law enforcement
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
US Attorney's Office (SDNY)
|
Collaboration |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-01-01 | Arrest | Schulte was arrested on suspicion of leaking national defense information. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00009771.jpg
This document is page 14 of a juror questionnaire for Juror ID 50, filed as part of a court case on March 24, 2022. The juror denies having any financial disputes with the government and also denies that they, any family members, or close friends work in law, law enforcement, the justice system, or the courts. The responses on this page indicate no declared conflicts of interest related to these specific topics.
DOJ-OGR-00009673.jpg
This document is a portion of a juror questionnaire for Juror ID 50, filed on March 9, 2022, as part of case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The juror denies ever having a financial dispute with the government and also denies that they, their family, or close friends work in law, law enforcement, the justice system, or the courts. The responses suggest no conflicts of interest based on the questions asked on this page.
DOJ-OGR-00009669.jpg
This document is page 8 of a jury questionnaire (Juror ID 50) filed on March 9, 2022, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The juror answers 'No' to questions regarding bias against law enforcement searches (Q15), bias regarding expert witnesses (Q16), and concerns about following instructions to avoid media coverage (Q17). The document bears a DOJ Bates stamp.
DOJ-OGR-00004833.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a court filing in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), but the text specifically details the 2005 investigation into Bill Cosby regarding Ms. Constand. It summarizes Prosecutor Bruce Castor's rationale for declining to prosecute Cosby at that time, citing insufficient evidence, credibility issues with the accuser, and the existence of phone records and wire interceptions. The document is likely included in the Maxwell docket as a legal exhibit or precedent regarding non-prosecution agreements.
DOJ-OGR-00002712.jpg
This document is page 19 of a legal filing (Document 148) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on February 4, 2021. It details the defense's motion requesting the Court to order the government to disclose Jencks Act material (witness statements, notes, emails, texts) by March 12, 2021, citing the complexity of the case and the global pandemic. The page also begins a section (VI) requesting a list of government witnesses intended for trial.
DOJ-OGR-00014492.jpg
This document is a partial legal summation from August 10, 2022, discussing evidence presented or promised in a case, likely related to Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. It highlights discrepancies between promised evidence (like nude photographs and schoolgirl outfits) and what was actually seen, and notes that law enforcement witnesses failed to deliver on promises and case agents were not called to testify. The document also references FedEx records indicating Ghislaine Maxwell did not send anything to an underage girl.
DOJ-OGR-00005261.jpg
This document is a legal filing detailing a defense team's motions in limine to exclude specific evidence, testimony, and terminology (including references to Jeffrey Epstein and characterizing accusers as "victims") in a criminal case. It also outlines procedures for temporary sealing of confidential discovery materials and reserves the right to file additional motions.
DOJ-OGR-00005173.jpg
This legal document, filed on September 7, 2021, outlines the procedures for the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. It details how claimants can submit forms and supporting documentation to the program's Administrator, Jordana H. Feldman, in Washington, D.C. The document also describes the factors the Administrator will consider when evaluating claims, such as medical records and contemporaneous correspondence, to determine the credibility of sexual abuse allegations.
DOJ-OGR-00011704.jpg
This document is a transcript of an opening statement by Ms. Pomerantz in a criminal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The prosecution outlines its case against an unnamed defendant, alleging their involvement with Jeffrey Epstein in the abuse of underage victims. The statement details the evidence to be presented, including testimony from victims' relatives, Epstein's pilots and staff, and law enforcement who searched Epstein's Palm Beach and New York residences, to establish the defendant's role and efforts to create a 'culture of silence'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027120.jpg
This document appears to be a page from an interview with Daniel Pipes (referred to as DP) conducted by 'TB' (likely Tom Bethell given the context of 'The American Spectator'). The text discusses Pipes' academic career, the distinction between traditional Islam and political Islamism, and the geopolitical landscape post-9/11. While the document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, there is no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, or their immediate network on this specific page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015654.jpg
This document is the conclusion page (page 5) of a legal filing dated February 8, 2016. Attorney Sigrid S. McCawley, representing non-party Virginia Giuffre, requests the court to allow a limited release of Giuffre's confidential deposition transcript to law enforcement. The document bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015654.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015018.jpg
This document appears to be a statement or correspondence submitted to the House Oversight Committee (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015018). The unnamed author alleges a complex conspiracy involving government surveillance, the 'sabotage' of their pregnancy, and the use of children for sexual blackmail to control politicians, referencing the 'Franklin Scandal.' The text connects these allegations to corporate contracts involving SAIC, Tetra Tech, and Accenture, specifically accusing Sue Horton of facilitating the Afghan heroin trade through State Department contracts, and also questions the suspicious nature of Justice Scalia's death.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015005.jpg
The document is a conspiratorial narrative linking the suspicious death of Justice Scalia to broader 'murder ops' and corporate corruption involving SAIC, Tetra Tech, and government contracts. It details the career movements of Bud and Sue Horton between IBM, Accenture, and Tetra Tech, alleging their involvement in securing billion-dollar contracts with the State Department and DoD that purportedly facilitated the Afghan heroin trade. The text also references the 'Franklin Scandal' and criticizes the lack of autopsy for Justice Scalia.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024121.jpg
This document is page 15 of a report produced by the consulting firm Protiviti, bearing a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp. It outlines the U.S. federal agencies responsible for combating money laundering and terrorist financing (including specific offices within Treasury, DOJ, and the State Department) and details key regulatory publications such as the FFIEC Bank Secrecy Act/AML Examination Handbook.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029967.jpg
This document appears to be a single page excerpt from a House Oversight investigation file (indicated by the Bates stamp). It contains a brief narrative or quote regarding an individual named 'Allen' who discusses shifting from a purely law enforcement perspective to listening to leaders of the Bitcoin movement, finding their arguments persuasive.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity