This document contains two pages from a spiral-bound photo album or scrapbook (Bates stamp EFTA00001942). The left page shows a night scene of a group sitting in camp chairs drinking wine. The right page shows a woman (face redacted) sitting on a wooden deck wrapped in a blanket with tea and scones. The handwritten text describes a positive experience staying at a camp in 'the bush,' suggesting a safari trip.
A page from a photo album containing a photograph of a person (face redacted) sitting in a tent-like structure with a lantern. The handwritten caption describes an evening in 'the bush' where a guard escorted the author from their tent to a communal fireplace for dinner, noting the darkness and the author's feeling of bravery.
This document is page 116 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The witness, identified as Loftus (likely Elizabeth Loftus), is testifying during direct examination about the ethical limitations of human experimentation and the role of human subjects review committees. She discusses her work on 'false memories,' describing how she obtains approval to plant false traumatic memories in research participants, such as being attacked by an animal, while noting that more disturbing scenarios (e.g., forced animal sacrifice by a parent) might be rejected by ethics committees.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Loftus. Loftus discusses the ethical review process for psychological experiments on humans, explaining how the requirement to 'cause no harm' limits the scope of research, particularly in studies on false memories. Loftus provides examples of both approvable and potentially unapprovable experiments that a 'human subjects review committee' might consider.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity