Hugo Black

Person
Mentions
6
Relationships
2
Events
1
Documents
3

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
2 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Cohen
Judicial
5
1
View
person Felix Frankfurter
Business associate
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A A heated exchange (possibly apocryphal) between Justices Hugo Black and Felix Frankfurter during ... Supreme Court View

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016500.jpg

This document is page 13 of a legal filing arguing for the unsealing of appellate briefs related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. The text asserts a strong public interest in transparency to understand why the District Attorney's Office, led by DA Vance, argued for lenient treatment of Epstein. It cites various legal precedents regarding the presumption of openness in court records and mentions that Vance has faced criticism for favoring wealthy defendants.

Legal brief / motion (page 13)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017174.jpg

This document appears to be a page (page 87) from a manuscript draft, likely a book on constitutional law or civil liberties (possibly by Alan Dershowitz given the context of the House Oversight production). The text analyzes the First and Fourteenth Amendments, the incorporation doctrine, and the expansion of free speech prohibitions from just 'Congress' to the entire 'government.' It references Justice Hugo Black and the case of Cohen v. the United States (referring to the 'Fuck the draft' jacket case, usually known as Cohen v. California).

Manuscript draft / legal analysis
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017173.jpg

This document appears to be a page (page 86) from a manuscript draft, dated April 2, 2012, bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. The text is a philosophical and legal essay discussing the value of dissent, analyzing the First Amendment through the lens of a debate between Justices Hugo Black and Felix Frankfurter regarding the words 'Congress' and 'no.' The author (writing in the first person) expresses admiration for biblical and historical figures who challenged authority.

Manuscript draft / book chapter
2025-11-19
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity