This legal document argues in favor of allowing 'Juror 50' to intervene in a case to protect his privacy rights concerning a past sexual assault. It cites legal precedents, including the Supreme Court case *Press-Enter. Co.* and the Second Circuit case *United States v. King*, to establish that jurors have compelling privacy interests that justify sealing records on sensitive personal matters. The filing asserts that intervention will also allow Juror 50 to assert his fifth amendment rights before any inquiry is held.
This document is page 3 of 13 from a legal filing (Document 609) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on February 24, 2022. It is a Table of Authorities listing various legal precedents (case law). The cases cited largely pertain to press access, public trials, and the sealing of judicial documents (e.g., Associated Press, Press-Enterprise Co.), suggesting the filing relates to transparency issues or the unsealing of evidence in the Maxwell trial.
This document is page 2 of 3 of a Civil Cover Sheet for a lawsuit filed in the United States District Court, Central District of California (Case 5:16-cv-00907). The form determines the venue assignment, indicating that because 50% or more of the plaintiffs reside in Riverside or San Bernardino County, the case is assigned to the Eastern Division. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029258), suggesting it was part of a congressional investigation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity