agent
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Grand Jury Testimony where agent described Maxwell meeting Jane Doe Number One. | SDFL (implied) | View |
| N/A | Trial | An ongoing trial is mentioned, for which exhibits are being prepared and presented. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2020-06-29 | N/A | Swearing out of the arrest warrant for Ghislaine Maxwell | Remote/Teleconference | View |
| 2020-06-26 | N/A | Scheduled call at 9:10 AM to swear out the warrant with an agent. | Phone Call | View |
| 2020-06-26 | N/A | Scheduled call between AUSA, Agent, and Judge Gorenstein to swear out search warrant. | Phone call | View |
| 2020-06-26 | N/A | Scheduled call to swear out warrant. | Phone Call | View |
| 2019-07-06 | N/A | Client served with Grand Jury Subpoena by an Agent. | Unknown | View |
| 2019-07-06 | N/A | Agent served grand jury subpoena to client. | Florida (implied) | View |
DOJ-OGR-00017668.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a legal argument during the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The discussion, involving attorneys Ms. Menninger, Ms. Moe, and the judge, centers on whether a witness's statement of "I don't remember" can be treated as inconsistent with a prior statement made to an agent concerning an individual named Epstein. The parties debate the proper legal procedure for questioning a witness about such a potential inconsistency.
DOJ-OGR-00008484.jpg
This document is page 28 of a court filing (Document 562) dated December 17, 2021, from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains Jury Instruction No. 20 regarding Count Four: Transportation of a Minor to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity. The text defines the legal requirements for proving Ms. Maxwell knowingly transported the victim 'Jane' across state lines or internationally, noting that personal transportation is not required if she made the arrangements (e.g., buying tickets) and that the victim's consent is irrelevant.
DOJ-OGR-00008378.jpg
This document is a legal filing (page 5 of 9) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), dated December 15, 2021. It argues against the defense's attempt to call attorney Scarola to the stand to testify about his client Carolyn's cooperation with the government and the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (EVCP), citing attorney-client privilege and Federal Rule of Evidence 403 (prejudice/confusion). The text asserts that Carolyn was unaware of when the EVCP began accepting claims when she decided to cooperate, negating the defense's theory of financial bias.
DOJ-OGR-00018607.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, where an attorney, Ms. Menninger, argues that a potential sequestration order violation has occurred. She expresses concern that a witness, Brian, was told information by another person, Jane, about a document shown during testimony. Ms. Menninger requests that the court question Brian under oath, outside the jury's presence, to determine the extent of the communication before he testifies.
DOJ-OGR-00018469.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a dialogue between the judge (THE COURT) and three attorneys (Mr. Everdell, Mr. Rohrbach, and Ms. Pomerantz) regarding an objection to having an agent testify about exhibits. The discussion clarifies that the agent in question is the one who conducted a search, not the current witness, after which the judge concludes the matter and calls for the witness and jury to enter.
DOJ-OGR-00019134.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between a lawyer, Ms. Moe, and the judge (The Court). Ms. Moe argues for using an agent to present exhibits to the jury to protect sensitive information, describing it as a 'streamlined testimony'. The Court expresses concern, noting that this role differs from a typical summary agent witness who testifies about their own investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00016768.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. The discussion involves the Judge, prosecutor Ms. Comey, and defense attorney Mr. Everdell debating the relevance of questioning a case agent about the timeline of allegations investigated. Ms. Comey argues that the investigation was broader than the specific charges and that the defense can argue the lack of evidence (DNA, phone records) without putting the agent on the stand.
DOJ-OGR-00025197.jpg
This document is a detailed event log for Saturday, August 10, 2019, chronicling the immediate aftermath of inmate Epstein's death. It records the timeline of notifications to officials like the AUSA and Judge Berman, the arrival of investigative bodies such as the FBI and OIG, and key actions including processing the body at Beekman Hospital and securing evidence like computer hard drives from the Special Housing Unit (SHU).
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity