HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P.A.
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Lanna Leigh Belohlavek
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-01-18 | Mailing | A letter was mailed from North Miami Beach, FL. | North Miami Beach, FL | View |
009.pdf
This document is a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice filed on February 22, 2008, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case No. 08-80069). The plaintiffs (Jane Doe No. 1 and her parents) voluntarily dismissed their action against Jeffrey Epstein. The document includes a certificate of service indicating that notice was sent electronically to attorney Theodore Jon Leopold and by mail to Jeffrey Epstein at his New York residence.
008.pdf
This document is a Notice of Non-Opposition filed on February 14, 2008, in the case of Jane Doe No. 1 et al. v. Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida. The plaintiffs (Jane Doe No. 1, her father, and stepmother) inform the court that they do not oppose the motion to intervene filed by Jane Doe's mother. The document lists the attorneys representing the plaintiffs from the firm Herman & Mermelstein, P.A.
007.pdf
This document is a legal memorandum filed on February 13, 2008, by the attorneys for Jane Doe No. 1 and her father in the case against Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 08-80069). The plaintiffs oppose a motion filed by Jane Doe's mother, Dawn LaVogue Sandberg, who sought to stay the proceedings until the minor plaintiff reached the age of majority. The plaintiffs argue that the mother's motion is procedurally defective, was not properly served on the defendant (Epstein), and that the mother lacks standing because the father has full legal custody of the child. The document emphasizes that the lawsuit concerns the sexual assault of Jane Doe No. 1 by Epstein when she was 14 years old.
EFTA00023624.pdf
This document is a Plaintiff's Notice of Serving Second Amended Answers to Interrogatories in a 2009 civil case against Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida. The plaintiff, whose name is redacted, details her residence history and her interactions with Epstein between 2002 and 2003, stating she visited his Florida home roughly twice a week to provide massages after being introduced by a friend. The document reveals she recruited other females for Epstein in exchange for payment, used drugs (Morning Glory, Angel Trumpets, cocaine, marijuana) during the relevant period, and lists various legal counsel and law enforcement entities involved in the investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00030281.tif
This document is a legal letter dated August 27, 2009, from Robert D. Critton, Jr. of Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP to Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. of Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. It concerns the case Jane Doe No. 4 v. Epstein, informing Mermelstein that Mr. Epstein intends to be present at his client's deposition as a party-defendant, but will not engage in conversation with Mermelstein's client.
DOJ-OGR-00030394.jpg
This document is a scanned image of an envelope sent by the law firm Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. to Lanna Leigh Belohlavek, Esq. at the State Attorney's Office in West Palm Beach, Florida. The postage meter indicates the item was mailed on March 31, 2008, with a cost of $0.41. The document includes footer information indicating it is part of a 2017 Public Records Request (No. 17-295) and bears the Bates number DOJ-OGR-00030394.
DOJ-OGR-00030392.jpg
This legal document, dated March 31, 2008, is a motion for a protective order filed by the law firm Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. on behalf of 'Witness Y. Doe'. The motion requests that the court order the witness's deposition for an unspecified criminal case and the civil case 'Jane Doe No. 3 v. Jeffrey Epstein' to be conducted simultaneously. The stated purpose is to prevent potential harassment of the witness by the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00030388.jpg
This document is an envelope from the law firm Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. in Miami, Florida, addressed to Lanna Leigh Belohlavek at the State Attorney's Office in West Palm Beach. The envelope is postmarked April 2, 2008, from North Miami Beach, FL, with postage of $0.41. The document also contains footer information indicating it is page 35 of 114 from a public records request dated 07/26/17.
DOJ-OGR-00030386.jpg
This is a legal notice filed on April 2, 2008, in the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County, Florida (Case No. 502006CF009454AXXXMB). Attorneys for 'Witness Y. Doe' (Herman & Mermelstein, P.A.) are withdrawing a Motion for Protective Order because Jeffrey Epstein's counsel agreed to cancel the deposition of Y. Doe. The document includes contact information for the attorneys and bears a 2017 public records request footer.
DOJ-OGR-00030440.jpg
This document is an envelope from the law firm Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. in Miami, FL, addressed to Lanna Leigh Belohlavek at the State Attorney's Office in West Palm Beach, FL. The envelope was postmarked on January 18, 2008, and stamped as received on January 22, 2008, indicating a legal or professional communication between the two parties.
DOJ-OGR-00030438.jpg
This document is the final page of a legal filing, dated January 24, 2008, from the law firm Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. On behalf of the plaintiff, Jane Doe's Father, the filing demands judgment for loss of consortium and other damages, and formally requests a jury trial. The document is signed by attorney Jeffrey M. Herman and lists other attorneys from the firm.
DOJ-OGR-00030435.jpg
This page from a legal filing details the systematic recruitment of economically disadvantaged underage girls from Loxahatchee, FL, by Ms. Robson for Jeffrey Epstein. It describes the procedure upon arrival at Epstein's Palm Beach mansion, where victims were processed by assistant Sarah Kellen and led to a massage room before being subjected to sexual acts by Epstein. The document highlights that victims were targeted specifically because they were perceived as unlikely to complain to authorities.
DOJ-OGR-00030434.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal complaint filed against Jeffrey Epstein, establishing jurisdiction, venue, and outlining factual allegations regarding his wealth, residences, and alleged sexual abuse of minors. It specifically details a scheme to exploit economically disadvantaged girls, introduces a plaintiff identified as Jane Doe who was victimized at age 14 in 2005, and names Haley Robson as an integral player in the scheme.
DOJ-OGR-00030433.jpg
This is the first page of a civil complaint filed on January 24, 2008, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case No. 08-80069). The plaintiffs are a minor identified as Jane Doe No. 1, along with her father and stepmother, filing against Jeffrey Epstein. The complaint alleges sexual assault and abuse, noting that fictitious names are used to protect the minor's identity.
DOJ-OGR-00030431.jpg
This document is a Subpoena for Deposition issued by the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida, for Case No. 2006CF009454AXX (State of Florida vs. Jeffrey Epstein). Signed by attorney Jack A. Goldberger on January 29, 2008, it commands a redacted individual to appear for a deposition at the Palm Beach County Courthouse on February 6, 2008. The document includes fax headers from May 2008 and is stamped as part of a 2017 Public Records Request.
DOJ-OGR-00031565.jpg
This legal document, dated March 31, 2008, is a request for a protective order filed by the law firm Herman & Mermelstein on behalf of 'Witness Y. Doe'. The motion asks the court to require that depositions for a criminal case and a civil case, 'Jane Doe No. 3 v. Jeffrey Epstein', be conducted at the same time to prevent harassment of the witness by Defendant Epstein. The filing states that counsel for the State and for Epstein were contacted about this request but have not responded.
DOJ-OGR-00030996.jpg
This legal document, dated April 2, 2008, is a court filing in the case of the State of Florida versus Jeffrey Epstein. Attorneys for a witness, identified as 'Y. Doe', are formally withdrawing a Motion for a Protective Order. The withdrawal is based on the representation that the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, has agreed to cancel the deposition of Y. Doe.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity