NY Post
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Brian Zak
|
Employment |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Federal Bureau of Prisons
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-15 | N/A | Publication of NY Post article regarding Epstein jail guards declining a plea deal. | New York | View |
EFTA00011046.pdf
This document is an internal email from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY), dated January 25, 2021, distributing daily news clippings. The email, sent by Spokesman Nicholas Biase, includes a list of hyperlinks to articles from various media outlets covering topics such as the Capitol riot, Donald Trump, and significantly, an article about how Ghislaine Maxwell was located by the FBI via her phone. The recipient list is redacted.
EFTA00010303.pdf
This document is an email chain between USANYS officials dated November 15-16, 2019 (referencing Bates EFTA00010303). The discussion concerns a New York Post article reporting that jail guards assigned to Jeffrey Epstein had declined a plea deal. The officials speculate that the correctional officers' union was the source of the leak to the press.
EFTA00009965.pdf
An email chain from September 12, 2019, between officials at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. They are discussing a New York Post article regarding a victim of Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondence confirms that the office has previously spoken to and interviewed the specific victim mentioned in the article, with one official asking how much of the article's content was covered in their interview.
DOJ-OGR-00019572.jpg
This legal document, dated August 24, 2020, is a filing on behalf of Ms. Maxwell to Judge Alison J. Nathan. It argues for the continued sealing of certain court documents, with redactions, to protect Ms. Maxwell's right to a fair trial from pretrial publicity. The filing references the government's own public statements about its ongoing investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's associates as evidence of the high-profile nature of the case.
DOJ-OGR-00025261.jpg
This document is an internal Federal Bureau of Prisons email from July 30, 2019, finalizing a response to a NY Post media inquiry about inmate Jeffrey Epstein. The reporter asked for an update on Epstein's condition following a neck injury and his current housing status at the New York MCC. The email shows BOP staff deciding to reuse a standard response, which confirms Epstein is at MCC New York but declines to provide further details on his medical status or conditions of confinement, citing privacy and security reasons.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019105.jpg
An email from attorney Darren Indyke to Jeffrey Epstein (jeevacation@gmail.com) dated August 17, 2016, marked as high importance. The subject concerns a forthcoming book by James Patterson alleging a federal cover-up regarding Epstein, claiming Steven Hoffenberg is involved in the writing. The actual content of the email is redacted for privilege, but the attachments list various legal documents and correspondence involving Hoffenberg and the NY Post.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026655.jpg
This document is an email from Jamie Glick (PR Specialist at Latham & Watkins) to Kathy Ruemmler dated January 23, 2017. The email circulates press coverage regarding Ruemmler's representation of a Vocativ journalist arrested during the Inauguration Day protests in D.C. The document includes commentary questioning the relationship between Ruemmler and Mati Kochavi, specifically asking what services she provides to his intelligence operations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027818.jpg
This document is a digital forensic extraction report (likely from the House Oversight Committee) showing a message log from June 20-21, 2019. The user 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (a known alias for Jeffrey Epstein) exchanges messages with a redacted individual, sharing a NY Post article about the Bidens and discussing a 'New York magazine story.' The conversation ends with the ominous phrase 'Not for texts,' suggesting the participants wished to move the conversation to a more secure or non-digital medium.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027361.jpg
This document is a forensic extraction log from the House Oversight Committee showing a digital conversation between 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an alias associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation takes place between July 28 and July 29, 2018. The exchange involves sharing a NY Post article about a 'cryptocurrency king' and Steve Bannon, mentioning a Rolling Stone article, and checking if the other party is 'around' to talk.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011942.jpg
This document, likely an excerpt from a book or investigative report found in House Oversight files, details the history of allegations against modeling agent Jean-Luc Brunel. It cites a 1988 '60 Minutes' investigation accusing Brunel of drugging and raping models, quotes his rival John Casablancas calling him a predator, and explicitly links Brunel to Jeffrey Epstein, noting that Brunel avoided testifying at Epstein's trial and traveled on Epstein's private jet with young girls.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025502.jpg
This document is a forensic log of electronic messages exchanged between 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an alias often associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual on June 9 and 10, 2019. The conversation involves scheduling a meeting for '2 pm', the redacted individual advising the recipient to sleep to be a 'world class opponent', and the sharing of a NY Post article regarding Steve Bannon and Joe Biden. The document appears to be part of a House Oversight Committee investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025452.jpg
This document is a digital forensic extraction of an iMessage conversation from May 9, 2019, between 'jee' (jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual. The redacted sender shares a NY Post article link about Jeffrey Epstein allegedly building an illegal compound in the Virgin Islands. 'Jee' responds by questioning the article's claims ('Underwater office ?') and calling the authors 'nuts,' then shifts the topic to a TV episode involving the FBI and someone named Bain.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025447.jpg
This document is a digital forensic log of text messages exchanged between March 25 and March 29, 2019. The messages primarily consist of links to NY Post articles concerning legal charges against Michael Avenatti. Specific senders include 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' and a redacted individual who mentions sending a 'bd present' (birthday present).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029766.jpg
This document is an email chain from April 2011 in which Lesley Groff forwards a text (originating from Scott Denett) to Jeffrey Epstein and Darren Indyke. The forwarded text is a critical article or blog post summarizing Epstein's return to New York, his controversial comments to the NY Post comparing his crimes to 'stealing a bagel,' and his housing situation near a school. The text also details a housewarming dinner attended by high-profile media figures and Prince Andrew, as well as financial details regarding payments to victims and the value of his home provided by Leslie Wexner.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029336.jpg
An email from Richard Kahn to Jeffrey Epstein dated March 25, 2013, with the subject 'google search'. Kahn reports that he performed a search (referred to as 'jee google') and believes the results look 'very good'. The body of the email lists eight Google search results, including links to Wikipedia, NY Mag, NY Post, and Epstein's own foundation websites, with snippets mentioning his connections to high-profile figures like Leslie Wexner, Ghislaine Maxwell, Donald Trump, and Bill Clinton, as well as references to his sex offender status.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033359.jpg
An email dated May 22, 2019, from associate Richard Kahn to Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias email jeevacation@gmail.com). The email contains links to news articles from CNBC and the NY Post regarding President Trump's political statements and a Rose Garden press conference. The document includes the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033359.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016471.jpg
An email exchange from December 2018 between NY Post reporter Susan Edelman and Danny Frost, Director of Communications for the Manhattan DA. Edelman requests information regarding the Epstein case. Frost declines, stating the brief is filed under seal pursuant to Civil Rights Law § 50-b to protect sex offense victims; Edelman challenges this, noting that typically only victim names are redacted, not the entire document.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016470.jpg
An email exchange from December 5, 2018, between NY Post reporter Susan Edelman and Manhattan DA Communications Director Danny Frost. Frost asks if a requested 'cover page' is for publication or background information, noting that publication requires legal review. Edelman confirms the request is for her information only, not for publication.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016469.jpg
An email chain from December 5, 2018, between reporter Susan Edelman and Danny Frost, the Director of Communications for the Manhattan DA. Edelman questions Frost regarding an attached document, specifically asking if a judge ordered it sealed or if the sealing was merely stated by the DA's office, noting that the cover page is unclear. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016468.jpg
This document is an email exchange from December 5, 2018, between Susan Edelman (NY Post Reporter) and Danny Frost (Director of Communications for Manhattan DA Cy Vance, Jr.). Edelman inquires about a specific date and whether a court order exists to seal a document. Frost responds with the date 'August 2011.' The document contains the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016468.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016467.jpg
An email exchange from December 5, 2018, between NY Post reporter Susan Edelman and Manhattan DA Communications Director Danny Frost. Edelman questions whether the DA's office unilaterally sealed a document without a hearing. Frost responds that they are bound by Civil Rights Law § 50-b rather than a court order. The document bears a House Oversight Committee stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016465.jpg
This document is an email chain from December 6, 2018, between NY Post reporter Susan Edelman and Danny Frost, Director of Communications for the Manhattan District Attorney. Edelman questions why the DA's office sealed documents in the Epstein case rather than filing a redacted brief, accusing them of covering up facts. Frost responds that sealing is routine practice under Civil Rights Law § 50-b for sex crimes but confirms the DA's office will not oppose a petition by the Post to unseal a redacted brief.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022436.jpg
This document is a screenshot of a webpage article discussing real estate trends and the tension between new development and long-standing local businesses in New York City's Yorkville neighborhood. The document contains no mention of Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or related activities. Its potential inclusion in an Epstein-related document set is likely due to the Bates number 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022436' at the bottom, indicating it was produced as part of a larger collection for a congressional committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022435.jpg
This document is a news article, likely from the NY Post, detailing a real estate boom in the Yorkville neighborhood of Manhattan. The article discusses major development projects by companies like Extell Development and Icon Realty, rising property values, and the impact of the upcoming Second Avenue subway. Despite the request to analyze it as an 'Epstein-related document', the content of the article itself contains no mention of Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, properties, or any related activities.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022251.jpg
This document is a July 2010 article by Conchita Sarnoff criticizing the handling of Jeffrey Epstein's case following his release from custody. It details his lenient sentence, a post-release party attended by prominent figures like Prince Andrew and Katie Couric, and legal loopholes that allowed him to avoid proper sex offender registration in New York. The author questions the inaction of Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance and highlights the ongoing risk Epstein posed to the community.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity