Ralph Nader
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Subject of discussion |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Elliott Broidy
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Nader-Broidy scheme | Washington D.C. | View |
| 2019-01-01 | Legal event | An indictment was issued for conduct that occurred in 2000 in the case of United State v. Nader. | E.D. Va. | View |
EFTA00031422.pdf
This document is an email chain from February to April 2021 between an Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) for the Southern District of New York and an unidentified attorney who successfully litigated *United States v. Nader*. The AUSA reached out to discuss a 'retroactivity issue' relevant to a current case. The final email, dated April 17, 2021, thanks the attorney for their help and attaches 'Maxwell_Opinion.pdf,' indicating the AUSA secured a favorable ruling in the Ghislaine Maxwell case based on the consultation.
DOJ-OGR-00020818.jpg
This legal document, part of Case 22-1426, discusses the court's reasoning for why the sex trafficking charges against Maxwell are not time-barred. The court argues that U.S. Code ยง 3299 applies retroactively to offenses where the statute of limitations had not yet expired, citing several other district court decisions. The document also addresses Maxwell's motion to dismiss certain counts as multiplicitous, concluding that such a motion is premature at the pretrial stage.
DOJ-OGR-00002995.jpg
This legal document, a page from a court filing, presents an argument regarding the Ex Post Facto Clause and statutes of limitations. The author argues that it is constitutionally permissible for Congress to retroactively extend a limitations period for prosecutions that are not yet time-barred, citing numerous legal precedents like Falter v. United States and Stogner v. California. The document concludes that applying Section 3283 retroactively in this case is lawful and dismisses the defendant's contrary assertion.
DOJ-OGR-00002991.jpg
This legal document is a page from a court filing that refutes a defendant's argument about the legislative intent of Section 3283. The author argues the defendant used a misleading, selective quote from Senator Patrick Leahy to claim Congress did not intend for an extended statute of limitations to apply retroactively. The document provides the full quotation to show that Congress removed the retroactivity provision due to constitutional concerns, not to limit the statute's application as the defendant suggests.
DOJ-OGR-00002944.jpg
This document is page 10 (labeled 'ix') of a Table of Authorities from a legal filing dated April 16, 2021, in the case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It lists legal precedents beginning with 'S' through 'U', including citations for *United States v. Nader* (marked 'passim', meaning cited frequently) and various Second Circuit decisions. The footer indicates this document was processed by the DOJ Office of Government Relations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026511.jpg
This document is an email from Larry Summers (sent from his iPad) to Jeffrey Epstein (indicated by the 'JEE' and 'jeevacation@gmail.com' disclaimer). Summers discusses political centrism and voting scenarios involving Gore, Nader, and the Tea Party, and explicitly notes, 'Btw I gave them 10,000.' The document bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026511.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026510.jpg
An email exchange between Larry Summers and Eric Maskin dated September 11, 2018. They discuss a meeting held earlier that day regarding a project involving Adam Friedman. The conversation focuses on political theory, specifically the merits of Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) versus plurality rule, and its potential impact on political polarization and election outcomes (citing Nader/Bush scenarios). The document appears to be part of a House Oversight production.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027450.jpg
A transcript of digital communications from October 9, 2018, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual. The conversation discusses high-profile geopolitical figures and scandals, specifically mentioning Zamel, Nader, Erik Prince (Prinz), Oleg Deripaska, 1MDB, MBS (Mohammed bin Salman), and various countries involved in global conflicts or corruption. The tone suggests a discussion about widespread culpability ('Fingerprints everywhere') and chaotic geopolitical situations ('So deeply fucked up').
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029508.jpg
This document appears to be the final paragraph of a Foreign Policy (FP) article included in House Oversight Committee records (Bates stamp 029508). The text discusses lobbying in Washington D.C., specifically referencing a 'Nader-Broidy scheme' to sell American foreign policy and alluding to the Robert Mueller investigation regarding associates in Donald Trump's orbit. The page concludes with a subscription advertisement for Foreign Policy magazine.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026323.jpg
This document is an email from Larry Summers to Eric Maskin dated September 11, 2018. Summers discusses the political implications of a proposal from a meeting that morning, weighing its potential effects on election outcomes with historical references to Nader, Bush, and Gore. He concludes by stating, 'Btw I gave them 10,000,' indicating a financial contribution to the group behind the proposal.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity