This document is a page from a legal filing in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on July 2, 2021. The text is an excerpt from a judicial opinion (likely the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling overturning Bill Cosby's conviction), which is being cited as a precedent. It discusses the principles of 'fundamental fairness' and 'detrimental reliance' regarding non-prosecution agreements/decisions by District Attorneys, arguing that the Montgomery County DA must abide by the former DA's promise not to prosecute Cosby. This was likely submitted by Maxwell's defense to argue that the Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement should similarly protect her.
This document is page 60 of 80 from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, Document 310-1) dated July 2, 2021. The text appears to be an excerpt from a judicial opinion (referenced as [J-100-2020]) discussing the legal principles of prosecutorial discretion and due process. It argues that while prosecutors have vast discretion in charging decisions, they must still act within constitutional boundaries, citing Commonwealth v. Kratsas (Pa. 2001).
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity