Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Tyson

Person
Mentions
6
Relationships
1
Events
1
Documents
3
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
1 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Unnamed Victim (Delaware)
Perpetrator victim
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2025-11-12 N/A Tyson's prior rape conviction Delaware View

DOJ-OGR-00004854.jpg

This legal document, a court filing from 2021-07-02, discusses the admissibility of 'prior bad acts' evidence in a case involving Cosby and Constad. The Superior Court affirmed that evidence of Cosby's 'unique sexual assault playbook' was admissible to demonstrate a common plan, despite dissimilarities in the nature and location of the alleged assaults and the temporal gap between them. The court emphasized that the pattern of behavior, rather than absolute identicality of incidents, determines admissibility under Rule 404(b).

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00004853.jpg

This document is a page from a legal filing in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed July 2, 2021. It contains a legal argument citing *Commonwealth v. Tyson* and the Bill Cosby case to discuss the admissibility of Rule 404(b) evidence ('prior bad acts') to establish a common plan or scheme. The text details the legal reasoning for admitting evidence of a prior rape conviction in the *Tyson* case despite a twelve-year gap, using this as precedent to discuss Constand's allegations against Cosby.

Legal filing / court opinion excerpt
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00004850.jpg

This document is page 38 of a legal filing from the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on July 2, 2021. It discusses legal arguments regarding the admissibility of 'prior bad acts' evidence and the 'doctrine of chances,' heavily citing Pennsylvania case law involving Bill Cosby (Commonwealth v. Cosby) and Andrea Constand. The text argues that the similarity of crimes can outweigh the remoteness in time between incidents.

Court filing / legal brief (case law citation)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search