This document appears to be a page (259) from a manuscript draft dated April 2, 2012. It discusses legal ethics and the 'no free lunch' doctrine regarding the defense of sexual crime suspects. The text analyzes a specific instance where a 'feminist lawyer' successfully argued an appeal for a defendant, prioritizing her duty to the client over the broader cause of women's rights, despite acknowledging the victory was a 'step back for women' regarding the privacy of victim counseling records.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity