Daniel Mullkoff
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Teala Davies
|
Client |
3
|
3 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-30 | N/A | Filing of Notice of Appearance | Court (Docket 21-770) | View |
| 2020-04-08 | N/A | Letter filed by Plaintiff's counsel regarding Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-03-27 | N/A | Declaration signed by Daniel Mullkoff | New York, New York | View |
039-01.pdf
This document is a legal Opinion & Order from the Southern District of New York in the case of Mary Doe v. the Executors of Jeffrey Epstein's Estate. The court granted the executors' motion to dismiss the plaintiff's request for punitive damages. The judge ruled that New York law applies to the case because the torts occurred in New York, and under New York's Estates, Powers and Trusts Law (EPTL ยง 11-3.2(a)(1)), punitive damages cannot be awarded against the personal representatives of an estate.
035.pdf
Legal correspondence from Plaintiff's attorney Daniel Mullkoff to Judge Debra Freeman regarding the case Davies v. Indyke et al. The letter argues that the Defendants improperly raised a new argument concerning the New Mexico statute of limitations for the first time in a reply brief and contends that the Plaintiff's claims regarding sexual abuse by Jeffrey Epstein in New Mexico are timely under the discovery rule.
033.pdf
This document is a legal declaration by attorney Daniel Mullkoff submitted in the case of Teala Davies v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (Executors of the Epstein Estate). The declaration serves to introduce three exhibits into the court record: Epstein's Last Will and Testament (dated Aug 8, 2019), a complaint filed by the US Virgin Islands, and an Affidavit of Service from the case Araoz v. Epstein. The declaration opposes the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss.
008.pdf
This is a Notice of Appearance filed on November 22, 2019, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case No. 19 Civ. 10788). Attorney Daniel Mullkoff of Cuti Hecker Wang LLP formally enters his appearance as counsel for the Plaintiff, Teala Davies, in her lawsuit against Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate.
EFTA00027912.pdf
This document is an email chain from November and December 2019 between the administrators of the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (Jordy Feldman) and legal counsel for the victims (Roberta Kaplan's firm). The correspondence centers on the victims' counsel challenging the independence of the program, arguing that because the administrators were hired and paid by the Epstein Estate, they cannot be neutral. Kaplan's team proposes adding a fourth administrator selected by the plaintiffs to ensure fairness.
EFTA00019565.pdf
This document is an email chain from November and December 2019 between Jordy Feldman (Administrator of the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program) and attorneys Roberta Kaplan and Kate Doniger (representing victims). The core conflict involves the independence of the Compensation Program; Kaplan's team argues that because the administrators were hired by the Estate, they lack independence, and proposes adding a fourth, plaintiff-selected administrator. Feldman rejects this proposal, citing the reputation and experience of his team (including Ken Feinberg and Camille Biros) and asserting the program's neutrality.
Davies v. Indyke et al., 19-cv-10788 (GHW)(DCF)
Requesting the Court disregard a new legal argument regarding New Mexico statute of limitations raised by Defendants for the first time in their reply brief.
Notice of Appearance
Notification that Daniel Mullkoff is appearing as counsel for the Plaintiff and providing contact details for service.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity