Palm Beach County, Florida
LocationRelationship Network
Jeffrey Epstein Part 16 of 16.PDF
This document set consists primarily of 'Deleted Page Information Sheets' indicating that 515 pages of records have been withheld from the release, citing Grand Jury secrecy (b3-1) and privacy (b6, b7C). The visible content includes three FBI FD-340 forms (Receipt for Property) dated April 9, 2008. These receipts document the FBI's Miami/Palm Beach office receiving 'Subpoena Results for telephone #' (number redacted). The 'Grand Jury Material' box is checked on the receipts.
Epstein_Part_12_(Redacted).pdf
This document is an excerpt from a federal indictment (Case No. 00-8124CR - HURLEY) from the Southern District of Florida, detailing charges of mail fraud and bank fraud against an individual named HURLEY. The defendant, a mortgage broker at Mortgage Express, Inc., is accused of submitting false and fraudulent information, including fictitious leases and false verifications of employment/deposit, to financial institutions like Bank of America, Republic Consumer Lending Group, and Ohio Savings Bank to obtain mortgage financing for himself and customers.
Epstein_Part_22.pdf
This document contains a partial transcript from a plea conference for Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach County, Florida, on June 30, 2008, where the court detailed strict no-contact orders with victims. It also includes a declaration from Adam D. Horowitz dated September 16, 2009, describing a stipulation for Jeffrey Epstein not to physically attend Jane Doe No. 4's deposition, but to listen remotely, and an incident where Epstein crossed paths with Jane Doe No. 4 in a lobby.
082.pdf
A Notice of Hearing filed in the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County, Florida, regarding the case State of Florida vs. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 2008CF009381A). The document, signed by Epstein's attorney Jack A. Goldberger on December 16, 2009, schedules a hearing for December 18, 2009, before Judge Jeffrey Colbath to discuss a 'Motion to Authorize Travel'. The notice is addressed to Barbara Burns at the State Attorney's Office and Carmen Sloane at the Department of Corrections.
081.pdf
This document is a Motion for Authorization to Travel filed on December 17, 2009, in Palm Beach County, Florida, on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein requests permission to travel to New York for three days to meet with his attorney, Harry Susman, review confidential documents, and interview witnesses related to ongoing litigation. The motion notes that his community control officer, Carmen Sloane, has no objection to the travel provided dates are cleared in advance.
076.pdf
This document is a 'Notice of Hearing' filed in the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County, Florida, for the case State of Florida vs. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 2008CF009381A). Defense attorney Jack A. Goldberger notifies State Attorney Barbara Burns of a hearing scheduled for November 30, 2009, before Judge Jeffrey Colbath regarding a 'Motion for Travel'. The document was filed on November 25, 2009.
074.pdf
This is a 'Order of No Contact' issued by the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County, Florida, against Jeffrey Epstein. Filed on November 18, 2009, but retroactive to June 30, 2008 ('nunc pro tunc'), it prohibits Epstein from contacting a redacted alleged victim. A handwritten exception allows Epstein's attorneys or agents to have contact solely for the purposes of a civil lawsuit.
069.pdf
This document is an 'Agreed Order' from the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida, dated October 16, 2009, in the case of State of Florida vs. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 2008CF009381A). The order, signed by Judge Jeffrey Colbath, states that the 'mandatory public service' requirement previously marked on Epstein's community control order was a clerical error and is thereby deleted. The decision was based on an agreement between Epstein's attorney Jack Goldberger and ASA Barbara Burns after reviewing the plea agreement and transcript.
066.pdf
This document is a 'Notice of Non-Agreement' filed by the State of Florida on September 11, 2009, objecting to a proposed 'Agreed Order' submitted by Jeffrey Epstein's defense counsel. The defense sought to modify Epstein's community control conditions to remove 'mandatory public service' (claiming it was a clerical error) and to authorize business travel outside Florida. The State Attorney explicitly rejected the agreement and requested an evidentiary hearing.
058.pdf
This document is a legal response filed on behalf of an unnamed Intervener opposing Jeffrey Epstein's motion to stay the release of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The filing argues that the NPA is a public record that was never properly sealed and that Epstein failed to demonstrate the necessary 'irreparable harm' or 'likelihood of success' required to grant a stay. The document was filed in the 15th Judicial Circuit Court of Palm Beach County in July 2009.
053.pdf
This document is a court order from June 26, 2009, issued by Judge Jeffrey J. Colbath in the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County, Florida. The order denies Jeffrey Epstein's motion to stay the disclosure of his Non-Prosecution Agreement and sets a deadline of July 2, 2009, for the Clerk to release the documents, allowing time for an appeal to the 4th DCA. The document includes a service list of attorneys involved, including U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta and defense attorneys like Jack Goldberger.
047.pdf
Legal motion filed on June 25, 2009, by Jeffrey Epstein's defense team (Critton, Pike, Goldberger) in Palm Beach County Circuit Court. Epstein requests a stay on the disclosure of his Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) pending an appellate review, arguing that unsealing the document would cause irreparable harm to privacy rights and innocent third parties. The motion opposes efforts by the Palm Beach Post and a redacted non-party to unseal these court records.
041.pdf
This document is a 'Motion to Make Court Records Confidential' filed by Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys on June 11, 2009, in the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County. The defense seeks to maintain the seal on the Non-Prosecution Agreement (filed July 2008) and its Addendum, citing threats to the administration of justice and privacy rights of third parties. The motion references interventions by the Palm Beach Post and a non-party identified as 'EW' (whose name is redacted in one section) seeking access to these records.
039.pdf
This document is a court order from the 15th Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida, dated June 10, 2009, in the case of State v. Epstein (Case No. 2008 CF 9381). The judge granted a motion for intervention by non-parties, including the Palm Beach Post, regarding motions to vacate and unseal records. The order sets a deadline for the defendant to respond by June 12, 2009, and schedules a hearing for June 25, 2009, noting the court may view documents 'in camera' (privately).
037.pdf
A court order from the Circuit Court of the 15th Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida, dated June 10, 2009, in the case of State v. Epstein (Case No. 2008 CF 9381 AXX). Moving parties, including the Palm Beach Post and a redacted nonparty, were granted intervention regarding motions to vacate, intervene, and unseal. The court ordered the defendant to file a response by June 12, 2009, and set a hearing for June 25, 2009, noting the court may view documents in camera.
035.pdf
This document is a motion filed on June 2, 2009, by The Palm Beach Post seeking to intervene in the criminal case against Jeffrey Epstein to unseal a non-prosecution agreement and its addendum. The Post argues that the sealing was improper, lacked necessary legal findings, and that the documents are of significant public interest given the accusations of soliciting minors. The document cites numerous civil lawsuits against Epstein and criticizes the secrecy surrounding his plea deal.
034.pdf
This document is a motion filed on June 3, 2009, by a redacted nonparty (a victim of Jeffrey Epstein) seeking to unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and its addendum in the Florida state criminal case. The motion argues the sealing violated Florida judicial rules and public policy, and that the documents are material to the victim's pending civil suit. Exhibits include judgments of conviction against Epstein for solicitation and procuring a minor, sealing orders from 2008, and transcripts from the June 30, 2008 plea conference where the existence of the federal NPA was discussed in open court.
013.pdf
A 'Plea in the Circuit Court' document from the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida, dated June 30, 2008. In this document, Jeffrey Epstein (represented by attorney Jack Goldberger) waives various legal rights, including the right to a jury trial and the right to remain silent, in relation to case numbers 06-CF 009454 AMB and 08-CF 009381 AMB. Notably, in section 11, Epstein specifically selects a program that is 'NOT spiritually based' regarding his sentence/probation.
012.pdf
This document is page 2 of a sentencing order from the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida, pertaining to defendant Jeffrey Epstein (Case Number 2008CF9387AXX). Dated June 30, 2008, and signed by Judge Deborah D. Pucillo, the order mandates that Epstein serve a period of 12 months on community control under the supervision of the Department of Corrections.
011.pdf
This document is a Sentencing Order from the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida, dated June 30, 2008. Jeffrey Epstein is sentenced to 18 months in the custody of the Sheriff of Palm Beach County (county jail) for Case Number 2008CF 9381AXX. The sentence is ordered to run consecutively to the sentence in Case Number 2006CF 9454AXX.
009.pdf
This document is a formal Judgment from the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County, Florida, dated June 30, 2008. It records that Jeffrey E. Epstein entered a plea of guilty to the crime of 'Procuring Person Under 18 for Prostitution' (Statute 796.03), a second-degree felony. The court adjudicated him guilty of this crime.
016-05.pdf
This document is a motion filed on June 30, 2010, by Plaintiff Jane Doe requesting the modification of a court order regarding an upcoming settlement conference with Jeffrey Epstein. Doe requests that Epstein be kept in a secure, separate room to prevent any contact or intimidation, citing his status as a convicted sex offender and previous incidents where he intimidated victims, specifically Jane Doe No. 4, during court proceedings. The motion references Epstein's 2008 guilty plea and strict no-contact orders issued by both state and federal courts.
020.pdf
This document is a Motion to Dismiss filed by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team on June 16, 2010, in the case of L.M. v. Epstein. Epstein's lawyers argue the case should be dismissed because the plaintiff failed to serve the complaint within the required 120 days (Rule 4(m)). Furthermore, the motion alleges that the complaint filed by L.M. (represented by Bradley Edwards) was used as a prop in Scott Rothstein's massive $1.2 billion Ponzi scheme to lure investors with fabricated settlement agreements. The document cites depositions where L.M. contradicts allegations made in her complaint regarding sexual acts and travel.
010.pdf
Declaration by Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on June 30, 2016, in the Southern District of Florida. The document lists 18 exhibits (A-R) supporting Maxwell's opposition to Bradley J. Edwards' motion to quash a subpoena. Several exhibits are filed under seal, while others include procedural documents from related cases (Cassell v. Dershowitz, Epstein v. Rothstein, Jane Doe v. US) and communications regarding discovery and subpoenas.
061.pdf
This document is Jeffrey Epstein's Answer and Affirmative Defenses to a civil complaint filed by Jane Doe II in the Southern District of Florida in October 2009. Epstein pleads the Fifth Amendment against self-incrimination in response to most factual allegations. He asserts multiple affirmative defenses, claiming the plaintiff consented to the acts, that he believed she was 18 years or older, and that the claims are barred by the statute of limitations and various constitutional challenges to the retroactivity and application of 18 U.S.C. §2255.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity