| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jane Doe
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jack Goldberger, Esq.
|
Adversarial professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Luttier
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-09-17 | N/A | Attempted deposition of Epstein. Epstein and his driver, Igor Zinoviev, exited in a separate elev... | Deposition location | View |
| 2009-09-17 | N/A | Adam Horowitz, Esq. announced that the deposition was cancelled because Epstein and his client (P... | Deposition location | View |
| 2009-09-17 | N/A | Presence of court reporter, videographer, Mr. Hill (for C.M.A.), Adam Langino (for B.B.), and Wil... | Deposition location | View |
| 2008-02-06 | Scheduled deposition | The date for which Jane Doe's deposition was unilaterally scheduled by Mr. Goldberger. | N/A | View |
| 2008-01-25 | Legal communication | Epstein's attorney, Jack Goldberger, contacted Jane Doe's attorney (the undersigned) to schedule ... | N/A | View |
This document, a court filing from September 17, 2009, details the events surrounding an attempted deposition of Epstein that was ultimately cancelled. Epstein's attorneys initially decided he would not attend, but he later attempted to leave the building and watch via video feed, only to encounter the Plaintiff at the exit, leading to the deposition's cancellation due to the Plaintiff's distress.
This legal document, page 2 of a filing, details a dispute between opposing counsel regarding the deposition of "Jane Doe." The author, Jane Doe's attorney, alleges that Epstein's attorney, Jack Goldberger, ignored an agreement to find a mutually convenient date and improperly served subpoenas on both Jane Doe and her out-of-state mother for a date he knew Jane Doe's counsel was unavailable. The filing argues that the service on the mother was legally defective.
The undersigned called Mr. Goldberger on Friday evening to remind him of their earlier agreement and insist that the deposition be re-noticed after Jane Doe was served.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity