| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Origin |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Maria
|
Resident |
1
|
1 |
This document appears to be a page from a memoir by Ehud Barak (indicated by the header) included in a House Oversight Committee production. It details the political dynamics of the Israeli-Palestinian peace process during the Obama administration, specifically focusing on a 10-month settlement freeze and the hesitation of both Mahmoud Abbas and Benjamin Netanyahu. The text recounts a specific meeting in New York between Barak and negotiator Yitzhak Molcho, followed by a secure phone call to Netanyahu criticizing the lack of genuine intent to reach a deal.
This document outlines the governance structure and listing process for an entity referred to as 'KUE'. It details the composition of the Board of Directors, specifically the rights of outside investors to appoint directors and the requirements for 'Independent Directors' based on NYSE rules. It also defines the 'Initial Listing' process, which requires an offering generating at least $200 million in gross proceeds.
This document excerpt describes the author's encounters with Jeffrey Epstein, including meeting him on a flight to TED and being invited to his New York home. It details Epstein's past travels with Bill Clinton, his attempts to understand and influence media coverage, and his unsuccessful bid to acquire New York Magazine in 2004. The text also mentions media profiles on Epstein by Vicki Ward and Landon Thomas, focusing on his wealth and influence despite lacking conventional credentials.
This page appears to be from a book manuscript (likely by journalist Edward Jay Epstein) included in House Oversight records. The narrator describes being in Moscow in November 2013, attempting unsuccessfully to interview Edward Snowden via his lawyer Anatoly Kucherena. Failing that, the narrator contacts Andrei Lugovoy, a suspect in the Alexander Litvinenko poisoning, and arranges a meeting at the National Hotel to discuss the case and potentially gain access to Kucherena.
This document appears to be a page from a book or investigative report (Chapter 25: Vanishing Act) included in House Oversight Committee files. It details the author's 2015 trip to Moscow to investigate Edward Snowden's 2013 arrival and subsequent stay in the airport transit zone. The text challenges Snowden's narrative, citing reports from *Izvestia* that suggest his arrival was a coordinated operation with Russian intelligence services, rather than him simply being trapped due to a revoked passport.
This document appears to be an excerpt from a narrative or report (marked with House Oversight numbering) detailing a journalist's efforts to interview Edward Snowden in Moscow. The narrator communicates with a source named Zamir, who instructs that all access must go through a lawyer named Kucherena, involving a strict vetting process. The narrator subsequently arranges a visa in New York and travel to Moscow to attempt the meeting. While part of a dataset that may include Epstein materials, this specific page deals exclusively with the Snowden interview logistics.
This document, appearing to be an excerpt from a narrative report or book within a House Oversight file, details a meeting between the author and director Oliver Stone. They discuss Stone's exclusivity deal with Snowden's lawyer, Anatoly Kucherena (an FSB board member), which blocked a competing Sony project. The author, seeking to interview Snowden, learns that Snowden is aware of their book project and subsequently hires Moscow 'fixer' Zamir Gotta to facilitate a meeting.
This document is a page from a book (Chapter 24) detailing a dinner between the narrator and director Oliver Stone in New York. The conversation focuses on Stone's film about Edward Snowden, specifically probing the financial arrangements Stone made to gain access to Snowden in Moscow, including a $1 million payment to Snowden's lawyer, Anatoly Kucherena, for 'total access' disguised as book rights. The text also mentions the Sony Pictures hack and payments made to The Guardian.
This document appears to be page 186 of a House Oversight report detailing the timeline of Edward Snowden's NSA leaks in June 2013. It describes his coordination with journalists Glenn Greenwald and Laura Poitras in Hong Kong, the release of the leaks by The Guardian and Washington Post, and the immediate geopolitical fallout involving US-China relations during a summit between Obama and Xi Jinping. Despite the prompt's context, there is no mention of Jeffrey Epstein or his associates in this specific document.
This document appears to be a page from a narrative report or book regarding Russian intelligence operations, specifically the SVR's 'Illegals Program.' It details how a source named Poteyev informed the CIA about sleeper agents, including Anna Chapman, and discusses the high costs of FBI surveillance required to monitor these individuals ($10,000/day). The text concludes with a 2010 warning from Poteyev that Russian military intelligence was seeking to activate these agents for a sensitive assignment.
This document details the events surrounding the publication of Edward Snowden's NSA leaks in June 2013, describing how journalists verified his credibility using code phrases and the subsequent interactions with government officials before publication. It recounts the release of the Verizon and PRISM stories by the Guardian and Washington Post, followed by Snowden's decision to reveal his identity through a video interview to define his own narrative before the government could demonize him.
This document, page 95 of a House Oversight file, details the interactions between journalists Laura Poitras, Glenn Greenwald, and hacktivist Jacob Appelbaum with Edward Snowden (referred to as Citizen 4) leading up to the 2013 NSA leaks. It describes the vetting process of Snowden's technical claims, Greenwald's travel logistics from Rio to New York to seek approval from Guardian editor Janine Gibson, and Gibson's hesitation regarding Snowden's 'manifesto.' The text outlines the specific legal risks and editorial decisions faced by The Guardian regarding the publication of SCI top-secret documents.
This document, marked as a House Oversight exhibit, details the logistical coordination behind the 2013 NSA leaks involving Edward Snowden, Laura Poitras, and Glenn Greenwald. It describes a clandestine meeting on April 19, 2013, in a New York Marriott where Poitras introduced Greenwald to communications from Snowden (alias 'Citizen 4') while employing strict operational security measures to avoid surveillance. The text also notes the alignment between Snowden's mission statement and Greenwald's public criticism of the 'Surveillance State.'
This document page, stamped 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT', narrates the coordination between Edward Snowden and Laura Poitras during the early stages of the NSA leaks (circa 2013). It details Snowden's instructions for Poitras to recruit journalist Glenn Greenwald (for access to The Guardian) and Barton Gellman (for access to The Washington Post). The text describes the tradecraft and precautions Poitras utilized during a clandestine meeting with Gellman in Lower Manhattan to discuss the classified documents.
This page of a House Oversight report details the timeline of Edward Snowden's attempts to contact journalists Glenn Greenwald and Laura Poitras in late 2012 and early 2013 regarding NSA domestic surveillance. It describes Poitras' background, her anti-surveillance activism, and her connections to other figures like William Binney and Jacob Appelbaum. The text concludes with Snowden contacting Micah Lee in January 2013 as a secure route to reach Poitras in Berlin.
This document appears to be a page (labeled Chapter Nine) from a narrative report or book included in House Oversight files, detailing the background of journalist Glenn Greenwald and his initial contact with Edward Snowden in late 2012. It outlines Greenwald's previous career as a litigator and entrepreneur involved in adult entertainment, his financial troubles (IRS lien), and his pivot to anti-surveillance blogging for Salon and the Guardian. The text notes a political alignment between Snowden and Greenwald, as both donated to Ron Paul's campaign.
This document appears to be page 201 of a manuscript or book submitted to the House Oversight Committee (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018433). The text is a philosophical essay discussing the dangers of a technocratic elite ('New Caste') taking over governance without humanistic understanding, comparing them to the 'dictatorship of the Thirty' in Plato's time. It critiques both current political leaders for their ignorance of technology and technologists for their ignorance of humanity, citing computer scientist Terry Winograd and philosophers Plato and Socrates.
This document appears to be a page (p. 172) from a manuscript or book draft discussing geopolitical theory, specifically the concept of 'Gatekeeping' in the age of networks. It contrasts physical borders with topological controls over data and population flows, referencing historical figures like Lloyd George and Arnold Toynbee to draw parallels between colonial land acquisition and modern network power. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018404' stamp, indicating it was produced as evidence in a US House Oversight investigation.
This document is page 154 of a manuscript or book, bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. It discusses the historical impact of military technology on warfare, drawing parallels between the 'guns x machines' era of WWI and modern 'networks x weapons.' It cites historical examples including the Peloponnesian War and quotes from Siegfried Sassoon and an anecdote about Hiram Maxim.
This document is page 143 of a manuscript or book draft included in House Oversight evidence files (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018375). The text discusses technological networks, time perception, and latency, referencing Snapchat, Tinder, and high-frequency trading. It explicitly quotes Marvin Minsky (a known Epstein associate) regarding 'The Society of Mind' and links him to 'Hillis' (likely Danny Hillis), while also citing computer engineer Leslie Lamport's work on distributed systems.
This document appears to be page 142 of a manuscript, book draft, or essay discussing the sociology and economics of speed, technology, and connectivity ('statefulness'). It references historical examples of transportation and computing growth to illustrate 'induced demand.' While stamped as House Oversight evidence, the text itself is philosophical in nature and quotes figures like Marx, Gordon Moore, and Marina Keegan.
This document is page 140 of a manuscript or book draft (evidenced by the 'TK' placeholder in footnote 205). The text discusses sociological and economic theories regarding connectivity, 'Locational Utility,' and the 'kinetic elite'—those who can move effortlessly through the world versus those who cannot. It references tech companies like Airbnb and Uber and cites thinkers like Adam Smith, Danny Hillis, and Peter Sloterdjik. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was collected as part of a congressional investigation.
This document is the final signature page of a legal brief or correspondence dated December 28, 2018, signed by Assistant District Attorney Karen Friedman Agnifilo. It references the procedural history of a SORA hearing and copies the law firm Davis Wright Tremaine LLP.
This is a legal affirmation filed on December 31, 2018, by Assistant District Attorney Karen Friedman Agnifilo in the New York Supreme Court. It is a response to a motion by NYP Holdings, Inc. (The Post) seeking to unseal 2011 appellate briefs related to Jeffrey Epstein's adjudication as a Level III sex offender. The document highlights privacy protections for sex crime victims under Civil Rights Law § 50-b while acknowledging the media's request for redacted copies.
This document is an email chain from December 6, 2018, between NY Post reporter Susan Edelman and Danny Frost, Director of Communications for the Manhattan District Attorney. Edelman questions why the DA's office sealed documents in the Epstein case rather than filing a redacted brief, accusing them of covering up facts. Frost responds that sealing is routine practice under Civil Rights Law § 50-b for sex crimes but confirms the DA's office will not oppose a petition by the Post to unseal a redacted brief.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity