| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Social meeting |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
[REDACTED]
|
Social professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
e:jeeitunes@gmail.com
|
Professional social |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
jeeitunes@gmail.com
|
Meeting schedule |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
jeeitunes@gmail.com (Epstein)
|
Social professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
[REDACTED]
|
Professional social |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Meeting or interaction with Chomsky | Unknown | View |
| 2019-05-01 | N/A | Proposed meeting with Chomsky | Unknown (possibly near 'ran... | View |
| 2018-09-07 | N/A | Invitation to Arizona extended by Noam Chomsky. | Arizona | View |
| 2015-12-02 | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein meeting/presence with Chomsky | Unknown (possibly Cambridge) | View |
| 0019-05-27 | N/A | Lunch at the Chomsky's residence | the Chomsky's | View |
This document appears to be a page (155) from a book or academic text regarding Artificial Intelligence, specifically comparing bottom-up systems (like AlphaZero) with Top-down Bayesian Models. It discusses the challenges of computer vision compared to human learning and cites research by Brenden Lake (NYU), Ruslan Salakhutdinov, and Joshua B. Tenenbaum published in 2015. The page bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was produced as part of a congressional investigation, likely related to scientific funding or research connections (common in the context of Epstein's ties to academia/MIT), though Epstein is not mentioned on this specific page.
This document is a digital communication log from the House Oversight Committee archives, dated June 23-24, 2019. It captures an exchange involving the email address 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual, discussing the Facebook Libra cryptocurrency, which Epstein describes as 'Super dangerous.' Additionally, an earlier message mentions a schedule involving 'prep' occurring 'right after Chomsky,' likely referring to Noam Chomsky.
This document is a House Oversight Committee log of electronic messages exchanged on June 18-19, 2019. The exchange is between a redacted sender and 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (a known Epstein alias). Key content includes a reference to 'Chomsky' asking about a film, a cryptic message about 'the closet of the Vatican,' and shared links to political articles regarding US-Middle East relations and Bill Barr.
This document is a log of digital messages from June 17, 2019, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the email 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com') and a redacted individual. The conversation revolves around a list of prominent intellectuals and scientists, including Melanie Walker, Seth Lloyd, Lawrence Krauss, Noam Chomsky, and Martin Novak, seemingly in the context of the 'Edge' foundation. The exchange specifically praises literary agent John Brockman as a 'genius,' with Epstein remarking that 'most' people like him are 'dead.'
This document is a forensic extract of text messages from May 2019 between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com') and a redacted individual. The conversation discusses a lunch meeting at 'the Chomsky's' (likely Noam Chomsky) and involves political commentary regarding 'reactionaries' and strategies on 'how to leverage' a situation. The document is marked with a House Oversight footer, indicating it is part of a congressional investigation.
This document contains a log of five digital messages from May 4, 2019. The exchange is between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias jeeitunes) and a redacted individual. They discuss travel plans to Epstein's 'ranch' and 'island,' scheduling a meeting with 'Chomsky' (likely Noam Chomsky), and express frustration regarding 'Bolosnaro' (Jair Bolsonaro) 'bailing' on an engagement due to influence from 'the generals.'
This document contains a log of digital messages exchanged between March 21 and March 22, 2019. The conversation is between a redacted individual and 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an alias associated with Jeffrey Epstein). They discuss an unidentified male described as a 'legend' and 'super smart,' contrasting him with Noam Chomsky, while also mentioning scheduling and 'the emblem of the movement.'
This document is a digital communication log from December 6, 2018, marked as House Oversight evidence. It details a conversation between 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (likely Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The discussion involves confirmation that 'Chomsky' is 'all in,' followed by an inquiry regarding 'Maxwell' (Ghislaine), with the redacted sender noting she has a 'jealous' boyfriend, to which the jeeitunes account responds dismissively ('So what').
This document is a digital forensic log from the House Oversight Committee containing a text message exchange dated September 7, 2018. It details a conversation between a redacted individual and 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an alias associated with Jeffrey Epstein). Key information includes a statement that Noam Chomsky invited the recipient to Arizona, followed by a rapid series of messages from 'jeeitunes' discussing breaking news items from the New York Times, specifically speculating about Matteo Salvini and Jack Ma's retirement.
This document is an email dated June 30, 2019, sent from 'J' (using the email jeevacation@gmail.com) to Jeffrey Epstein at the same address, effectively a note-to-self. The subject line is 'list for bannon steve,' suggesting the content was intended for Steve Bannon. The body consists of a disorganized list of high-profile surnames and full names, including politicians (Clinton, Schumer, Richardson), scientists (Minsky, Krauss, Chomsky), and business figures (Gates, Thiel, Rockefeller), sent just days before Epstein's arrest.
An email thread from December 2, 2015, involving Jeffrey Epstein, Lesley Groff, and Lisa New. Lisa New requests a meeting with Epstein to discuss funding and advice for her 'Poetry in America' initiative, mentioning that 'Larry' is away. Notably, Epstein informs Groff that 'Chomsky' (presumably Noam Chomsky) is currently with him.
This text discusses advancements and challenges in artificial intelligence, contrasting bottom-up systems like AlphaZero with top-down Bayesian models. It highlights the difficulty computers face with tasks trivial to humans, such as image recognition, and explores how Bayesian models address hypothesis testing and concept generation. The text also references research by Brenden Lake and colleagues on using top-down methods for character recognition.
This document, an email identified as being from Jeffrey Epstein via the 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026414' document number, contains speculative and controversial theories on race, gender, and intelligence. The author discusses altering brain development to 'make blacks smarter', stereotypes various ethnic and gender groups based on perceived cognitive and motivational differences, and critiques linguist Noam Chomsky's theories on language.
This document, marked as a House Oversight exhibit, is a written text from an unnamed author to an unnamed recipient. The author lays out a series of racist, sexist, and pseudo-scientific theories about differences in intelligence and cognition among races (Black, European, Chinese, Jewish) and genders. The text disputes established science, dismisses social factors for developmental differences, and challenges linguist Noam Chomsky's theories on language acquisition.
This document, labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026400', appears to be an email or message containing pseudoscientific and offensive speculation on cognitive and behavioral differences based on race and gender. The unidentified author discusses topics ranging from developmental psychology and IQ to linguistics (critiquing Chomsky) and the cultural meaning of music, expressing numerous stereotypes. The 're taboo' line suggests it is a reply to a conversation on a controversial topic.
This document, marked as an exhibit from the House Oversight Committee, contains a series of personal musings on controversial topics. The author speculates on pseudoscientific theories about race, genetics, and culture (commenting on Chinese and Jewish people), critiques Chomsky's linguistic theories, and entertains 'taboo' ideas about using climate change and eugenics for population control, and the nature of fascism. The author's identity is not stated, but the content is characteristic of writings associated with Jeffrey Epstein.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity