9 East 71st Street, New York, New York
LocationRelationship Network
001-02.pdf
This document is the 2019 Sealed Indictment (19 Cr. 490) against Jeffrey Epstein filed in the SDNY, charging him with Sex Trafficking Conspiracy and Sex Trafficking. It details allegations that between 2002 and 2005, Epstein created a network of underage victims in New York and Florida, paying them for sexual acts disguised as massages and incentivizing them to recruit other minors. The indictment lists specific overt acts involving three minor victims and three employees who facilitated the abuse by scheduling appointments, and it seeks forfeiture of Epstein's property at 9 East 71st Street, owned by Maple, Inc.
020.pdf
This document is a Reply in Support of a Motion to Quash Service of Process filed by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team in November 2010. The defense argues that the plaintiff failed to properly serve Epstein because the papers were left with an individual named 'Mark' at Epstein's New York home (9 East 71st St), but the plaintiff failed to prove 'Mark' resided there or was of suitable discretion. The filing also seeks to strike allegations regarding obstruction of justice in prior litigation and opposes sanctions against Epstein.
020-01.pdf
This document is a Supplemental Affidavit filed on November 22, 2010, in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case 9:10-cv-81111-WPD). Richard Barnett, the property manager of 9 East 71st Street in New York, testifies that he does not reside at the property, that no one resided there on October 8, 2010, and specifically that Jeffrey Epstein was not present at that location on that date.
014.pdf
A legal motion filed on November 10, 2010, by Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys requesting the court to quash service of process in the case of M.J. v. Epstein. The defense argues that leaving an unmarked envelope in the mailbox of Epstein's New York vacation home and claiming to leave papers with a non-existent person named 'Mark' violates Federal, New York, and Florida service laws. The document includes arguments citing specific statutes and an affidavit from Richard Barnett denying the presence of anyone named 'Mark' at the residence.
012-01.pdf
This document is a legal affidavit filed on November 3, 2010, in the case of M.J. v. Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. The affiant, Richard Barnett, states that he was present at Epstein's residence at 9 East 71st Street, NYC, for the entire day of October 8, 2010. He testifies that no individual named 'Mark' worked, resided, was present, or received a subpoena at that location on that date.
007.pdf
This document is a Motion to Quash Service of Process filed by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team on October 29, 2010, in the Southern District of Florida. Epstein's lawyers argue that the plaintiff, 'M.J.', failed to properly serve Epstein with the lawsuit because the documents were merely left in an unmarked envelope in the mailbox of his New York residence (9 East 71st Street) rather than being delivered personally as required by law. The document details the specific dates of the attempted service and cites Florida, New York, and Federal laws to support the argument that the service was legally ineffective.
022-01.pdf
This document is an indictment (19 Cr. 490) filed in the SDNY charging Jeffrey Epstein with sex trafficking conspiracy and sex trafficking of minors between 2002 and 2005. It details how Epstein used a network of employees and victim-recruiters to source minors for sexual abuse at his residences in New York and Palm Beach, paying them in cash. The document also includes forfeiture allegations for his property at 9 East 71st Street, New York, owned by Maple, Inc.
EFTA00037984.pdf
This document is an FBI Operations Order Form dated July 2, 2019, outlining the plan to arrest Jeffrey Epstein for child sex trafficking. It details that Epstein was out of the country at the time, and a 'silent hit' was placed with CBP to detain him upon his return to the US, after which FBI and NYPD would effect the arrest. The plan also includes the subsequent execution of a search warrant at his residence at 9 East 71st Street in New York.
EFTA00021303.pdf
This document is a Search and Seizure Warrant issued on July 7, 2019, by U.S. Magistrate Judge Barbara Moses for the premises located at 9 East 71st Street, New York, NY (Jeffrey Epstein's residence). The warrant authorizes law enforcement to search for evidence related to violations of sex trafficking of minors (18 U.S.C. 1591) and conspiracy (18 U.S.C. 371). Specific items to be seized include taxidermied dogs, massage tables, female torso busts, sex toys, nude photos, and a binder labeled 'PB Girls'.
EFTA00020929.pdf
This document is a title search report for Jeffrey Epstein's property at 9 East 71st Street, New York, NY, certified by Jade Data Research, Inc. It details the chain of ownership, showing a transfer in 1989 to Nine East 71st Street Corporation and a subsequent transfer in 2011/2012 to Maple, Inc. signed by Jeffrey Epstein as President for 'No Consideration.' Significantly, the report notes a Lis Pendens (legal action pending) filed on July 11, 2019, under Index # 19CR490, which corresponds to the federal criminal indictment against Epstein.
EFTA00018425.pdf
This document is a Search and Seizure Warrant issued on July 11, 2019, by U.S. Magistrate Judge Henry Pitman for the Southern District of New York. It authorizes law enforcement to search Jeffrey Epstein's residence at 9 East 71st Street, New York, NY, for evidence related to sex trafficking of minors (18 U.S.C. § 1591) and conspiracy (18 U.S.C. § 371). The warrant specifically targets computers, storage media, and photographs regarding victims, potential victims, and nude or suggestive images of teenage girls or younger.
EFTA00008892.pdf
This document is a Grand Jury exhibit (GX-2) from the US v. Ghislaine Maxwell case, dated June 29, 2020. It compiles evidence including photos of Epstein properties, extensive flight logs from 1994-1998 documenting travel by Epstein, Maxwell, and various associates (including 'Space', Glen Dubin, and Clair Hazell) on aircraft N908JE and N988JE. It includes correspondence regarding a $200,000 donation to Interlochen Arts Camp and transcripts from Maxwell's 2016 deposition where she denies knowledge of underage recruitment, sex toys, or giving massages.
EFTA00008716.pdf
This document is a Grand Jury Presentation from June 2020 in the case US v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It compiles evidence including photographs of Epstein's properties, flight logs from 1994-1998 showing Maxwell and others traveling with Epstein, records of a donation to Interlochen Arts Camp, and excerpts from Maxwell's 2016 deposition where she denies knowledge of underage recruitment or sexual misconduct. The flight logs notably list prominent figures such as Senator George Mitchell and Bill Richardson.
EFTA00008599.pdf
This document is a 2019 SDNY presentation containing evidence against Jeffrey Epstein from the 2004-2005 period. It includes photos of his NY and Palm Beach properties, handwritten message slips explicitly referencing 'females' and scheduling encounters, financial records of cash deposits, call logs connecting NY and Florida, and flight records for N908JE. Notable evidence includes a message slip recording a call from Donald Trump and flight manifests placing Epstein on specific trips between New York and Palm Beach.
Evidence List from U.S. v. Maxwell
This document is an FBI evidence recovery log detailing items seized in relation to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. The inventory includes significant quantities of digital devices (hard drives, laptops, towers), surveillance footage, financial records including large amounts of cash in envelopes marked 'SK', and personal items such as massage tables, sex toys, and photos of naked females. Specific items of note include blueprints for Epstein's NYC residence, boat logs for LSJ (Little St. James), and an Austrian passport featuring Epstein's photograph.
DOJ-OGR-00022172.tif
This document appears to be an inventory or evidence log detailing various items, including photos, personal effects, and documents, many of which are sexually explicit or related to financial records. It also lists several court-authorized intercepts (ELSUR) and a recorded interview with Holly Arace in Philadelphia, indicating ongoing investigative activities. The inventory includes blueprints for Epstein's residence at 9 East 71st Street, New York, and surveillance footage of Bradford, NH.
DOJ-OGR-00000814.jpg
This document is page 31 of a court order filed on July 18, 2019, denying bail or highlighting flight risks for Jeffrey Epstein. The Court notes Epstein's vast wealth (earning over $10 million/year), his international residences (France, USVI), and the lack of clarity regarding his total assets. The judge dismisses the defense's offer of a $100 million bond and rejects the proposal of paid 'trustees' to monitor Epstein due to the conflict of interest inherent in their salary.
DOJ-OGR-00000502.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, outlines the prosecution's argument against granting bail to the defendant, Mr. Epstein. It highlights the lack of detailed financial disclosure, Epstein's substantial international income (at least $10 million annually), and his residences in the U.S. Virgin Islands and Paris, all of which contribute to him being a significant flight risk. The document also criticizes a vague proposal for salaried "trustees" to monitor him and notes that his New York property is already subject to a forfeiture allegation.
DOJ-OGR-00000269.jpg
This document is page 12 of a legal indictment filed on July 2, 2019, which outlines the forfeiture allegations against defendant Jeffrey Epstein. It states that as a result of the offenses alleged in Count Two, Epstein must forfeit property used in or derived from the crime, specifically identifying a property at 9 East 71st Street in New York, New York, owned by Maple, Inc.
DOJ-OGR-00016907.jpg
This page is a transcript from a court proceeding (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Attorney Ms. Menninger argues that prior testimony from Jeffrey Epstein regarding his move to 9 East 71st Street (which he stated was around 1996) is relevant because a witness named 'Jane' claimed he lived there in 1994. The Court sustains an objection to this line of argument, referencing a prior ruling regarding the 'motive to develop' testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00004675.jpg
This document is a confidential transcript of grand jury testimony filed on May 25, 2021. In it, a witness confirms the location of Mr. Epstein's New York residence as 9 East 71st Street. The questioner then directs the witness to testify about the high schools attended by the 'various victims' involved in the case, referencing specific paragraphs of a proposed indictment.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity