UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
OrganizationRelationship Network
002.pdf
This is a Civil Cover Sheet filed on August 14, 2019, in the Southern District of New York for a lawsuit alleging negligence. The plaintiff, identified only as 'VE', is represented by J. Stanley Pottinger and is suing three entities associated with Jeffrey Epstein: Nine East 71st Street Corporation, Financial Trust Company, Inc., and NES, LLC. The document establishes diversity jurisdiction.
2023.10.03%20Response.pdf
In this May 2023 filing to the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands, a pro se incarcerated Ghislaine Maxwell requests a 180-day stay in her civil suit for indemnification against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. Maxwell argues she needs time to find new counsel following her previous attorney's withdrawal, citing severe communication restrictions and lack of access to legal resources (computers, state case law) within FCI Tallahassee. She also argues the civil case should be paused pending the outcome of her criminal appeal (2nd Circuit Case 22-14626-CR) and cites a 2002 lawsuit (Shanks v. Wexner) as evidence that Epstein historically indemnified her for legal costs.
002.pdf
This document is a Civil Cover Sheet filed on November 11, 2019, in the Southern District of New York for a lawsuit brought by Teresa Helm against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The defendants named are Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as executors of Epstein's estate. The nature of the suit is classified as 'Other Personal Injury' under Torts, and the plaintiff demands a jury trial.
018.pdf
A letter from attorney Imran H. Ansari, representing non-party Alan Dershowitz, to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald in the case of Maria Farmer v. the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The letter requests that the Court order the plaintiff to file an amended complaint removing specific allegations regarding Dershowitz (paragraph 39) that the Court had previously ordered stricken as 'redundant, immaterial, impertinent, and/or scandalous' on December 23, 2019.
011.pdf
This document is a legal reply letter dated December 16, 2019, from attorneys representing Alan Dershowitz to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald. Dershowitz seeks to intervene in the civil case *Maria Farmer v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein* to strike specific allegations in the complaint he deems scandalous and irrelevant, and to request sanctions against Farmer and her legal team (Boies Schiller Flexner LLP). The letter argues that the allegations against Dershowitz have no bearing on Farmer's claims of battery and emotional distress against the Epstein Estate and are part of a 'campaign of personal animus'.
009.pdf
This document is a letter from Alan Dershowitz's legal counsel to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald requesting a pre-motion conference to intervene in the civil case 'Maria Farmer v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein'. Dershowitz seeks to strike paragraph 39 of Farmer's complaint, which alleges she saw him at Epstein's New York mansion going upstairs with young girls brought by Ghislaine Maxwell. Dershowitz argues this allegation is demonstrably false based on chronology (claiming he didn't meet Epstein until after Farmer left) and is legally irrelevant to the estate case, serving only to defame him.
002.pdf
This document is a Civil Cover Sheet filed on November 12, 2019, in the Southern District of New York for a lawsuit initiated by Maria Farmer against Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Edward Epstein. The nature of the suit is categorized as 'Other Personal Injury' under diversity jurisdiction, as the plaintiff resides in Arkansas and the defendants are deemed citizens of the U.S. Virgin Islands (Epstein's domicile). The plaintiff demands a jury trial.
002.pdf
This document is a Civil Cover Sheet (Form JS 44) filed on December 27, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. The plaintiff, using the pseudonym Anastasia Doe, is suing Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. The nature of the suit is listed as 'Other Personal Injury' and jurisdiction is based on diversity.
005.pdf
This document is a Civil Cover Sheet (Form JS 44) filed on October 18, 2019, in the Southern District of New York for a lawsuit initiated by 'Jane Doe 17' against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and various associated corporate entities. The cause of action is listed as Battery under 18 U.S.C. sections 1591-1595 (statutes relating to sex trafficking and forced labor). The document identifies Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn as the personal representatives of the estate and lists several shell companies (like JEGE, Inc. and NES, LLC) as defendants whose addresses were unknown at the time of filing.
031.pdf
This document is a letter from attorney Bennet Moskowitz to Judge Lewis J. Liman dated February 14, 2020, in the case of Jane Doe 1000 v. the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The letter requests approval for a briefing schedule regarding an anticipated motion to dismiss, with deadlines set for February, March, and April 2020. The document was endorsed and ordered by Judge Liman on February 18, 2020.
002.pdf
Civil Cover Sheet (Form JS 44) filed on November 14, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. Plaintiff Juliette Bryant, a resident of South Africa, is suing Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The nature of the suit is classified as 'Other Personal Injury' tort, with jurisdiction based on diversity (foreign citizen vs citizens of another state/USVI).
EFTA00027134.pdf
This document is a criminal Information filed on August 28, 2013, charging James McKinnon, a Correctional Officer at Big Spring Correctional Center (BSCC), with Misprision of a Felony. McKinnon is accused of concealing the fact that correctional officers in the 'Flight Line Unit' falsified logs regarding mandatory 30-minute rounds on August 22-23, 2012. Despite the mention of 'Flight Line,' this refers to a housing unit within the prison (located on a former airbase), not actual aircraft operations.
EFTA00027122.pdf
This document is an opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirming the sentence of Frederick Hernandez, a former correctional officer. Hernandez pled guilty to making false statements by falsifying logs regarding inmate safety checks during a shift in which inmate Luis Bent committed suicide. The court upheld a sentencing enhancement, ruling that Hernandez's failure to perform mandatory checks while knowing the inmate was suicidal constituted a conscious or reckless risk of death. This case serves as a legal precedent regarding prison guard liability and falsification of records in the context of inmate suicide.
EFTA00020897.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 2020 involving the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and the United States District Court. It concerns the circulation of signed warrant materials and affidavits related to an 'EPSTEIN' matter (likely related to the estate or ongoing investigation given the date). The chain includes file attachments referencing case number '20 MAG 11668'.
EFTA00009632.pdf
This document is a transcript of Grand Jury testimony from February 6, 2007, detailing the FBI's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, which began after a referral from the Palm Beach Police Department. The testimony focuses on Epstein's residences, his ownership of multiple aircraft, payments to underage females for sexual massages, and the FBI's efforts to establish an interstate nexus by examining flight manifests and the cell phone records of Epstein's assistant, who contacted underage victims.
EFTA00008599.pdf
This document is a 2019 SDNY presentation containing evidence against Jeffrey Epstein from the 2004-2005 period. It includes photos of his NY and Palm Beach properties, handwritten message slips explicitly referencing 'females' and scheduling encounters, financial records of cash deposits, call logs connecting NY and Florida, and flight records for N908JE. Notable evidence includes a message slip recording a call from Donald Trump and flight manifests placing Epstein on specific trips between New York and Palm Beach.
DOJ-OGR-00001347.jpg
This document is a letter dated December 4, 2020, from the Federal Bureau of Prisons (MDC Brooklyn) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the confinement conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter addresses the judge's concerns about Maxwell's safety, detailing her housing assignment, daily access to common areas and legal materials, and her ability to use the commissary. It notes that staff use flashlights for overnight checks and that Maxwell has been instructed on how to use the Administrative Remedy Program for complaints.
DOJ-OGR-00000844.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from July 2020 detailing the unsealing of the indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell, her arrest in New Hampshire, and the subsequent assignment of the case to Judge Alison J. Nathan. It records the addition of prosecution attorneys (Rossmiller, Comey, Moe), a motion for detention, and procedural orders regarding scheduling an initial appearance and bail hearing via remote video due to COVID-19 protocols at the Metropolitan Detention Center.
DOJ-OGR-00020942.jpg
This document is a page from a court filing (Exhibit A-316) related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It displays a blank lined page assigned to 'Juror ID: 50', likely part of a verdict form, note-taking page, or questionnaire. The page contains no handwriting other than the Juror ID number.
DOJ-OGR-00016048.jpg
A photograph entered as Government Exhibit 745 in the trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case S2 20 Cr. 330). The image depicts the exterior of a brown log cabin with a wooden wheelchair ramp/walkway, surrounded by trees with autumn leaves. The document includes a DOJ bates stamp in the footer.
DOJ-OGR-00002281(1).jpg
This document is a Table of Authorities page (Page 3 of 19) from a court filing dated January 25, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It lists twenty-one legal precedents (cases) cited in the brief, primarily from the Second Circuit and D.C. Circuit, covering dates from 1964 to 2011. The document bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00002281.
DOJ-OGR-00019463.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet (Case 20-3061) detailing the initial legal proceedings against Ghislaine Maxwell from June 29, 2020, to July 6, 2020. It records the unsealing of the indictment, her arrest in New Hampshire, the assignment of the case to Judge Alison J. Nathan, and the filing of a motion to detain. The document also includes a detailed order from Judge Nathan discussing the scheduling of an arraignment and bail hearing, citing COVID-19 protocols and the logistical constraints of video appearances from the Metropolitan Detention Center.
DOJ-OGR-00019776.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from July 2020 chronicling the unsealing of the indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell, her arrest in New Hampshire, and the assignment of Judge Alison J. Nathan to the case. It details the procedural motions to detain the defendant and the scheduling of her initial arraignment via remote video conference due to COVID-19 protocols at the Metropolitan Detention Center. Correspondence between prosecution attorneys (Rossmiller, Comey, Moe) and defense counsel (Cohen) regarding scheduling is also logged.
DOJ-OGR-00010503.jpg
This document is a separator page designated as 'Exhibit F'. It is part of a larger court filing (Document 663) for Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on June 15, 2022. It bears a Department of Justice production stamp number DOJ-OGR-00010503.
DOJ-OGR-00004826.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a legal filing in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), specifically citing the Pennsylvania Supreme Court opinion ([J-100-2020]) regarding Bill Cosby. It details the history of D.A. Bruce Castor's verbal non-prosecution decision in 2005, noting that because Cosby believed he had immunity, he did not invoke his Fifth Amendment rights during civil depositions. This legal precedent regarding non-prosecution agreements (NPAs) was likely used by the defense or prosecution in the Maxwell/Epstein case to argue the validity or scope of Epstein's own non-prosecution agreement.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity