This document is page 7 of Stephen Gillers' Curriculum Vitae, filed as Exhibit A-5859 in a legal case. It details his prior employment from 1968 to 1978, including roles at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison and as a judicial clerk. It also lists selected testimonies he provided to legislative bodies regarding judicial nominations and legal reform acts between 1981 and 1988.
This document, filed on April 6, 2012, is a partial list of selected testimonies and public lectures by Stephen Gillers. It details his involvement in legal and ethical discourse, including testimony before the Senate Committee on the Judiciary regarding judicial and civil rights nominations, and numerous lectures at various university law schools on topics such as legal ethics, lawyer responsibility, confidentiality, and the legal profession's role in society.
This document is a professional biography or curriculum vitae for Stephen Gillers, detailing his employment history from 1968 to 1978. It lists his roles at various law firms and organizations, including his time as a judicial clerk, associate, and executive director. The document also provides a list of selected testimonies he delivered before various congressional and professional committees between 1981 and 1988 on topics such as judicial nominations and legal reform.
This document is a forensic log of digital messages exchanged on May 8, 2019, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias email 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com') and a redacted individual. The conversation centers on political news regarding the Trump family, specifically sharing a CBS article about NY Senate bills on Trump's tax returns and discussing Donald Trump Jr. appearing before a Senate committee. The tone suggests a shared interest in potential legal or political troubles for the Trump administration, described as 'Drip drip drip' and 'Low hanging fruit'.
This document is page 65 of a 2014 law review article detailing the history of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It explains that in April 2004, advocates shifted focus from a constitutional amendment to federal legislation due to the difficulty of obtaining a supermajority. The text discusses the limitations of the 1990 Victims' Rights and Restitution Act and cites various legal scholars and Senators (Kyl, Leahy, Feinstein) regarding the legislative history. This document appears in the House Oversight collection likely as background material regarding the legal framework relevant to the Epstein case's non-prosecution agreement.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity