| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey M. Herman
|
Client |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Stuart S. Mermelstein
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Adam D. Horowitz
|
Client |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal filing | A request for a protective order was filed, asking that the deposition in a criminal case and a c... | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of Witness Y. Doe (Cancelled by agreement). | Unknown | View |
| 2008-04-02 | N/A | Withdrawal of Motion for Protective Order filed by Witness Y. Doe. | Circuit Court of the 15th J... | View |
| 2008-03-31 | Legal filing | Attorneys for Witness Y. Doe filed a request for a protective order to require that the witness's... | United States District Cour... | View |
This legal document, dated March 31, 2008, is a motion for a protective order filed by the law firm Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. on behalf of 'Witness Y. Doe'. The motion requests that the court order the witness's deposition for an unspecified criminal case and the civil case 'Jane Doe No. 3 v. Jeffrey Epstein' to be conducted simultaneously. The stated purpose is to prevent potential harassment of the witness by the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein.
This is a legal notice filed on April 2, 2008, in the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County, Florida (Case No. 502006CF009454AXXXMB). Attorneys for 'Witness Y. Doe' (Herman & Mermelstein, P.A.) are withdrawing a Motion for Protective Order because Jeffrey Epstein's counsel agreed to cancel the deposition of Y. Doe. The document includes contact information for the attorneys and bears a 2017 public records request footer.
This legal document, dated March 31, 2008, is a request for a protective order filed by the law firm Herman & Mermelstein on behalf of 'Witness Y. Doe'. The motion asks the court to require that depositions for a criminal case and a civil case, 'Jane Doe No. 3 v. Jeffrey Epstein', be conducted at the same time to prevent harassment of the witness by Defendant Epstein. The filing states that counsel for the State and for Epstein were contacted about this request but have not responded.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity