowed Epstein to avoid federal investigation and serious prison time despite police evidence (phone messages, school transcripts) proving he knew the victims were underage. It highlights the discrepancy between the police investigation's findings and the grand jury's decision to only charge him with soliciting a prostitute, noting he was released on $3,000 bail.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021768.jpg
This document contains text from news coverage regarding the legal proceedings against Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach. It details the controversial plea deal negotiated by his high-profile legal team, the dropping of federal investigations, and a 2006 New York Post article discussing his light charges compared to the evidence gathered by police.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021761.jpg
This document is an email chain initiated by Jeffrey Epstein in 2010, forwarding a 2008 email from Michael Reiter (Palm Beach Police) to a journalist named Margie. Reiter discusses leaking information about Epstein's plea deal to her and expresses frustration that her paper (Palm Beach Daily News) remained silent editorially. The email includes the full text of a critical Palm Beach Post editorial from July 2008, highlighting the 'different system of justice for the wealthy' and detailing Epstein's legal team.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021671.jpg
This Daily Beast article details the legal maneuvering surrounding the Jeffrey Epstein investigation, highlighting the tension between local police (Chief Reiter) and the State Attorney (Barry Krischer). It discusses the involvement of Epstein's associate Jean Luc Brunel and the MC2 agency in recruiting girls, the aggressive tactics of Epstein's legal team (including Alan Dershowitz) against police and victims, and the eventual non-prosecution agreement that allowed Epstein to avoid federal charges despite a draft indictment threatening 20 years in prison.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021550.jpg
This FBI document is a filing of a 'Palm Beach Post' newspaper clipping from July 7, 2008, detailing the plea deal and sentencing of Jeffrey Epstein. The article criticizes the justice system for allowing Epstein to serve only 18 months in county jail rather than state prison, highlighting the influence of his high-powered legal team (including Alan Dershowitz and Kenneth Starr) on State Attorney Barry Krischer. It notes that despite evidence including phone messages and transcripts proving he knew the victims were underage, federal investigations were dropped and his lawyers successfully attacked the victims' credibility.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030312.jpg
This August 14, 2006, article from the Palm Beach Post details the conflict surrounding the Jeffrey Epstein case. It highlights the criticism Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter leveled against State Attorney Barry Krischer for his lenient handling of the case, and the subsequent personal attacks on Reiter's character by Epstein's high-powered legal team. The article contrasts the police's push for serious charges with the eventual plea deal, which dropped a federal investigation and allowed Epstein to avoid significant prison time.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030303.jpg
This document combines two New York Post articles regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The main article, from July 27, 2008, heavily criticizes the lenient plea deal Epstein received in Florida, highlighting the influence of his high-powered legal team (including Alan Dershowitz and Kenneth Starr) and the failure of the state attorney, Barry Krischer, to secure a harsher penalty. A shorter, appended article from July 27, 2006, reports on Epstein's initial arrest for soliciting a prostitute and his subsequent release on $3,000 bail.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030302.jpg
This document contains two Palm Beach Post editorials from 2008 regarding Jeffrey Epstein's legal troubles. The first, from February 13, criticizes the lack of consequences for Epstein despite a 2006 indictment and details his high-profile legal team's efforts to dismiss allegations. The second editorial, from July 7, reports that Epstein finally admitted to luring a teenage girl and began serving an 18-month jail sentence as part of a plea deal.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity