Judge Failla
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-21 | N/A | Legal Conference | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-11-01 | N/A | Court Conference | Court | View |
| 2019-12-11 | N/A | Conference before Judge Failla (referred to as 'yesterday's conference' in Dec 12 email) | Court | View |
EFTA00030439.pdf
This document is an email chain from December 2019 between attorneys at Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP (Roberta Kaplan, Alex Conlon, Kate Doniger) and a redacted party. They discuss legal proceedings involving the Epstein Estate, specifically criticizing a 'draft protocol' received from Feinberg as a 'disaster' and referencing filings in the USVI. Notable discussions include a court transcript where it was stated that Epstein's brother is the sole beneficiary of the estate, and Judge Failla's comment regarding claims potentially worth 'millions upon millions of dollars.'
EFTA00030438.pdf
An email thread from December 2019 between attorneys at Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP and a redacted individual discussing a transcript from a legal conference. The discussion highlights Judge Failla's comments on potential damages being in the millions and specifically queries a statement made during the conference that identified Jeffrey Epstein's brother as the sole beneficiary of the estate.
EFTA00021266.pdf
This document is an internal email from the Chief of the Criminal Division at the SDNY US Attorney's Office outlining the schedule for the week of July 1, 2019. It notably lists 'Epstein indictment (PC)' as a schedule item for Tuesday, July 2, 2019, preceding Jeffrey Epstein's arrest on July 6, 2019. The schedule also details other legal proceedings, including the Ahuja trial, Ernesto Lopez sentencing, and various internal briefings.
EFTA00019570.pdf
This email chain from December 2019 between the Kaplan Hecker & Fink legal team and redacted recipients discusses court transcripts and the administration of the Epstein Estate. Key revelations include the confirmation that Mark Epstein (Jeffrey's brother) was identified by Estate lawyers (Bennet Moskowitz) as the sole beneficiary of the estate. The emails also mention that the 'Feinberg draft protocol' (likely regarding the victim compensation fund) was received and considered a 'disaster' by Kaplan's team.
DOJ-OGR-00002327.jpg
This legal document is an argument on behalf of defendant Ms. Maxwell, challenging the composition of the grand jury that indicted her. It cites an analysis by jury expert Jeffrey Martin from a similar case, United States v. Balde, which found significant underrepresentation of Black and Hispanic persons in the White Plains jury wheel. The argument posits that since Ms. Maxwell's grand jury was drawn from the same system, her Sixth Amendment right to a grand jury selected from a fair cross-section of the community was violated.
DOJ-OGR-00002327(1).jpg
This legal document argues that the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, was denied her Sixth Amendment right to a grand jury selected from a fair cross-section of the community. It cites a parallel case, U.S. v. Balde, and an expert analysis by Jeffrey Martin, which found significant underrepresentation of Black and Hispanic individuals in the White Plains jury wheel. Because Ms. Maxwell's grand jury was drawn from the same pool, the document contends this analysis applies to her case as well.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity