Investigating Chamber
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
requested person
|
Procedural |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal procedure | The document describes the legal procedure for extradition, including appearing before the Public... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00002146.jpg
This document is a page from a legal opinion filed on December 14, 2020, by French attorney William Julié in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The text argues that French Constitutional law and the 1996 Extradition Treaty with the US do not strictly prohibit the extradition of French nationals, asserting that it is ultimately an executive decision. The author concludes that if Maxwell were to flee to France, the French Investigating Chamber would not be legally bound to block her extradition to the United States.
DOJ-OGR-00002141.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing by attorney William Julié regarding the potential extradition of Ghislaine Maxwell from France to the USA. The filing argues that under the US-France Extradition Treaty, a claim of political motivation is unlikely to succeed in preventing her extradition, citing a history of French courts granting US requests and distinguishing her case from a past instance where extradition to Russia was denied on political grounds.
DOJ-OGR-00002128.jpg
This document, part of a legal case filed on December 14, 2020, is a legal opinion from attorney William Julié regarding extradition procedures. It outlines the roles of the Public Prosecutor and the Investigating Chamber, and explains that while there is no specific timeframe for a final government decree, the process can be expedited to a few weeks if the request is deemed urgent.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity