This document is a 'Summons in a Civil Action' filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on September 17, 2010. The case (No. 9:10-cv-81111-WPD) involves plaintiff 'M.J.' suing defendants Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. The summons is addressed to Sarah Kellen at an apartment in Palm Beach, FL, instructing her to respond to the complaint within 21 days via plaintiff's attorney Bradley J. Edwards.
This document is a Summons in a Civil Action filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida on September 17, 2010. The plaintiff, identified as M.J., is suing Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. The document commands Epstein to respond within 21 days and lists Bradley J. Edwards as the plaintiff's attorney. The second page is an unfilled Proof of Service form.
This document is a chain of emails between an FBI Special Agent from the Child Exploitation/Human Trafficking unit and a Trial Attorney from Edwards Pottinger LLC, dating from June 23 to July 13, 2020. They are coordinating telephone interviews for two victims/clients regarding the Epstein case. The attorney also specifically requests '302's' (FBI interview reports) or verification that victims have been interviewed.
An email dated January 3, 2019, from Stan Pottinger of Edwards Pottinger LLC regarding a confidentiality order in a legal case against Maxwell presided over by Judge Sweet. The email forwards three PDF attachments identified as a Sealed Opinion, a Protective Order, and a notice of Case Manager Assignment, with the body text noting that 'These documents are public.'
This document contains an email chain between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and attorneys Brad Edwards and Brittany Henderson of Edwards Pottinger LLC. The correspondence, dating between September 2019 and January 2020, concerns the transfer of evidence—specifically emails and 'photo booth' style photographs—related to a witness who had encounters with Jeffrey Epstein. The prosecutor mentions needing the photos to attach to an FBI '302' interview report.
This legal document, a letter dated December 15, 2020, from Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, contains a statement from Annie Farmer opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for bail. Farmer, a victim of Maxwell, details Maxwell's history of abuse, manipulative behavior, and flight risk, arguing that Maxwell is a psychopath who lacks remorse and would flee to avoid justice. The statement emphasizes the need for Maxwell to stand trial to ensure justice for her victims.
This is a legal letter dated March 26, 2021, from attorney Sigrid S. McCawley of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell*. The letter informs the court that BSF, representing victims, has conferred with the defendant's counsel and agreed to redact a small piece of information from a recent filing out of caution. BSF states it will remove these redactions if the court orders it to do so.
This document is a legal declaration filed by Sigrid S. McCawley on March 26, 2021, in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. McCawley, an attorney for an intervenor, declares under penalty of perjury that she meets the requirements for admission pro hac vice, including having no felony convictions or disciplinary actions. She is associated with Boies Schiller Flexner LLP and is a member of the bars of Florida and Washington, D.C.
This legal document is a Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed on March 26, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Attorney Sigrid S. McCawley, from the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, is requesting permission to appear as counsel for her firm and the victims they represent in the criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The motion affirms McCawley's good standing in the bars of Florida and Washington, D.C., and attests that she has no history of felonies or disciplinary actions.
This document is a 'Counsel List' page from a legal filing in the case 'Edwards adv. Epstein' (Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG). It details the contact information (addresses, phone numbers, emails) for attorneys representing Jeffrey Epstein, including Jack Goldberger, Martin Weinberg, and Joseph Ackerman, as well as Marc Nurik representing Scott Rothstein. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
This document is Page 2 of a legal filing titled 'Notice of Filing Transcript In Supplemental Support of Bradley Edwards' Motion for Summary Judgment' in the case of Edwards adv. Epstein (Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG). It contains a 'Counsel List' providing the contact information (firm name, address, phone, and fax) for five attorneys: Bradley J. Edwards, Jack A. Goldberger, Marc S. Nurik, Tonja Haddad Coleman, and Lilly Ann Sanchez. The document is Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017489.
This document is a 'Counsel List' (Page 20 of 20) from a court filing in the case of 'Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz' (Case No. CACE 15-000072). It provides contact information for attorneys representing the parties involved, including addresses, emails, and phone numbers for law firms such as Boies Schiller & Flexner, Cole Scott & Kissane, and Wiley Rein. The document contains apparent clerical errors, as it lists nearly all attorneys—including the plaintiff Bradley Edwards and his counsel—under the label 'Attorneys for Alan M.Dershowitz, Esquire'.
This document is a 'Counsel List' page from a legal filing in the case of Edwards adv. Epstein (Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG), likely from 2009 based on the case number. It lists contact information for attorneys representing Jeffrey Epstein (Jack Goldberger, Martin Weinberg, Joseph Ackerman, and the firm Farmer, Jaffe, et al.) and an attorney representing Scott Rothstein (Marc S. Nurik). The document includes email addresses, physical addresses in Florida and Massachusetts, and phone/fax numbers.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity