USCA
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-07 | N/A | USCA Mandate affirming denial of bail | Second Circuit Court of App... | View |
| 2021-01-12 | N/A | Appeal Record Sent to USCA (Electronic File). | Electronic File | View |
DOJ-OGR-00019784.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet (Case 21-58) covering entries from November 6, 2020, to December 1, 2020, related to the prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell. Key events include the dismissal of an appeal by the Second Circuit, extensions granted for discovery deadlines, and disputes regarding the timing of evidence disclosure. Significant attention is paid to Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the MDC, with Judge Nathan ordering the parties to confer with Warden Heriberto Tellez regarding the defendant's concerns.
DOJ-OGR-00019783.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet page from the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from September 8, 2020, to November 5, 2020. It details procedural events including the transmission of appeal records, the placement of sealed documents in a vault, and the appearance of attorney Bobbi Sternheim. The docket also lists a series of letters between the prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz) and the defense (Everdell, Pagliuca) regarding requests to delay disclosure and investigative files, culminating in a Brady disclosure order signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00019769.jpg
This document is a court docket entry for Case 21-58, dated March 24, 2021. It records two main activities: the electronic transmission of Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal record to the U.S. Court of Appeals (USCA) and the placement of three separate sealed documents (numbered 174, 175, and 176) into a vault.
DOJ-OGR-00019764.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from January 2021 detailing procedural events in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Key events include the granting of laptop access for discovery review, a subsequent request by the Bureau of Prisons to vacate that order, and the filing of multiple motions by Maxwell's defense team to dismiss charges or separate trials. It also records the transmission of appeal records to the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals.
DOJ-OGR-00019758.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from November 6, 2020, to December 1, 2020. It details various procedural filings, including discovery deadline extensions, an affidavit from AUSA Maurene Comey, and the dismissal of an appeal by the Second Circuit. Notably, it includes orders regarding Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the MDC, specifically ordering parties to confer regarding Warden Heriberto Tellez addressing her concerns.
DOJ-OGR-00019757.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet for Case 21-58 (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) covering proceedings from September 8, 2020, to November 5, 2020. It logs the transmission of appeal records to the USCA, the placement of several sealed documents in a vault, and the appearance of attorney Bobbi Sternheim for the defense. The docket details a series of legal correspondence between the prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz) and the defense (Everdell, Pagliuca) regarding requests to delay disclosure and investigative files, culminating in a judge's order regarding Brady disclosure obligations.
DOJ-OGR-00019735.jpg
This document is a court record dated January 12, 2021, detailing the transmission of the appeal record and certified indexed electronic files concerning Ghislaine Maxwell's Notice of Appeal (document 113) to the U.S. Court of Appeals. It is part of Case 21-58 and is page 20 of 20, bearing the Bates number DOJ-OGR-00019735.
DOJ-OGR-00019729.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet (Case 21-58) detailing filings between November 6, 2020, and December 1, 2020, related to the prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell. Key entries include the dismissal of an appeal by the Second Circuit, orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan extending discovery deadlines, and specific orders regarding Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the MDC, including a directive involving Warden Heriberto Tellez. The document lists correspondence between the prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz) and the defense (Sternheim) regarding discovery materials and detention conditions.
DOJ-OGR-00019728.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-58) covering filings between September 8, 2020, and November 5, 2020. It details the transmission of appeal notices, the placement of sealed documents in a vault, the appearance of attorney Bobbi Sternheim, and a series of letters between the Prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz) and Defense (Everdell, Pagliuca) regarding disclosure delays and investigative files. The log concludes with Judge Nathan issuing an order confirming the government's Brady disclosure obligations pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act.
DOJ-OGR-00019706.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet (Page 13 of 19) for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from November 6, 2020, to December 1, 2020. It details various procedural filings including letters from the prosecution (USA) and defense regarding discovery deadlines, conditions of confinement at the MDC, and the dismissal of an appeal by the Second Circuit. Key events include Judge Nathan setting new deadlines for motions and discovery, and ordering parties to confer regarding Maxwell's request for Warden Heriberto Tellez to address her detention conditions.
DOJ-OGR-00019705.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-58), covering filings between September 8, 2020, and November 5, 2020. It records procedural events including the transmission of appeal records, the placement of sealed documents in a vault, and the appearance of attorney Bobbi Sternheim. The docket also details a back-and-forth correspondence between the Prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz) and Defense (Everdell, Pagliuca) regarding the delay of disclosure of materials and the review of investigative files, culminating in a Rule 5(f) order by Judge Nathan confirming Brady disclosure obligations.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity