ENGLAND AND WALES
LocationRelationship Network
EFTA00013181.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 11, 2019, involving the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). A journalist, Nick Allen from The Daily Telegraph, emailed a government official asking 'on background' if they intended to question Prince Andrew or Ghislaine Maxwell, and seeking confirmation on a New York Post report that Maxwell was cooperating with authorities. A USANYS official responded internally, stating 'I'll handle.'
DOJ-OGR-00001206.jpg
This document is an addendum to a legal opinion concerning the potential extradition of Ghislaine Maxwell from England and Wales to the United States. It reaffirms the original opinion's conclusions that her extradition is highly likely, bail would almost certainly be denied, and she would be unable to successfully resist extradition based on the charges in a July 2020 indictment. The addendum also clarifies the relevance of a potential waiver of extradition in UK legal proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00002227.jpg
This document is an Addendum Opinion filed on December 23, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It analyzes English extradition law to support the argument that if Maxwell were to flee to the UK, she would almost certainly be denied bail there and her extradition back to the US would be a 'virtual foregone conclusion.' The opinion asserts that a waiver of extradition signed by Maxwell would be highly admissible and relevant in UK courts.
DOJ-OGR-00002099.jpg
This legal document, filed on December 14, 2020, outlines the extradition arrangements between the United Kingdom and the United States. It specifies that the process is governed by the UK's Extradition Act 2003 and a bilateral treaty signed in 2003, which designates the U.S. as a 'Part 2 territory'. This designation exempts the U.S. from the standard requirement to provide prima facie evidence when requesting an extradition from the UK.
DOJ-OGR-00005908.jpg
This document, an excerpt from an academic review filed in a legal case, discusses the need for a clearer definition of sexual grooming of children. It proposes a new definition that encompasses preparing the child, adults, and environment for abuse, and critiques existing theories of child sexual abuse for largely ignoring the grooming phenomenon. The text emphasizes that a better understanding is crucial for effective legislation, prevention, and treatment, referencing the UK's Sexual Offences Act 2003 as an example of legislative action.
DOJ-OGR-00017410.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) involving the direct examination of a witness named Visoski. The proceedings cover the stipulation and admission of Government Exhibits 11 through 16 and 1004, which includes a birth certificate from England and Wales. Ms. Comey notes that these exhibits are sealed to protect witnesses testifying under pseudonyms, and the Court grants permission for jurors to view these sealed binders.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016520.jpg
This page is an extract from a legal brief or filing submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee (likely related to the Epstein investigation). It cites a Minnesota Law Review article discussing the limitations of victims' rights in the U.S. compared to other jurisdictions, specifically noting that U.S. victims generally lack the power to challenge prosecutorial discretion (decisions not to prosecute). The document includes extensive footnotes citing various examples of enforcement discretion and budget limitations in contexts like tax law and marijuana enforcement.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity