Shaw
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-01-01 | Legal case | The court case United States v. Shaw, 891 F.3d 441 (3rd Cir. 2017) is cited. | 3rd Cir. | View |
| 2003-01-01 | Legal case | Legal case: United States v. Shaw, 260 F. Supp. 2d 567 | U.S. District Court for the... | View |
DOJ-OGR-00002107.jpg
This legal document, filed on December 14, 2020, argues for the extradition of Ms. Maxwell to the United States. It contends that a U.S. trial would best serve the interests of the victims and that it is highly unlikely Ms. Maxwell could successfully oppose extradition on the grounds of her physical or mental health, as the legal threshold for such an argument is exceptionally high.
DOJ-OGR-00003074.jpg
This legal document, page 140 of a court filing from April 16, 2021, outlines the legal standard for a defendant to obtain a "Franks hearing" to challenge the validity of an affidavit used for probable cause. It details the three-part test a defendant must meet, requiring a "substantial preliminary showing" of inaccuracies or omissions in the affidavit that were material and made with deliberate falsehood or reckless disregard for the truth. The document explains that a court must then determine the materiality of these errors by revising the affidavit to see if it still supports a finding of probable cause.
DOJ-OGR-00002957.jpg
This document is page xxii of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, Document 204), filed on April 16, 2021. It is a table of authorities, listing numerous legal cases from 'United States v. Schafrick' to 'United States v. Swanson,' along with their legal citations and the page numbers where they are referenced within the main document. The cases cited span from 1972 to 2015 and originate from various federal district and circuit courts.
DOJ-OGR-00005190.jpg
This handwritten legal document, filed on October 12, 2021, analyzes the legislative history and judicial interpretation of U.S. federal sexual abuse laws. It discusses the 1986 Sexual Abuse Act (SAA), its relationship with the Victim of Child Abuse Act and specific statutes like §3283, and cites court cases such as U.S. v. Shaw (2017) and U.S. v. Haynsworth (1997) to illustrate how courts have defined terms and applied the law. The note also references legislative proposals from 1984 and 1990 concerning statutes of limitations and legal definitions.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013719.jpg
This document is page 219 of a scientific paper found within House Oversight files (marked HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013719). It discusses complex mathematical concepts regarding chaos theory, specifically Lyapounov exponents and the Rössler attractor, and applies these concepts to neurosciences, specifically the prediction of epileptic seizures via EEG analysis. The text cites various researchers between 1979 and 1996. While part of the Epstein-related file dump, the page itself contains no direct information regarding Jeffrey Epstein, his finances, or his associates, other than potentially being work funded by or of interest to him.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013701.jpg
This document captures page 201 of a scientific text discussing chaos theory, strange attractors, and ergodic theory within dynamical systems. It references several prominent physicists and mathematicians (Yorke, Ruelle, Takens). The page contains a Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013701', indicating it is part of a document production to the House Oversight Committee, likely related to investigations into Jeffrey Epstein, who was known to fund and associate with scientists in these fields.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013699.jpg
This document is page 199 of a scientific text discussing chaos theory, dynamical systems, and renormalization group equations. It cites various physicists and mathematicians, most notably Mitchell Feigenbaum, regarding bifurcation and universal constants. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, suggesting it was collected as evidence in a congressional investigation, likely related to Jeffrey Epstein's known patronage of and interest in theoretical physicists and scientific research.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity