This legal document, part of a court filing, argues for a significant prison sentence (360 to 660 months) for a defendant convicted of sexually exploiting underage girls. It refutes the defendant's arguments for a lighter sentence by citing legal precedents (Stinson, Sash) that prioritize the plain text of sentencing guidelines over conflicting commentary. A footnote dismisses the defendant's comparison of her potential sentence to that of Epstein's as a flawed argument based on different guideline structures.
This document is page 312 of an academic text (likely a book chapter by M. Hoffman et al.) stamped with a House Oversight Bates number. The text discusses evolutionary game theory, arguing against 'Group Selection' as the primary driver of morality and suggesting that logical justifications for morality (like those of Kant or Locke) are merely post-hoc rationalizations for evolutionary instincts. It includes a controversial utilitarian example suggesting that the 'norm against murder' causes 'waste' by keeping alive individuals with no future productivity.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity