Palm Beach County Stockade
LocationRelationship Network
002.pdf
A summons issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on May 1, 2009, for Case Number 09-80656. The summons is directed to Jeffrey Epstein, located at the Palm Beach County Stockade, notifying him of a lawsuit filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe 102. It lists his defense counsel as Jack A. Goldberger and Robert D. Critton, Jr., and requires a response to the plaintiff's attorneys, Podhurst Orseck, P.A., within 20 days.
002.pdf
Summons in a Civil Case issued on April 17, 2009, by the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida for Case No. 09-80591 (Jane Doe 101 v. Jeffrey Epstein). The document summons Jeffrey Epstein, noted as being located at the Palm Beach County Stockade, to answer the complaint within 20 days. It lists Epstein's defense counsel (Spicer, Goldberger, Critton) and the plaintiff's attorneys (Josefsberg and Ezell of Podhurst Orseck, P.A.).
001.pdf
This document is a civil complaint filed on April 17, 2009, by Jane Doe No. 101 against Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida. The plaintiff alleges that in 2003, when she was a 17-year-old high school student, she was recruited and transported to Epstein's Palm Beach mansion where she was sexually assaulted under the guise of giving massages. The complaint asserts causes of action under 18 U.S.C. § 2255 regarding coercion, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking, and transport of child pornography.
EFTA00031937.pdf
A 2009 article from PalmBeachDailyNews.com details Jeffrey Epstein's release from Palm Beach County jail to serve one year of probation at his home without electronic monitoring. The article includes reactions from victims (Jane Doe No. 3 and No. 5) and their attorneys, who express outrage at the leniency of the sentence and fear of Epstein's wealth and influence. It also lists the specific conditions of his probation, including a curfew and restrictions on contact with minors.
EFTA00014110.pdf
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida to attorney Roy Black regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The letter alleges that Epstein's participation in a work release program constitutes a material breach of his Non-Prosecution Agreement, which required incarceration without community control. The U.S. Attorney demands Epstein withdraw from the program and complete his eighteen-month term of imprisonment as agreed.
DOJ-OGR-00021363.jpg
This page from a DOJ OPR report analyzes the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) negotiations between the USAO and Epstein's defense. It concludes that while prosecutor Villafaña's emails to defense attorney Lefkowitz appeared accommodating—suggesting 'off campus' meetings and venue changes to avoid press—OPR did not find evidence that these actions were motivated by improper favoritism or that Acosta's breakfast meeting with Lefkowitz materially altered the sentence. The document notes that state officials, not the USAO, were responsible for granting Epstein work release privileges.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017973.jpg
This document is a Miami Herald article filed as a court exhibit (Case 1:19-cv-03377) describing Jeffrey Epstein's 2008 work release conditions. It details how Epstein paid Palm Beach Sheriff's deputies to monitor him while he spent up to 12 hours a day at his office, where he met with male and female visitors behind closed doors without deputy supervision. The article notes that visitor logs from this time were kept in a safe but no longer exist, and highlights how deputies began referring to him as a 'client' rather than an 'inmate'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017972.jpg
This document is a court filing containing a Miami Herald article that details the 2008 sentencing of Jeffrey Epstein. It highlights collusion between prosecutors and Epstein's defense to minimize the judge's awareness of other crimes and co-conspirators, specifically citing a 2007 email from federal prosecutor A. Marie Villafaña. It also notes that victims' attorney Spencer Kuvin was present by chance but was unaware the hearing would dispose of his client's case without their notification.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017811.jpg
This document is a page from a Miami Herald article filed as a court exhibit (House Oversight). It investigates how the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office, under Sheriff Ric Bradshaw, allowed Jeffrey Epstein to participate in a work release program despite agency rules prohibiting sex offenders from doing so. Spokeswoman Therese Barbera defended the decision via email but refused to account for money Epstein paid the office for private details.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017801.jpg
This document is a printout of a November 2018 Miami Herald article by Julie K. Brown, filed as an exhibit in a 2019 court case and marked with a House Oversight Committee stamp. The article details Jeffrey Epstein's 2008 sentencing, where despite facing a potential federal life sentence for abusing underage girls, he received a lenient 18-month state sentence due to a non-prosecution agreement signed by U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta. It highlights the extraordinary privileges Epstein received during incarceration, including work release for 12 hours a day and a private jail wing.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023008.jpg
This document is a timeline, likely from a Miami Herald article included in House Oversight records, detailing the legal proceedings against Jeffrey Epstein between May 2008 and July 2009. It covers his guilty plea to state solicitation charges, his 18-month sentencing, the subsequent work release program where he spent 12 hours a day at his office, and his early release in 2009. The text also highlights the Miami Herald's investigative work ('Perversion of Justice') in exposing the deal and the lack of notification provided to victims under the Crime Victims' Rights Act.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015029.jpg
This document is a printout of a news article (likely Palm Beach Post) dated September 27, 2017, discussing the potential reopening of the Jeffrey Epstein case. It details the legal arguments by victims' lawyers Edwards and Cassell that the 2008 non-prosecution agreement was illegal because federal prosecutors (including Alex Acosta and Marie Villafana) failed to confer with victims as required by the Crime Victims' Rights Act. The text highlights the secrecy of the deal, the alleged deception of victims via letters claiming the investigation was ongoing, and the involvement of high-profile figures like Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013426.jpg
This document is a LexisNexis printout of a Sun-Sentinel article from June 15, 2009, detailing a legal battle to unseal Jeffrey Epstein's plea deal with federal prosecutors. Palm Beach Circuit Judge Jeff Colbath acknowledged procedural failures in sealing the deal and set a hearing for June 25, while attorneys for Epstein's victims, Bill Berger and Brad Edwards, criticized the "sweetheart agreement" and special treatment Epstein received. The article notes Epstein was serving an 18-month sentence with work release privileges and that local police had forwarded information to the FBI due to dissatisfaction with the State Attorney's handling of the case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022211.jpg
This article from The Virgin Islands Daily News (reprinted from the Miami Herald) details how federal prosecutors admitted in 2013 to bowing to pressure from Jeffrey Epstein's legal team, led by Kenneth Starr, regarding the non-prosecution agreement and victim notifications. It highlights the disparity between Epstein's lenient treatment—including work release and a private jail section—and the severity of his crimes involving dozens of underage girls. The document also references the 2008 sentencing hearing, the FBI's unfiled 2007 indictment, and the frustrations of local law enforcement officers like Detective Joseph Recarey.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021655.jpg
A June 10, 2009, article from The Palm Beach Post reporting on legal efforts to unseal Jeffrey Epstein's confidential non-prosecution agreement with federal prosecutors. Attorneys for The Post and victims (including 'E.W.') argue the public has a right to know the details of the 'unprecedented' deal that allowed Epstein to plead guilty to state charges and avoid federal prosecution. The article details the sidebar conference where the deal was originally sealed by Judge Pucillo and notes Epstein's connections to high-profile figures like Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, and Prince Andrew.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021653.jpg
An FBI FD-350 form containing a Palm Beach Post article from April 10, 2009. The article details a new civil lawsuit (the 12th) filed by attorney Robert Josefsberg on behalf of 'Jane Doe 101' against Jeffrey Epstein, alleging sexual abuse of a minor. It also discusses ongoing discovery disputes lead by attorney Adam Horowitz and notes Epstein's incarceration status at the Palm Beach County Stockade.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021647.jpg
An FBI file containing a 2008 Palm Beach Post article detailing Jeffrey Epstein's work-release program while serving an 18-month sentence for soliciting prostitution. The article reveals Epstein was allowed to leave jail six days a week (Friday through Wednesday, 10 a.m. to 10 p.m.) to work at his West Palm Beach office, monitored by GPS and a private deputy paid for by Epstein. Attorneys representing his victims expressed shock that they were not notified of his release until weeks after it began.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021564.jpg
This FBI Electronic Communication from October 7, 2008, requests the assistance of Assistant Legal Attachés at unspecified US Embassies to hand-deliver Victim Notification Letters to victims residing overseas. The letters, originating from the US Attorney's Office, inform the victims about the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between the US Government and Jeffrey Epstein. The document notes that Epstein was incarcerated at the Palm Beach County Stockade serving an 18-month sentence at the time.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity