This document is a page from a professional resume or curriculum vitae for Stephen Gillers, detailing his public lectures and service activities. It lists his participation in PBS series, numerous lectures on legal ethics, and significant roles within the American Bar Association and as a consultant for the New Jersey Supreme Court. The activities span from 1989 to at least 2009, highlighting a long career in legal ethics and public service.
This legal letter, dated July 2, 2021, from Cohen & Gresser LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan, cites the recent Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision vacating William Henry Cosby Jr.'s conviction. The letter argues that this precedent supports Ghislaine Maxwell's supplemental motion to dismiss charges, as the government allegedly failed to honor a non-prosecution agreement, similar to the District Attorney's office in the Cosby case. It details the circumstances of the Cosby case, including Andrea Constand's allegations and the initial decision by DA Bruce Castor not to prosecute due to insufficient evidence.
This document is an email from Michael Keough dated August 5, 2016, circulating a news report to a group including Steptoe attorneys Reid Weingarten and Michael Miller. The text details a Washington news conference where the attorneys criticized the Turkish government's evidence against cleric Fethullah Gulen, citing a dismissed 2015 Pennsylvania court case that relied on claims of 'coded orders' in sermons and TV scripts. The document highlights the tension between the U.S. and Turkey regarding Gulen's extradition following a coup attempt.
An email exchange between Eric Maskin and Lawrence Summers (LHS) discussing the merits and drawbacks of Ranked Choice Voting (RCV). Maskin argues RCV favors centrists and could have altered the 2016 election outcome for Clinton, while Summers raises concerns about complexity depressing turnout among specific demographics and mentions pitching the idea to an unnamed individual earlier that day.
This document appears to be a page from a political strategy memo proposing a third-party presidential run. It argues for a 'Democrat-leaning' but moderate candidate who can win specific swing states and pledges to serve only a single four-year term to tackle major issues like Social Security and climate change without re-election concerns. The memo also emphasizes the need for high-entertainment value in the campaign, suggesting involvement from media figures like Stephen Colbert and SNL writers.
This document is a page from a House Oversight report (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026494) arguing that the 'Crossfire' (Crossfire Hurricane) investigation into the Trump campaign was politically motivated rather than based on national security. It cites a 2012 Eric Holder memo regarding DOJ impartiality during election years and contrasts the handling of the Clinton email server investigation with the Trump-Russia probe. It asserts there was no discernible evidence of collusion when Crossfire was launched and notes that the Clinton campaign funded the Steele dossier.
The text argues that political bias among FBI officials tainted the Russia investigation and the subsequent appointment of Special Counsel Robert Mueller, likening the situation to the "fruit of a poisonous tree" legal doctrine. It cites several Supreme Court precedents regarding due process to suggest that such governmental bias creates an unfair process that should invalidate legal proceedings.
This document is page 42 of a House Oversight report regarding foreign influence in academia, specifically focusing on Chinese Confucius Institutes (CIs). It details political and legislative pressure (including the 2019 NDAA) leading to the closure of CIs at universities like Texas A&M and UNF, alongside criticism from academic associations regarding transparency and academic freedom. The report also analyzes Hanban textbooks used in these programs, noting they generally lack overt political content, with one exception featuring a speech by Barack Obama.
This document discusses proposed legal rule changes aimed at protecting crime victims' interests regarding subpoenas and the venue of prosecution. It outlines a requirement for preliminary court screening of subpoenas to ensure relevance and reasonableness, and proposes amending Rule 18 to consider the convenience of victims when setting the place of trial. The text argues these changes protect victim privacy without infringing on the legitimate interests of the government or defendants.
A presentation slide produced by Deutsche Bank's Global Public Affairs division (Francis J. Kelly) analyzing 2016 US Presidential election polling data from Quinnipiac College. The document details voter word associations for Clinton, Bush, and Trump (e.g., 'Liar' for Clinton, 'Arrogant' for Trump) and examines election spreads in swing states like Florida, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional investigation, likely related to Deutsche Bank's ties to political figures.
This document is a page from a legal filing by attorney David Schoen, bearing a House Oversight Committee stamp. It presents a legal argument citing a 2007 Utah Law Review article and various precedents (Ritchie, Brady, Hach) to argue that constitutional discovery obligations apply only to the government/state actors, not to third parties or crime victims. The text specifically argues against the ability of defendants to subpoena medical or psychiatric records from third-party witnesses who are not state agents.
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article found in the files of attorney David Schoen (produced for House Oversight). The text analyzes legal procedures regarding 'ex parte' subpoenas, specifically criticizing proposals that would allow defense attorneys to subpoena victim records without notice, using the Elizabeth Smart kidnapping case and Pennsylvania rape counselor statutes as examples of how third parties handle confidential victim information. It argues that current or proposed rules regarding the protection of defense 'strategy' are haphazard and often detrimental to victim privacy.
This document is a page from a legal filing that reproduces a Vanity Fair article discussing the financial relationship between Jeffrey Epstein and Steven Hoffenberg. It details allegations of stock manipulation schemes, questionable investments, and the failure of regulators to depose Epstein during investigations into Hoffenberg's fraud.
This document is a page from a legal opinion (cited as 2012 WL 257568) regarding litigation related to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks ('In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001'). It discusses the dismissal of intentional tort claims (assault, battery, IIED), arguments regarding statutes of limitations in New York versus Virginia and Pennsylvania, and equitable tolling due to the clandestine nature of the conspiracy involving al-Qaeda. The document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023406', indicating it was produced as part of a US House Oversight Committee investigation, likely included in a production by a financial institution or entity being investigated for connections to high-profile cases, though Jeffrey Epstein is not explicitly named in the text of this specific page.
This document page discusses the banning of a publication titled "Texas Dept. of Criminal Justice, Publication Review" from Death Row due to fears it would cause prison disruption. It specifically cites two passages as problematic: an excerpt from Jackie Robinson's autobiography expressing anger at racism, and a historical account of race riots following Jack Johnson's boxing victory over Jim Jeffries.
This document is page 16 of a 'Cowen Collaborative Insights' market research report dated February 25, 2019. It analyzes U.S. hemp production, providing a statistical table of planted acres by state for 2017 and 2018, showing a significant increase in total acreage. The text discusses economic challenges for the hemp CBD market, including supply saturation and seed costs. While marked with a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates number, this specific page contains no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or victims; it appears to be part of a larger financial document production.
This document contains two slides from a KPCB presentation (likely Mary Meeker's 'USA Inc.' report) analyzing government efficiency and cost-cutting measures through outsourcing and automation. It presents financial data spanning 1993-2010, detailing specific savings achieved by state governments (MO, PA, FL, TX) and organizations like the Red Cross and Port Authority of NY/NJ. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021017' Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a production to the House Oversight Committee.
This document is a data analysis report titled 'US Election Report' bearing a House Oversight stamp. It details sentiment analysis derived from approximately 3 million tweets collected from November 1st (presumably 2016), comparing Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. It provides positive/neutral/negative sentiment percentages, overall winning chances favoring Trump (55%), and a breakdown of projected polling or winning chances across various specific US states.
This document, labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033534', is a printout containing two separate articles: one details the life and death of Semyon Rosenfeld, a Sobibor revolt survivor, and the other profiles Joe Biden, recounting a 1973 meeting with Golda Meir. Despite the query's framing, the document's contents are unrelated to Jeffrey Epstein and contain no information about him or his associates.
This document is an email chain from September 11, 2018, between Larry Summers and Eric Maskin concerning the political implications of Ranked-Choice Voting (RCV). They discuss RCV's potential to promote centrism, its hypothetical effect on the 2016 US presidential election, and concerns about its complexity depressing turnout among minority and low-income voters. Although requested in the context of an Epstein-related query, this document contains no mention of Jeffrey Epstein, his associates (other than Summers in a non-Epstein context), or any related activities.
This document, labeled HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026306, is a political strategy memo outlining a plan for a hypothetical third-party presidential candidate. The strategy suggests a centrist candidate who can win states from both parties, leverages entertainment to capture voter attention in a media environment shaped by Donald Trump, and pledges to serve a single four-year "fix-it" term. Although provided in the context of an Epstein-related query, this specific page contains no mention of Jeffrey Epstein or any known associates, focusing solely on US political strategy.
This document, labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026300', is a political strategy memo from circa mid-2018 outlining a plan for a successful third-party presidential candidate. The strategy requires a celebrity candidate with high name recognition to compete against Donald Trump by winning over Hillary Clinton's 2016 states plus a combination of Trump states, all while leveraging entertainment-style media, potentially involving figures like Stephen Colbert. The content of the document itself does not mention Jeffrey Epstein or related matters.
This document, from a source labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT', presents a legal argument that the special counsel investigation led by Robert Mueller was fundamentally tainted and a violation of due process. The author contends that the preceding FBI 'Crossfire' investigation was politically motivated, and this bias rendered all subsequent activities, including Mueller's appointment and findings, as 'fruit of a poisonous tree'. The text does not contain any information related to Jeffrey Epstein or his associates; its entire focus is on the Mueller investigation and related legal precedents.
This document is a post-election analysis from Washington Council Ernst & Young dated November 9, 2016. It details Donald Trump's victory over Hillary Clinton in the presidential election, the Republicans retaining control of Congress, and outlines potential policy agendas and political challenges, such as filling the Supreme Court vacancy. The document contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is an email chain from March 2017 between Jeffrey E. (likely Epstein) and Reid Weingarten. The emails discuss a client named Richard Ireland in relation to 'corruption', speculate that 'trump' leaked documents before a witness cross-examination, and mention a 'licencing' problem involving 'jack morris' and 'marino'. The confidentiality notice claims the communication is the property of 'JEE'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity