| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
aircraft
N/A
|
Creator of theory |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-01-01 | Legal case | Court case US v. Gardner, 523 F. Supp. 2d 1025. | N.D. Cal. | View |
This legal document, filed on August 6, 2025, argues for the unsealing of grand jury transcripts related to Epstein and Maxwell's criminal scheme, advocating for the redaction of victims' names while opposing similar protection for third-party enablers. It references a July 6, 2025 Memorandum and several civil cases, asserting that transparency and accountability necessitate the release of information concerning individuals involved in sex trafficking.
This legal document, filed on behalf of victim Annie Farmer by her counsel Sigrid S. McCawley, argues for the unsealing of grand jury transcripts related to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The filing supports redacting victims' personal information for privacy but strongly opposes redacting the names of co-conspirators and enablers, asserting that their identities should be public to ensure accountability and justice. It references other civil lawsuits against entities like JP Morgan and Deutsche Bank as part of a broader effort to hold third parties involved in the sex-trafficking scheme accountable.
This document is page 3 of a legal filing (Document 24) from July 16, 2019, addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490). The text argues for the defendant's right to bail, contending that denying bail based on wealth violates the Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments. It cites specific case law (Brinson, Afyare, Gardner) to argue that the presumption against release in § 1591 prosecutions is rebuttable.
This document is page 3 of a legal filing addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman, dated July 16, 2019. The author argues that denying bail to a defendant based on their wealth is unconstitutional, violating the Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments by thwarting the presumption of innocence and due process. The document cites several federal court cases as precedent to support the claim that suitable conditions for release can be found even in presumption cases.
This document is a page from a legal filing that analyzes the psychological underpinnings of sexual offending, citing numerous academic sources. It discusses concepts like 'offence scripts' and 'mental simulations' as automatic action plans for offenders, and explores the 'need to belong' as a potential motivator stemming from dysfunctional backgrounds and low self-esteem. The text also defines and describes 'grooming the child' as a common form of sexual grooming, comparing it to adult courtship and outlining different dynamics in intrafamilial abuse.
This handwritten legal document argues that Congress intentionally excluded specific child abuse definitions found in § 3509(a) when making technical corrections in 1994, suggesting these definitions apply to civil reporting rather than criminal statutes. The text cites legal precedents such as *Ibarra v. Holder*, *Jama v. Immigration & Customs Enforcement*, and *Brown v. Gardner* to support principles of statutory interpretation regarding congressional intent and context.
This document is an email printout dated November 1, 2016, forwarded by Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'Jeffrey E.' and email 'jeevacation@gmail.com') to himself. The email subject is 'contacts' and contains a raw, unstructured list of names including prominent scientists (Susskind, Dawkins, Gellman), tech figures (Thiel, Hoffman, Sergey), and political figures (Clinton, Kerry, Schumer, Ehud Barak, Prince Andrew). It also contains a line of apparent medical/personal notes regarding cholesterol medication (Crestor), prostate issues, and diet.
This document is an email sent by Jeffrey Epstein to himself on October 30, 2016, with the subject line 'contacts'. The body of the email contains a list of high-profile names, including prominent scientists (Susskind, Minsky/Edelman context, Gould), tech figures (Hoffman, Sinofsky, Sergey), and politicians (Clinton, Richardson, Mandelson, Ehud, Andrew). It also includes a section seemingly related to health or medication (Crestor, prostatitis, protein, exercise) and obscure codes or abbreviations (LSJ, BBJ).
This document appears to be a page (293) from an academic book or paper discussing elements of preschool curriculum and their alignment with Gardner's Multiple Intelligences theory. It includes a table listing capabilities such as linguistic, social, and scientific skills evaluated in preschool settings like Montessori and Waldorf. The page bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013209' stamp, indicating it was included as an exhibit in a House Oversight investigation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity