| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Richard Gatling
|
Inventor patron |
6
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | American Civil War usage of early Gatling guns. | American South | View |
| N/A | N/A | American Civil War usage of Gatling guns. | USA | View |
| N/A | N/A | Assassination of Abraham Lincoln | Ford Theater | View |
| 1865-04-14 | N/A | Assassination of Abraham Lincoln and attacks on Seward/Johnson. | USA | View |
| 1863-11-19 | N/A | Gettysburg Cemetery Dedication | Gettysburg | View |
This document is a printout of an email sent by author/journalist Edward Jay Epstein (signed 'Ed') to Jeffrey Epstein (indicated by the 'JEE' footer). The email contains the text of an article or book review discussing conspiracy theories, referencing Rob Brotherton's work, the Lincoln assassination, and confirmation bias. It concludes with a 'Happy New Year' wish and a link to a Wall Street Journal article from late 2015.
This document is an email sent on December 19, 2015, from 'Ed' (journalist Edward Jay Epstein) to Jeffrey Epstein. The email contains the full text of an article Edward published in the Wall Street Journal the previous day titled 'They're Not Really Out to Get You.' The article reviews Rob Brotherton's book 'Suspicious Minds' and discusses the psychology behind conspiracy theories, distinguishing between real criminal conspiracies and 'pseudo-conspiracies.'
This document consists of pages 92 and 93 from a biography about Jeffrey Epstein, labeled with a House Oversight footer. It details his early life (1969-1976), specifically his time at Cooper Union starting at age 16, his Brooklyn accent, and his tutoring work. It also includes recollections from a classmate, James Rosen, regarding their upbringing in Sea Gate/Lafayette and the ethnic tensions of the neighborhood.
This document is the tail end of an email sent by Cecile (likely Cecile de Jongh). The body of the email appears to paste a news report or article discussing diplomatic tensions between the U.S. and Antigua regarding intellectual property theft and settlement options. It quotes U.S. spokeswoman Nkenge Harmon warning that government-authorized piracy would hurt foreign investment in Antigua.
This document is a scientific figure (Fig. S12) from a larger report, bearing a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp. It displays six graphs analyzing 'fame trajectories' and 'average fame at birth' for various historical figures (e.g., Lincoln, Darwin, Robert Kennedy) to illustrate a methodology for filtering query names based on 'premature fame signals.' The document appears to be technical or academic in nature, likely included as an attachment or reference in a larger file collection.
This document appears to be a page from a book manuscript (Chapter 15) written by a high-profile lawyer (likely Alan Dershowitz, given the context of the document dump). The text discusses the intersection of media and law, referencing the O.J. Simpson and Mike Tyson cases as examples of high-publicity trials. The author reflects on the concept of 'celebrity justice,' the impact of televised trials (mentioning Court TV), and defends their record of representing both famous and indigent clients.
A document dated April 2, 2012, appearing to be a draft page (page 227) from a book or legal manuscript. The text contrasts the progress of science (specifically DNA evidence) in exonerating the innocent with the 'regression' of the law, specifically criticizing the Supreme Court and Congress for making it difficult to reopen closed cases. The author heavily criticizes Justice Scalia's view that 'actual innocence' is not a constitutional claim if the original trial was procedurally fair.
This page appears to be an excerpt from a manuscript or legal brief (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the context of the House Oversight production) discussing First Amendment rights regarding parody and caricature. It details the case of *Bowman v. Heller*, where David Heller was sued by coworker Sylvia Smith Bowman for distributing lewd, photoshopped images of her during a union election. The text describes the graphic nature of the images and notes the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts' ruling that Bowman was not a public figure.
This document is a log of text messages exchanged on February 2, 2019, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the email jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual. The conversation centers on the movie 'Lincoln,' with Epstein emphasizing the concept of the President having 'unlimited power to fight the enemy.' The document originates from a House Oversight Committee investigation.
This document appears to be page 57 of a larger manuscript or book included in the House Oversight release. It features a quote by Brett Piersen regarding complexity theory and human cognition, followed by a reproduction of Peter Norvig's famous satirical 'Gettysburg Address' PowerPoint presentation, which mocks corporate presentation styles by reducing Lincoln's speech to bullet points.
This document appears to be page 178 of a House Oversight Committee report focused on the Edward Snowden leaks. It details operational security failures by Snowden and his journalist contacts (Poitras, Greenwald) in 2013, noting that Poitras shared information with multiple people and Greenwald shared details with his partner, David Miranda. The text also analyzes Russian cyber espionage capabilities, noting their focus on breaking TOR networks and their advanced tools capable of bypassing US government security.
This document appears to be page 152 of a historical book or manuscript discussing the history of colonialism, the opium wars in China, and the rise of industrial warfare (specifically the Maxim and Gatling guns). It references historical figures like Lin Zexu, Queen Victoria, Lincoln, and Bismarck. While the text itself is historical non-fiction, the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018384' indicates it was included in a document production for the House Oversight Committee, likely as part of a larger investigation file (possibly related to Jeffrey Epstein's financial records or associates, where such a book or manuscript might have been found in evidence).
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity