This document is an email chain from August 2019 between Holland S. Kastrin of the US Attorney's Office for New Mexico and an Assistant US Attorney from the Southern District of New York. They coordinate a conference call to discuss 'NM-related Epstein matters' shortly after Jeffrey Epstein's death. The correspondence highlights cooperation between the two federal districts regarding the Epstein investigation.
This document contains a chain of emails between the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of New Mexico (USANM) and the Southern District of New York (SDNY) spanning from August 2019 to May 2021. The correspondence focuses on coordinating the federal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, specifically regarding his activities and properties in New Mexico (Zorro Ranch). Key topics include an agreement with the NM State Attorney General to defer sex trafficking investigations to the feds, questions for victim interviews specific to NM, the impact of Ghislaine Maxwell's 2020 indictment on asset forfeiture, and media handling of allegations involving 'Jane Doe 15' and references to Bill Clinton.
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, presenting an argument for the admissibility of photographs taken long after the events in question. It cites legal precedents, including United States v. Causey (2014) and United States v. Smith (2020), to support the claim that such photos are relevant if they depict enduring scenes like buildings. The document also notes the defense's counter-argument regarding relevance and prejudice.
This document is the cover page for Exhibit N, a "Memorandum Opinion and Order" (Doc. 306) from the legal case of United States v. Dashawn Robertson in the District of New Mexico (Case Number 17-cr-02949-MV1). The document was filed on April 1, 2021, as part of a separate case filing (Case 21-770, Document 20-3).
This document is the signature page and certificate of service for a legal filing submitted by attorney David Oscar Markus of Markus/Moss PLLC on April 1, 2021. It references a separate case, United States v. Dashawn Robertson (District of New Mexico), likely as a citation or appendix item. The page bears a DOJ-OGR bates stamp.
Page 24 (PDF page 37) of a legal brief in Case 22-1426 (United States v. Maxwell appeal). The text argues against Maxwell's claim that Eleventh Circuit law should apply to the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), asserting that the court should follow its own precedents (Annabi) and that the governing law is that of the forum state. It cites multiple cases to support the application of local circuit law over the law where a plea agreement was originally negotiated.
This document is a signature page and Certificate of Service for a legal filing submitted by David Oscar Markus of Markus/Moss PLLC on April 1, 2021. It includes a citation for a separate case, 'United States v. Dashawn Robertson' (District of New Mexico), likely referenced as case law or an exhibit within the larger filing. The document bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp (DOJ-OGR-00019862).
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity