| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-01-18 | N/A | Court hearing where prosecutor Gaffney argued evidence didn't justify harshest status for Epstein. | New York | View |
| 2011-01-18 | N/A | Hearing regarding Epstein's sex offender status. | New York | View |
This document, likely a legal memorandum submitted to the House Oversight Committee, details 'The Post's' investigation into the Manhattan District Attorney's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. It discusses allegations that ADA Gaffney and DA Cyrus Vance were unduly lenient or negligent regarding Epstein's sex offender registration and describes reporter Sue Edelman's failed December 2018 attempt to obtain sealed appellate briefs regarding the matter.
This document, likely a page from a House Oversight Committee report or legal brief, details the lenient legal treatment Jeffrey Epstein received in both Florida (2008) and New York (2011). It cites N.Y. Post reporting that suggests Epstein's powerful connections to Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, and Prince Andrew may have influenced prosecutors to grant him favorable conditions, such as serving time in county jail rather than state prison and receiving a lower sex-offender status classification. The text specifically criticizes the Manhattan District Attorney's Office for 'going to bat' for Epstein during a 2011 hearing.
The document is a news article detailing the scrutiny faced by Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance's office over its handling of Jeffrey Epstein's sex offender hearing, following revelations of a secret non-prosecution agreement in Florida. It highlights critical remarks from Judge Pickholz, the involvement of prosecutor Gaffney, and the role of then-U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta in sealing a federal indictment, ultimately questioning how Vance could have been unaware of the high-profile case.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity