This document is a legal declaration by attorney Daniel Mullkoff submitted in the case of Teala Davies v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (Executors of the Epstein Estate). The declaration serves to introduce three exhibits into the court record: Epstein's Last Will and Testament (dated Aug 8, 2019), a complaint filed by the US Virgin Islands, and an Affidavit of Service from the case Araoz v. Epstein. The declaration opposes the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss.
This legal document is an affidavit filed on November 6, 2020, by Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey in the case of U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Comey certifies that the government attempted to negotiate in good faith with Maxwell's defense counsel for a two-week extension (from November 9 to November 23, 2020) for the production of documents seized from Jeffrey Epstein, but the parties were unable to reach an agreement. The extension was requested to allow an outside vendor to complete bates stamping and downloading of the electronic evidence.
This document is an Affidavit of Certification filed on July 28, 2020, in the criminal case of U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Assistant U.S. Attorney Alex Rossmiller affirms that the prosecution and defense have conferred on a proposed protective order but have been unable to resolve two areas of dispute. The first point of contention involves the defense's objection to the government's proposal regarding the referencing of witness and victim identities.
This document is the first page of an Affirmation in Opposition filed by Assistant US Attorney Maurene Comey on May 27, 2021. It argues against Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for pretrial release, citing a previous court order from April 27, 2021, that denied bail. The document establishes the legal venue in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals and identifies the key legal representatives involved.
This document is a legal affirmation filed on April 12, 2021, by Assistant U.S. Attorney Lara Pomerantz to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The filing formally opposes the appeal made by Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell regarding two prior District Court orders, dated December 28, 2020, and March 22, 2021, which denied her requests for pre-trial release.
This document is an affidavit of certification filed on October 6, 2020, by Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey in the case of U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Comey attests that the government attempted to negotiate with Maxwell's defense counsel to delay the disclosure of materials concerning victims of Jeffrey Epstein, but the defense refused to consent, leading to an inability to reach an agreement. The affidavit is filed pursuant to Local Criminal Rule 16.1 to certify this impasse to the court.
This legal document is an affirmation filed on April 26, 2023, by Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew A. Rohrbach in the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell. The U.S. Government is requesting permission from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals to file an oversized brief of up to 20,000 words to adequately respond to Maxwell's brief. The government also requests a 30-day extension for this filing, moving the deadline from May 30, 2023, to June 29, 2023.
This is an affidavit from David Parse, a defendant in case S3 09 Cr. 581 in the Southern District of New York, filed on August 7, 2012. Parse states that he only became aware of a potential issue regarding a juror named Conrad being a suspended lawyer after his legal team, the Brune firm, had already filed a motion for a new trial. He specifies learning this information after a conference call on July 15, 2011, and recalls his lawyer, Theresa Trzaskoma, had previously dismissed a concern about a prospective juror having the same name during jury selection.
This document is an affirmation by Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey, filed on May 27, 2021, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The filing formally opposes the renewed motion for pretrial release by defendant-appellant Ghislaine Maxwell. It references a previous court order from April 27, 2021, which had already denied Maxwell's request for bail and upheld the District Court's decision.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity