| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Donald Cole
|
Political commentator |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
jeffrey E.
|
Business associate |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey E.
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-11 | N/A | LHS pitched the concept (presumably RCV) to an unnamed individual. | Unknown | View |
| 2018-02-10 | N/A | Discussion of the resignation of the 'justice Dept number 3', identified as Rachel Brand, which w... | N/A | View |
| 2018-02-01 | N/A | Discussion of personnel changes at the FBI and Department of Justice, including the firing of Jam... | via email | View |
| 0008-02-01 | N/A | An email exchange occurred between Jeffrey E. (likely Epstein) and LHS (likely Larry Summers). Je... | N/A | View |
An email exchange between Eric Maskin and Lawrence Summers (LHS) discussing the merits and drawbacks of Ranked Choice Voting (RCV). Maskin argues RCV favors centrists and could have altered the 2016 election outcome for Clinton, while Summers raises concerns about complexity depressing turnout among specific demographics and mentions pitching the idea to an unnamed individual earlier that day.
This document is an email thread from May-June 2017 between Jeffrey Epstein and Larry Summers (LHS). They discuss political matters involving Donald Trump ('POTUS'), Jared Kushner, and their legal representation (Kasowitz, Gorelick), with Summers explicitly asking, 'How guilty is Donald?'. The thread also covers Epstein's personal grievance regarding Michael Klein allegedly attacking him using their friendship as a source.
An email thread between Larry Summers (LHS) and Jeffrey Epstein from May/June 2017. They discuss political legal maneuvers regarding Donald Trump ('Kaslowitz') and Jared Kushner ('Gorelick'), with Summers explicitly asking 'How guilty is Donald?'. Epstein complains about Michael Klein 'attacking' him, and sends a one-word email 'prospectus'.
An email thread between Lawrence Summers (LHS) and Jeffrey Epstein from May 2017. Summers provides a detailed breakdown of his views on Donald Trump's potential legal and ethical liabilities regarding Russia and his temperament. In the same thread, Epstein complains that Michael Klein has 'attacked' him using their prior friendship as a source, to which Summers responds sympathetically.
This document is an email chain from February 8-9, 2018, between Jeffrey E. (likely Epstein, from 'jeevacation@gmail.com') and LHS (likely Larry Summers, based on the signature). Jeffrey E. mentions a 'bill', prompting Summers to ask 'Goofy corrupt giveaways? Do tell.', to which Epstein simply replies 'wow'. The document, marked 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026470', contains redactions over Summers' contact details.
This document is an email chain from February 9-10, 2018, between Jeffrey Epstein (using jeevacation@gmail.com) and Larry Summers (LHS). They discuss the departures of high-level officials from the FBI and DOJ, including James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok, and Rachel Brand. The emails mention 'page and strokz', a planned call from 'Lisa', and the political significance of the resignations.
This document is an email from Larry Summers to an address associated with Jeffrey Epstein ('jeevacation@gmail.com') on September 12, 2018. Summers forwards an academic discussion he had with Eric Maskin the previous day about the effects of Ranked-Choice Voting (RCV) on voter turnout and candidate electability. The document is marked 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026321', indicating it is from a congressional investigation's files.
J responds, 'once you decide which way, we can set it up with option to purchase'.
J responds, 'once you decide which way, we can set it up with option to purchase'.
LHS reflects on a recent meeting with a woman, stating 'You were good.' He mentions their past as a 'couple' and decides he will only be her 'economics mentor'. He feels he is 'dodging a bullet' and that the right thing is to cut off contact, though he will miss her.
im a pretty good wing man , no? anymore, how great larry is comments and i would have had to barf. great fun
im a pretty good wing man , no? anymore, how great larry is comments and i would have had to barf. great fun
LHS reflects on a recent meeting with a woman, stating 'You were good.' He mentions their past as a 'couple' and decides he will only be her 'economics mentor'. He feels he is 'dodging a bullet' and that the right thing is to cut off contact, though he will miss her.
LHS reflects on a recent meeting with a woman, stating 'You were good.' He mentions their past as a 'couple' and decides he will only be her 'economics mentor'. He feels he is 'dodging a bullet' and that the right thing is to cut off contact, though he will miss her.
J responds, 'once you decide which way, we can set it up with option to purchase'.
im a pretty good wing man , no? anymore, how great larry is comments and i would have had to barf. great fun
Is there risk that u are staked our re tmrw night
I ll show it to her. U have returned to the press
The content of this initial email is not visible, but it initiated the thread and contained a confidentiality notice from 'JEE'.
Is there risk that u are staked our re tmrw night
The content of this initial email is not visible, but it initiated the thread and contained a confidentiality notice from 'JEE'.
short lived , no worry
I ll show it to her. U have returned to the press
short lived , no worry
Is there risk that u are staked our re tmrw night
short lived , no worry
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity