| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-11-01 | Legal case | The case of United States v. Borrero, No. 13 Cr. 58 (KBF), 2013 WL 6020773, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. ... | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2013-01-01 | Legal case | The legal case of United States v. Borrero, 2013 WL 6020773 (S.D.N.Y. 2013), was decided. It is c... | S.D.N.Y. | View |
This legal document, filed on December 17, 2021, is a page from a court proceeding in the case against Ms. Maxwell. The judge is providing guidance on the admissibility of evidence, citing the 2013 case 'United States v. Borrero' as precedent. The court will permit the defense to cross-examine government witnesses about their prior statements that did not implicate Ms. Maxwell in order to impeach their credibility.
This legal document is a portion of a motion filed by the prosecution ('Government') arguing against the defense's desire to introduce evidence related to a past charging decision from a Florida investigation. The prosecution contends this evidence is irrelevant, cumulative, and would invite the jury to speculate, creating a 'bizarre spectacle' that distracts from the actual evidence of the current trial. The document cites case law to support its position that the jury should only consider the evidence presented in this specific case, not the prosecutorial decisions made in other jurisdictions.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity