This document contains scanned telephone message books from the Palm Beach State Attorney's Office (likely Barry Krischer's office) spanning from 2005 to 2009. The messages document high-frequency communication between the State Attorney ('BK' or 'Mr. K') and Epstein's defense team (Alan Dershowitz, Jack Goldberger, Bruce Lyons), as well as significant media inquiries regarding Epstein's indictment, prison sentence, and potential charges in the Virgin Islands. A critical handwritten note advises 'No don't give to Feds our case unless they take all,' highlighting the jurisdictional tension between state and federal prosecutors.
This document is a transcript of a telephone conference held on August 26, 2021, before Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman in the case of Jane Doe v. Darren K. Indyke et al. The proceedings cover case management matters, including setting a scheduling order for discovery, discussing a forthcoming motion to dismiss, and granting the plaintiff's motion to proceed anonymously. The court also encourages the parties to engage in settlement discussions and outlines procedures for status reports.
This document is a forwarded email chain dated August 10, 2019, originating from a BuzzFeed News reporter named Jane. The reporter is inquiring with an unknown agency (likely emergency services or a hospital) about a suspected leak, alleging that a responding paramedic posted details of Jeffrey Epstein's death on 4chan 45 minutes before mainstream media reported it.
An email from BuzzFeed News reporter Jane Lytvynenko dated August 10, 2019, sent to an unidentified recipient (likely an official agency). Lytvynenko is investigating allegations that a paramedic involved in the response to Jeffrey Epstein's death leaked information on 4chan 45 minutes before the story broke on ABC News.
An email dated May 29, 2020, from attorney Robert Glassman of Panish Shea & Boyle to a redacted recipient. The email shares a link to an ABC News article regarding the difficulty an alleged victim is facing in locating Ghislaine Maxwell to serve a legal complaint.
This document is an internal email digest titled 'SDNY Press Clips' dated July 28, 2020. It compiles links to news articles concerning Attorney General William Barr's testimony, Michael Cohen, and ongoing developments in the Ghislaine Maxwell/Jeffrey Epstein case, specifically regarding privacy over nude images and new accusers. It also includes general interest stories involving New Jersey politics and Homeland Security actions in Portland.
An email chain between USANYS (Southern District of New York) staff dated May 6, 2020, discussing a press inquiry from ABC News. ABC reported a tip that 'something is imminent' regarding Epstein coconspirators. A USANYS staff member responds 'Negative' to the inquiry about whether anything was happening at that time.
An email chain from February 2020 originating from the SDNY U.S. Attorney's Office discussing a publicity stunt by attorney Gloria Allred. Allred hired a school bus to circle Buckingham Palace with a 'wanted' poster asking Prince Andrew to contact the FBI regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case. The email includes a textual description of the event and an attached photograph of the bus.
This document is an email chain from February 2020 involving an inquiry by journalist Thomas Volscho (ABC News) to the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). Volscho is asking about a USMS investigation initiated in January 2019 regarding Jeffrey Epstein's potential violation of International Megan's Law (IML) for failing to report international travel. The document includes an embedded screenshot of a USMS 'Report of Investigation' dated January 8, 2019, which states that Epstein traveled frequently internationally on private planes (specifically mentioning unreported trips to Vienna and Monaco) and may have violated Title 18 Section 2250(b).
This document is an internal Department of Justice email dated September 9, 2020, containing a digest of press clippings relevant to the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The clips cover various topics including legal proceedings involving Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein documents in the US Virgin Islands, as well as news items concerning Robert Hadden, William Barr, and other political figures. The email was prepared by Nicholas Biase of the SDNY Public Affairs office.
This document is an email thread from July 24, 2020, originating from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). It contains a digest of 'SDNY Press Clippings' with links to news articles about Global Entry, Michael Cohen, Wirecard, and Ghislaine Maxwell, specifically regarding the unsealing of records in her defamation case. A respondent replies to the distribution list stating, 'Love the header!'
This document is an email chain from October 19, 2007, discussing legal strategy surrounding Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondents discuss a lawsuit filed in New York that has reached national news (Fox and ABC), expressing belief that this lawsuit is delaying Epstein's change of plea. The emails reveal that 'Epstein's camp' allegedly planted false stories to discredit victims and are attempting to resolve the civil lawsuit before the guilty plea to avoid it being used against him. The chain also references communicating with a 'Jay' regarding a proposed letter and asking Judge Davis about the Special Master's selection.
This legal document, a letter from the law office of Bobbi C. Sternheim, argues that their client, Ghislaine Maxwell, is being subjected to "draconian" and punitive pretrial detention conditions. The letter posits that these harsh measures are not related to Maxwell's own conduct but are a direct result of the government's attempt to repair its reputation following the suicide of Jeffrey Epstein in federal custody. The attorney details failed attempts to resolve these issues through internal prison channels and claims the conditions are impeding Maxwell's ability to prepare her legal defense.
This document is page 3 of a legal filing by attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell, dated December 7, 2020. The letter argues that Maxwell is facing unduly harsh conditions, including solitary isolation, as a result of the Bureau of Prisons' incompetence and embarrassment over Jeffrey Epstein's suicide. Sternheim asserts that Maxwell is an 'exemplary detainee' and calls for Warden Tellez to address the concerns regarding her confinement, which are allegedly interfering with her legal defense.
This legal document, filed by the law office of Bobbi C. Sternheim on behalf of Ms. Maxwell, argues against the restrictive conditions of her confinement at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). The filing contends that these measures, including constant surveillance and repeated searches, are an overreaction to the BOP's failure to prevent Jeffrey Epstein's death, rather than being based on any specific risk posed by Maxwell. The document also raises concerns about Ms. Maxwell's exposure to COVID-19 and the erasure of her legal emails, quoting then-Attorney General William Barr's stated interest in ensuring she makes it to trial.
This is a letter dated October 29, 2020, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Warden Heriberto Tellez of the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). The attorney is writing on behalf of her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, to protest the 'extraordinarily restrictive conditions' of her detention, which are compared to solitary confinement and death row. The letter argues that these harsh measures are not a response to any threat Maxwell poses but are an overreaction by the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) to its failure to prevent the death of Jeffrey Epstein at a different facility.
This document details the conflicts that arose immediately following the signing of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), focusing on the September-October 2007 period. The central issue was the selection of an attorney representative for the victims, where AUSA Villafaña's choice, Lefkowitz, was challenged by her colleague Sloman due to a potential conflict of interest, as Lefkowitz was recommended by an AUSA Villafaña was dating.
This document is page 6 of a legal filing addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan on July 21, 2020, arguing that lawyers Boies and McCawley made prejudicial extrajudicial statements in ABC News interviews regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. The filing quotes the lawyers describing Maxwell as a 'central figure' who 'worked hand-in-hand' with Epstein and suggesting other participants should be worried. The author requests a court order to prohibit further public comments that could damage Maxwell's right to a fair trial.
This document is page 5 of a legal filing (Document 614) submitted on February 24, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The text, likely from the NACDL, argues that high-profile trials create pressure on jurors to convict for fame or to avoid public scorn, citing the 'stealth juror' phenomenon. It specifically alleges that 'Juror 50' in the Maxwell trial used social media to express appreciation for gratitude received for convicting Maxwell, and compares the situation to historical cases like O.J. Simpson and Rodney King.
This document, a page from a legal filing dated March 1, 2022, argues that jurors in high-profile trials often seek to profit from their experience, becoming 'instant celebrities'. It cites numerous examples from the Michael Jackson, O.J. Simpson, Scott Peterson, Derek Chauvin, and Robert Durst trials where jurors sold trial materials, received book advances, gave paid interviews, and secured employment as consultants. The filing suggests that the proliferation of media has increased the opportunities and incentives for jurors to capitalize on their service, potentially influencing their behavior.
This document is page 131 from a book (likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein), stamped as part of a House Oversight Committee production. It analyzes Edward Snowden's flight to Moscow, disputing his timeline regarding when his passport was revoked to suggest he was 'exfiltrated' by Russian intelligence rather than trapped. The text also references the CIA, NSA, and FBI's tracking of Snowden and includes a reference to an interview with former CIA counterintelligence chief James Jesus Angleton.
This document is a page from a House Oversight report detailing the timeline and circumstances of Edward Snowden's flight from Hong Kong to Russia in 2013. It refutes Snowden's claim that he was trapped in Russia by the US, presenting evidence that his passport was revoked before he left Hong Kong and that the Russian government (specifically Putin and Aeroflot) facilitated his travel. It also implicates WikiLeaks in funding and assisting his escape and cites Russian officials claiming Snowden shared intelligence with Russian security services.
This document is a page from a court filing (Case 1:19-cv-03377) containing a statement, likely by Alan Dershowitz, refuting sexual misconduct allegations made by Virginia Roberts (Giuffre). The author cites travel records, Secret Service logs, and an independent review by a former FBI Director to claim Roberts fabricated stories about him, Bill Clinton, and the Gores for financial gain. The text mentions sealed evidence, including emails and a tape recording, that the author claims prove he was deliberately framed.
This document is a forensic extraction of an iMessage log between 'jee' (jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual from June 14, 2019. The conversation consists of sharing news links regarding President Trump's internal polling against Joe Biden and news regarding China, with brief commentary on the polling numbers in Wisconsin.
A log of digital messages from June 17, 2018, between an unidentified individual and Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'jeeitunes'). The conversation involves banter about someone's appearance resembling a priest from The Exorcist, comments on media optics regarding an interview between Jon Karl and Steve Bannon, and Epstein noting he is traveling to New York. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity