Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Justice Holmes

Person
Mentions
4
Relationships
2
Events
2
Documents
2
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
2 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Schenck
Judicial
5
1
View
person Charles Schenck
Judicial
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Schenck v. United States case Supreme Court View
1917-01-01 N/A Schenck v. United States prosecution Philadelphia / US Courts View

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017178.jpg

This document appears to be a page (p. 91) from a legal manuscript or book draft, dated April 2, 2012, likely written by Alan Dershowitz (based on style and document provenance). The text offers a detailed critique of Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes's famous 'shouting fire in a crowded theater' analogy from the *Schenck* case, arguing that it is an inapt and insulting comparison to political advocacy. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of the materials gathered during the congressional oversight investigation, likely regarding the handling of the Epstein case.

Legal manuscript / book draft page
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017177.jpg

This document appears to be a page (page 90) from a draft manuscript dated April 2, 2012. Written in the first person by a self-identified First Amendment lawyer (likely Alan Dershowitz given the House Oversight context), the text critiques the legal analogy of 'shouting fire in a crowded theater' derived from the 1917 case *Schenck v. United States*. The author argues that the analogy was improperly applied to political speech.

Manuscript draft / book excerpt
2025-11-19
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search